Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Open Label Trial to Investigate Macugen for the Preservation of Visual Function in Subjects With Neovascular AMD (NCT NCT00327470)

Last Updated: 2012-04-04

Results Overview

The investigator assessed the best-corrected VA obtained by a protocol refraction using the retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts recorded at a 2-meter distance from the chart. Distance VA was expressed as an ETDRS score (number of letters correctly read): the proportion of subjects losing \>=30 letters or \<15 letters from Baseline, gaining \>=0 or \>=15 letters from Baseline. The mean change in VA from Baseline at Week 54 was assessed.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

288 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline through Week 54

Results posted on

2012-04-04

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure	Early Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Subjects with early choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions were distinguished from subjects with established CNV lesions based on the stage of evolution of their CNV as determined by fluorescein angiography and, where available, indocyanine green angiography as assessed by the investigator at Baseline. Subjects with early CNV lesions were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 milligram \[mg\]) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Overall Study STARTED	107	181
Overall Study Treated	107	179
Overall Study COMPLETED	78	118
Overall Study NOT COMPLETED	29	63

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure	Early Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Subjects with early choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions were distinguished from subjects with established CNV lesions based on the stage of evolution of their CNV as determined by fluorescein angiography and, where available, indocyanine green angiography as assessed by the investigator at Baseline. Subjects with early CNV lesions were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 milligram \[mg\]) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Overall Study Randomized, but not treated	0	2
Overall Study Adverse Event	9	14
Overall Study Lack of Efficacy	7	19
Overall Study Other	5	9
Overall Study Lost to Follow-up	1	3
Overall Study Withdrawal by Subject	6	12
Overall Study Death	1	4

Baseline Characteristics

An Open Label Trial to Investigate Macugen for the Preservation of Visual Function in Subjects With Neovascular AMD

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure	Early AMD n=107 Participants Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=179 Participants Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Total n=286 Participants Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized 45 through 64 years	12 Participants n=5 Participants	24 Participants n=7 Participants	36 Participants n=5 Participants
Age, Customized >= 65 years	95 Participants n=5 Participants	155 Participants n=7 Participants	250 Participants n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Female	59 Participants n=5 Participants	108 Participants n=7 Participants	167 Participants n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Male	48 Participants n=5 Participants	71 Participants n=7 Participants	119 Participants n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 54

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all subjects in the safety population who had a Baseline distance VA measurement and at least 1 post-Baseline VA measurement. Last observation carried forward (LOCF). Note: the number of participants analyzed refers to the number of subjects who had data that could be analyzed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Early AMD n=107 Participants Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=178 Participants Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Mean Change From Baseline Through Week 54 in Distance Visual Acuity (VA) in Subjects With Early and Established CNV Lesions	-4.30 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 14.57	-5.51 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 15.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 102, Week 54 through Week 102

Population: MITT LOCF; Note: the number of participants analyzed refers to the number of subjects who had data that could be analyzed.

The investigator assessed the best-corrected VA obtained by a protocol refraction using the retroilluminated modified Ferris-Bailey ETDRS charts recorded at a 2-meter distance from the chart. Distance VA was expressed as an ETDRS score (number of letters correctly read): the proportion of subjects losing \>=30 letters or \<15 letters, gaining \>=0 or \>=15 letters. The mean changes in VA from Baseline/Week 102 and Week 52/102 were assessed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Early AMD n=107 Participants Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=178 Participants Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Mean Change From Baseline in Distance VA in Subjects With Early and Established CNV Lesions Baseline through Week 102	-7.91 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 16.14	-8.95 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 17.34
Mean Change From Baseline in Distance VA in Subjects With Early and Established CNV Lesions Week 54 through Week 102	-3.61 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 9.83	-3.44 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 9.81

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 54, Baseline through Week 102

Population: MITT LOCF. Note: the number of participants analyzed refers to the number of subjects who had data that could be analyzed. n=number of subjects with evaluable data.

Near VA was measured with the modified Bailey-Lovie near-word reading charts at a distance of 25 centimeters using a +3.50 reading addition worn over the protocol refraction providing the best-corrected distance VA. The reading charts test the smallest word size identifiable from 0.0 logarithmic of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 1.6 logMAR. logMAR is the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. The ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMAR values \>0.00 indicate vision poorer than ideal and values \<0.0 indicate vision greater than ideal.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Early AMD n=107 Participants Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=178 Participants Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Mean Change From Baseline in Near VA in Subjects With Early and Established CNV Lesions Baseline through Week 54 (n=104, n=172)	0.10 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.27	0.15 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.32
Mean Change From Baseline in Near VA in Subjects With Early and Established CNV Lesions Baseline through Week 102 (n=105, n=172)	0.19 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.34	0.22 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.36

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 54, Baseline through Week 102, and Week 54 through Week 102

Population: MITT LOCF; Note: the number of participants analyzed refers to the number of subjects who had data that could be analyzed. n=number of subjects with evaluable data.

For assessment of reading speed, subjects were asked to read a print steadily, without stopping or interruption, at a comfortable pace. On commencing reading, a timer was activated. The timer was stopped when the subject had finished reading all of the words on the chart or at 2 minutes, whichever was sooner. Only the total number of words read correctly was recorded. The time recorded for the reading speed test was the time required for the subject to finish reading all of the words on the chart in minutes and seconds (maximum 2 minutes).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Early AMD n=107 Participants Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=178 Participants Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Mean Change in Reading Speed Baseline through Week 54 (n=92, n=151)	-9.15 Correctly read words per minute Standard Deviation 28.78	-10.98 Correctly read words per minute Standard Deviation 22.31
Mean Change in Reading Speed Baseline through Week 102 (n=94, n=152)	-17.81 Correctly read words per minute Standard Deviation 28.48	-12.23 Correctly read words per minute Standard Deviation 32.08
Mean Change in Reading Speed Week 54 through Week 102 (n=93, n=152)	-8.43 Correctly read words per minute Standard Deviation 18.06	-1.15 Correctly read words per minute Standard Deviation 23.77

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 54, Baseline through Week 102

Population: MITT LOCF; Note: the number of participants analyzed refers to the number of subjects who had data that could be analyzed. n=number of subjects with evaluable data.

Contrast sensitivity was measured using the Pelli-Robson chart at 1 meter. Subjects were tested for contrast sensitivity using +0.50 addition over the protocol refraction providing the best-corrected distance VA. Contrast sensitivity was recorded as the log of the faintest triplet for which 2 of the 3 letters were read correctly.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Early AMD n=107 Participants Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=178 Participants Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Mean Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity Baseline through Week 54 (n=93, n=152)	-0.06 Correctly read letters Standard Deviation 0.26	-0.03 Correctly read letters Standard Deviation 0.33
Mean Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity Baseline through Week 102 (n=94, n=152)	-0.16 Correctly read letters Standard Deviation 0.37	-0.09 Correctly read letters Standard Deviation 0.39

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 54, Baseline through Week 102, and Week 54 through Week 102

Population: MITT. Note: the number of participants analyzed refers to the number of subjects who had data that could be analyzed. n=number of subjects with evaluable data.

Subject reported vision-related functioning and Quality of Life (QoL) as measured using the 25 item NEI-VFQ-25. Items are grouped as the following - Composite: mean score items 1-25; General Health: item 1; General Vision: item 2; Ocular Pain: 4,19; Near Vision: 5,6,7; Distance Vision: 8,9,14; Social Functioning: 11,13; Mental Health Activities: 3,21,22,25; Role Difficulties: 17,18; Dependency: 20,23,24; Driving: 15c,16, 16a; Color Vision: 12; Peripheral Vision: 10. A positive change represents an increase in function/health, a negative change represents a decrease in function/health.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Early AMD n=107 Participants Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=178 Participants Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Mean Change in National Eye Institute - Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) Composite Score Baseline through Week 54 (n=90, n=146)	-1.54 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 12.946	-1.03 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 13.264
Mean Change in National Eye Institute - Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) Composite Score Baseline through Week 102 (n=67, n=111)	-4.57 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 14.410	-1.65 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 12.569
Mean Change in National Eye Institute - Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) Composite Score Week 54 through Week 102 (n=64, n=115)	-2.74 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 9.655	-2.48 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 9.473

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 54, Baseline through Week 102, and Week 54 through Week 102

Population: MITT. Note: the number of participants analyzed refers to the number of subjects who had data that could be analyzed. n=number of subjects with evaluable data.

The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized QoL instrument assessing general health status based on the preference of a UK general population. It consists of two sections: a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS) and a descriptive system that contains five attributes (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with three levels per attribute ("no problem", "some problems" and "extreme problems"). A subject's responses to these domains were mapped to a corresponding score of the EQ-5D index.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Early AMD n=107 Participants Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=178 Participants Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Mean Change in Euro QoL Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Score Baseline through Week 54 (n=90, n=146)	-0.00 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.260	-0.01 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.227
Mean Change in Euro QoL Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Score Baseline through Week 102 (n=67, n=111)	-0.04 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.267	-0.04 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.207
Mean Change in Euro QoL Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Score Week 54 through Week 102 (n=64, n=115)	-0.01 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.271	-0.03 Scores on a scale Standard Deviation 0.213

Adverse Events

Early AMD

Serious events: 23 serious events

Other events: 68 other events

Deaths: 0 deaths

Established AMD

Serious events: 32 serious events

Other events: 120 other events

Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Other adverse events

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Email: [email protected]

Results disclosure agreements

Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER

Serious adverse events
Measure	Early AMD n=107 participants at risk Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=179 participants at risk Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Blood and lymphatic system disorders Hypochromic anaemia	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Angina pectoris	2.8% 3/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Angina unstable	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Atrial fibrillation	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Bradycardia	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Myocardial infarction	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Myocardial ischaemia	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Palpitations	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Ear and labyrinth disorders Vertigo	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Cataract	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Eye haemorrhage	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Iridocyclitis	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Open angle glaucoma	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Retinal detachment	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Uveitis	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Visual acuity reduced	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Vitritis	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders Abdominal adhesions	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders Inguinal hernia	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders Intestinal ischaemia	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders Injection site injury	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders Oedema peripheral	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders Cholecystitis	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders Cholelithiasis	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations Cellulitis	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations Endophthalmitis	1.9% 2/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations Gastroenteritis	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations Herpes zoster	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations Urinary tract infection	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Fall	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Femur fracture	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Hip fracture	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Lower limb fracture	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Road traffic accident	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Back pain	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Intervertebral disc protrusion	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Pain in extremity	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) Bladder cancer	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) Bladder neoplasm	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Other adverse events
Measure	Early AMD n=107 participants at risk Subjects with early CNV lesions (assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).	Established AMD n=179 participants at risk Subjects with established CNV lesions (as assessed by the investigator at Baseline) were treated in the study eye with Macugen (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. All subjects completing the first year of therapy (54 weeks \[ie, 6 weeks after treatment at Week 48\]) continued treatment in the second year of the study (Weeks 54 to 102), with Macugen (0.3 mg) administered every 12 weeks (ie, Weeks 60, 72, 84, and 96).
Infections and infestations Gastrointestinal fungal infection	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders Anaemia	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	2.2% 4/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders Splenic lesion	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Aortic valve incompetence	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Arrhythmia	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Atrial fibrillation	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Cardiac failure	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders Palpitations	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders Corneal dystrophy	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Ear and labyrinth disorders Deafness	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Ear and labyrinth disorders Vertigo	2.8% 3/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Anterior chamber cell	2.8% 3/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.7% 3/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Anterior chamber flare	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Anterior chamber pigmentation	1.9% 2/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Aphakia	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Blepharitis	1.9% 2/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Blepharitis allergic	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Blindness	1.9% 2/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Blindness transient	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Blindness unilateral	2.8% 3/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Cataract	1.9% 2/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	2.2% 4/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Cataract nuclear	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Cataract subcapsular	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Chalazion	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Choroidal neovascularisation	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	3.4% 6/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Ciliary body haemorrhage	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Conjunctival haemorrhage	15.9% 17/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	8.9% 16/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Conjunctival hyperaemia	6.5% 7/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	2.2% 4/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Conjunctival oedema	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Conjunctivitis	6.5% 7/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	4.5% 8/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Corneal deposits	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Corneal disorder	1.9% 2/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Corneal epithelium defect	9.3% 10/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	2.2% 4/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Corneal erosion	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.7% 3/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Corneal oedema	4.7% 5/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	3.9% 7/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Corneal opacity	0.00% 0/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.1% 2/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Detachment of retinal pigment epithelium	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.56% 1/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Dry eye	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	1.7% 3/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Episcleritis	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders Erythema of eyelid	0.93% 1/107 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.	0.00% 0/179 The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.