Comparison of an Easy to Read Advance Directive Versus a Standard Advance Directive
NCT ID: NCT00328055
Last Updated: 2011-04-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-08-31
2005-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Active Choice on Advance Directive Completion Rates
NCT02289105
Comparing the Stanford Letter Project Form to Traditional Advance Directives
NCT02799537
Choice Sets for Advance Directives
NCT02209038
Patient Perception of Video Advance Care Planning
NCT02692950
Advance Directives Completion Rates and an Intervention to Address Health Literacy in a Clinic Population
NCT02702284
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study hypothesized that an advance directive form written at a 5th grade reading level (AD-Easy) that included culturally appropriate graphics explaining the text, and also included questions concerning patients' values, would be preferred over the standard advance directive form being used in California (AD-Standard).
The participant's literacy level and baseline knowledge of advance directive topics were assessed. Participants were then stratified by literacy level to be randomized to first attempt to read and complete either the AD-Easy or the AD-Standard. Then the participant's acceptance of the forms, self-efficacy or confidence with treatment decisions, attitudes about the form's utility, and post form review comprehension were assessed. Participants then crossed over to review the alternate form and were asked to state which form they preferred to take home. Six months later participants were called and asked if they had thought about their medical treatment preferences, spoken to their family, friends, or doctor about their treatment preferences, or if they filled out the advance directive form.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AD-Easy (Advance Directive-Easy)
AD-Standard (Advance Directive-Standard)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary physician in the General Medicine Clinic at San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
* English- or Spanish-speaking
Exclusion Criteria
* Deaf
* Delirious
* Demented
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pfizer
INDUSTRY
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rebecca Sudore, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
San Francisco General Hospital
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):889-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241305.
Ott BB, Hardie TL. Readability of advance directive documents. Image J Nurs Sch. 1997 Spring;29(1):53-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1997.tb01140.x.
Nolan MT. Could lack of clarity in written advance directives contribute to their ineffectiveness? A study of the content of written advance directives. Appl Nurs Res. 2003 Feb;16(1):65-9. doi: 10.1053/apnr.2003.50007.
Jacobson TA, Thomas DM, Morton FJ, Offutt G, Shevlin J, Ray S. Use of a low-literacy patient education tool to enhance pneumococcal vaccination rates. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999 Aug 18;282(7):646-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.7.646.
Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement U.S. Department of Education; 1993 http://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AG0066
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.