Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of the Effect of Intravenous AVE0005 (VEGF Trap) in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients With Recurrent Symptomatic Malignant Ascites (NCT NCT00327444)
NCT ID: NCT00327444
Last Updated: 2013-01-01
Results Overview
TRP was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the first post-randomization paracentesis. For participants who did not undergo a postrandomization paracentesis on study, TRP was calculated from randomization to the end of the double-blind treatment period.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
58 participants
From Day 1 up to 6 months from randomization
2013-01-01
Participant Flow
Fifty-eight (58) participants from a total of 23 sites in 7 countries were enrolled in the study.
55 were randomized (started population). 3 participants were not randomized but they were treated, and permanently withdrawn from the study due to disease progression (1 participant), fatal disease progression (1 participant) and a treatment emergent adverse event (1 participant).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered placebo intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the OL period.
|
Aflibercept
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and the OL period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Double Blind Treatment (DB) Period
STARTED
|
26
|
29
|
|
Double Blind Treatment (DB) Period
SAFETY
|
25
|
30
|
|
Double Blind Treatment (DB) Period
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Double Blind Treatment (DB) Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
26
|
29
|
|
Open Label Treatment (OL) Period
STARTED
|
11
|
10
|
|
Open Label Treatment (OL) Period
ONGOING TREATMENT
|
1
|
0
|
|
Open Label Treatment (OL) Period
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Treatment (OL) Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered placebo intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the OL period.
|
Aflibercept
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and the OL period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Double Blind Treatment (DB) Period
Disease progression
|
10
|
13
|
|
Double Blind Treatment (DB) Period
Adverse Event
|
5
|
5
|
|
Double Blind Treatment (DB) Period
Subject request
|
0
|
1
|
|
Double Blind Treatment (DB) Period
Withdrew DB and continued to OL
|
11
|
10
|
|
Open Label Treatment (OL) Period
Disease progression
|
8
|
7
|
|
Open Label Treatment (OL) Period
Adverse Event
|
2
|
2
|
|
Open Label Treatment (OL) Period
Worsening dyspnea
|
0
|
1
|
|
Open Label Treatment (OL) Period
Ongoing Treatment
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of the Effect of Intravenous AVE0005 (VEGF Trap) in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients With Recurrent Symptomatic Malignant Ascites
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered placebo intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the OL period.
|
Aflibercept
n=29 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and the OL period.
|
Total
n=55 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
< 35 years
|
0 participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=35 to <45 years
|
5 participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=45 to <55 years
|
10 participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 participants
n=4 Participants
|
17 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=55 to <65 years
|
4 participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 participants
n=4 Participants
|
15 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=65 to <75 years
|
6 participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=75 years
|
1 participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
19 participants
n=93 Participants
|
22 participants
n=4 Participants
|
41 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
1 participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian, Oriental
|
6 participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 up to 6 months from randomizationPopulation: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population - all participants who were randomized in the study.
TRP was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the first post-randomization paracentesis. For participants who did not undergo a postrandomization paracentesis on study, TRP was calculated from randomization to the end of the double-blind treatment period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered placebo intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the OL period.
|
Aflibercept
n=29 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and the OL period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Repeat Paracentesis (TRP)
|
23.3 days
Standard Error 7.70
|
55.1 days
Standard Error 7.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 up to 60 days from randomization to the first postrandomization paracentesisPopulation: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population - all participants who were randomized in the study, and had evaluable AIM scores.
AIM 4 symptoms (abdominal discomfort, abdominal bloating, abdominal pain, and ability to move normally) are scored from 0 to 5, where higher scores represent worst outcomes. An AIM total score ranges from 0-20. A plot for (The AIM questionnaire total score - Baseline score) versus time were generated. AIM AUC represents the overall improvement (scored positive) if the area is below the baseline value or worsening (scored negative) if the area is above the baseline. AIM AUC for a participant is the sum of individual areas representing improvement (+) or worsening (-).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered placebo intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the OL period.
|
Aflibercept
n=16 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and the OL period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Participant Assessed Ascites Impact Measure (AIM)
|
29.8 (units on a 4-symptom scale)*day
Standard Error 148.07
|
405.3 (units on a 4-symptom scale)*day
Standard Error 143.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 up to 60 days from randomizationPopulation: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population - all participants who were randomized in the study.
60-Day FOP was defined as the total number of paracenteses performed within the first 60 days after randomization during the double blind treatment period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered placebo intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the OL period.
|
Aflibercept
n=29 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and the OL period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
60-Day Frequency of Paracentesis (FOP)
|
5.1 paracentesis
Standard Error 0.69
|
2.7 paracentesis
Standard Error 0.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Following every biweekly treatment administration up to 60 days after treatment discontinuationPopulation: The analysis was performed using the safety population with evaluable blood samples. 42 participants were evaluated.
Free aflibercept and VEGF-bound aflibercept plasma concentrations were measured by separate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The limit of quantitation of free aflibercept was 15.6 ng/mL, and of VEGF-bound aflibercept was 43.9 ng/mL. Peak free aflibercept was estimated at the end of Cycle 1 (C1) administration. The median free and VEGF-bound trough concentrations were determined for each participant beyond Cycle 3 (C3), then mean values were estimated from these median values.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered placebo intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the OL period.
|
Aflibercept
n=21 Participants
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and the OL period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Levels of Free and VEGF-bound Aflibercept
Peak Free Aflibercept (C1) (N=20, N=15)
|
69.8 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 29.7
|
62.1 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 29.5
|
|
Plasma Levels of Free and VEGF-bound Aflibercept
Trough Free Aflibercept (Beyond C3) (N=15, N=19)
|
5.33 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.67
|
5.10 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.29
|
|
Plasma Levels of Free and VEGF-bound Aflibercept
Trough Bound Aflibercept (Beyond C3) (N=16, N=17)
|
3.02 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
3.49 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.48
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Aflibercept
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=25 participants at risk
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered placebo intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the OL period.
|
Aflibercept
n=30 participants at risk
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and the OL period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiopulmonary failure
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic fistula
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer haemorrhage
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal perforation
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine perforation
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Obstruction gastric
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal perforation
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
12.0%
3/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
20.0%
6/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
32.0%
8/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
33.3%
10/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct obstruction
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal skin infection
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Investigations
Blood electrolytes abnormal
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
16.0%
4/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
13.3%
4/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Failure to thrive
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
20.0%
6/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=25 participants at risk
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered placebo intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the OL period.
|
Aflibercept
n=30 participants at risk
Participants with advanced ovarian cancer administered 4.0 mg/kg aflibercept intravenously, once every two weeks in the DB period and the OL period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
16.0%
4/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
16.7%
5/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
20.0%
5/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
16.7%
5/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
20.0%
6/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
12.0%
3/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
16.7%
5/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
20.0%
5/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
40.0%
12/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
16.7%
5/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
36.0%
9/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
36.7%
11/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
52.0%
13/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
63.3%
19/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
12.0%
3/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
23.3%
7/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
56.0%
14/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
33.3%
10/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Gait disturbance
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
40.0%
10/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
36.7%
11/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
16.0%
4/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
16.7%
5/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
36.0%
9/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
26.7%
8/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
13.3%
4/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
12.0%
3/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
16.0%
4/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
23.3%
7/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
12.0%
3/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
23.3%
7/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
13.3%
4/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
12.0%
3/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
26.7%
8/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
4.0%
1/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
23.3%
7/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
36.0%
9/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
20.0%
6/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Petechiae
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
10.0%
3/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
13.3%
4/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
12.0%
3/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
13.3%
4/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
8.0%
2/25 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
6.7%
2/30 • From treatment initiation to October 30, 2009
Adverse events were collected and reported per arm only as there was no washout period between the double-blind and open label treatment periods.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The investigator shall have the right to independently publish study results from his site after a multicenter publication, or 12 months after the completion of the study by all sites. He must provide the sponsor a copy of any such publication derived from the study for review and comment at least 45 days (20 days) in advance of any submission, and delay publication till the approval of the publication is given in writing by the Sponsor (not to exceed ninety days).
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER