A Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Women With HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00333775

Last Updated: 2016-01-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

736 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of Avastin in combination with docetaxel, versus docetaxel plus placebo, in patients with metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer who are candidates for taxane-based chemotherapy but who have not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The anticipated time on treatment is 1-2 years and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Five participants randomized to the docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus placebo group actually received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg and are included in the docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg group for the adverse event results. Sixteen participants randomized to the docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus placebo group actually received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kg and are included in the docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 plus bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kg group for the adverse event results.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 plus placebo

Participants received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle for a maximum of 27 weeks (9 cycles). In addition, participants received placebo to bevacizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant withdrawal.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel was supplied in 2 vials, 1 containing docetaxel and 1 containing a solvent, for intravenous infusion.

Placebo to bevacizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to bevacizumab was supplied as a sterile liquid for intravenous infusion in single-use vials.

Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg

Participants received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle for a maximum of 27 weeks (9 cycles). In addition, participants received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant withdrawal.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel was supplied in 2 vials, 1 containing docetaxel and 1 containing a solvent, for intravenous infusion.

Bevacizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Bevacizumab was supplied as a sterile liquid for intravenous infusion in single-use vials.

Docetaxel 100 mg/m^2 plus bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kg

Participants received docetaxel 100 mg/m\^2 intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle for a maximum of 27 weeks (9 cycles). In addition, participants received bevacizumab 15.0 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant withdrawal.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel was supplied in 2 vials, 1 containing docetaxel and 1 containing a solvent, for intravenous infusion.

Bevacizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Bevacizumab was supplied as a sterile liquid for intravenous infusion in single-use vials.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Docetaxel

Docetaxel was supplied in 2 vials, 1 containing docetaxel and 1 containing a solvent, for intravenous infusion.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to bevacizumab

Placebo to bevacizumab was supplied as a sterile liquid for intravenous infusion in single-use vials.

Intervention Type DRUG

Bevacizumab

Bevacizumab was supplied as a sterile liquid for intravenous infusion in single-use vials.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Avastin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female patients ≥ 18 years of age.
* Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative cancer of the breast with locally recurrent or metastatic disease, suitable for chemotherapy.
* No adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 months before randomization, and no taxane-based chemotherapy within 12 months before randomization.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous chemotherapy for metastatic or locally recurrent breast cancer.
* Radiotherapy for treatment of metastatic disease.
* Other primary tumors within last 5 years, except for controlled limited basal cell or squamous cancer of the skin, or cancer in situ of the cervix.
* Spinal cord compression or brain metastases.
* Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to randomization.
* Inadequate bone marrow, liver, or renal function.
* Uncontrolled hypertension.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Adelaide, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Ringwood East, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Vöcklabruck, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Ansbach, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Lemgo, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Trieste, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy

Site Status

Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy

Site Status

Treviglio, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Biella, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Taormina, Sicily, Italy

Site Status

Macerata, The Marches, Italy

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Mexicali, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Mérida, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Obregón, , Mexico

Site Status

Puebla City, , Mexico

Site Status

Sittard, , Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Panama City, , Panama

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Sandton, , South Africa

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Jaén, Jaen, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Málaga, Malaga, Spain

Site Status

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Chur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Bournemouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Middlesex, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Truro, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada China France Germany Italy Lithuania Mexico Netherlands Panama Poland Portugal Romania South Africa South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Thailand United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wedam SB, Beaver JA, Amiri-Kordestani L, Bloomquist E, Tang S, Goldberg KB, Sridhara R, Ibrahim A, Kim G, Kluetz P, McKee A, Pazdur R. US Food and Drug Administration Pooled Analysis to Assess the Impact of Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer on Clinical Trial Outcomes and Radiographic Assessments. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1225-1231. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.6917. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29522361 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2005-003862-40

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BO17708

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.