Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT00326196

Last Updated: 2014-04-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

198 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, multi-site, clinical trial comparing percutaneous coronary stenting (PCI) with drug eluding stents to coronary bypass for angiographically significant coronary artery disease in diabetes. The hypothesis being tested is that a strategy of surgical revascularization is superior to percutaneous intervention in preventing death or myocardial infarction in diabetics with severe ischemic heart disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetic patients (HbA1c greater than 6.0% if treated or greater than 6.9% untreated) with severe ischemic heart disease and clinical indications for coronary revascularization will be screened and, if agreeable, entered into the study. Qualified patients unwilling to participate in the randomized trial will be approached for participation in a Registry that will collect computerized health data. The study consists of a 4-year accrual period. The median follow-up will be 3.7 years with a maximum of six years and a minimum of two years. Six sites will begin recruitment in the first year followed by nine additional sites for the remaining three years. The study is powered to detect a 40% relative difference between the groups in time to death or MI with a two-sided, type I error of 5% and a power of 90%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PCI

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Intervention Type DEVICE

percutaneous coronary stenting with drug eluding stents

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

coronary bypass

CABG

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

coronary bypass

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

percutaneous coronary stenting with drug eluding stents

Intervention Type DEVICE

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)

coronary bypass

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age at least 18 years old
2. Patients with either Type I or Type II diabetes with a documented HbA1c greater than site ULN (If not on diabetic medication must be confirmed by a blood glucose of \>126 mg/dL fasting, or \>200mg/dL non-fasting); OR on diabetic medication with a documented physician diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.
3. No child bearing potential (if female)
4. Patient competent to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria

5. Congenital heart disease
6. Coronary bypass surgery within the preceding one year
7. Need for concomitant cardiac surgery
8. AHA Class III decompensated heart failure or AHA Class IV heart failure
9. Undergoing PCI for hemodynamic instability related to acute STEMI
10. History of a hemorrhagic stroke
11. Severe bleeding diathesis
12. History of chronic pancreatitis
13. A severe co-morbid condition that is expected to limit life to less than two years
14. Embolic stroke in the past six months
15. Significant GI bleed within the last one month
16. Lack of adequate surgical conduit
17. Sensitivity to clopidogrel (Plavix)
18. Sensitivity to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors
19. Chronic systemic steroid use
20. Participation in another trial with active intervention
21. Patient unable to be adequately followed
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

US Department of Veterans Affairs

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Masoor Kamalesh, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Richard Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Medical Center, Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

VA Palo Alto Health Care System

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

VA Greater Los Angeles HCS, Sepulveda

Sepulveda, California, United States

Site Status

VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, DC

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Richard Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton Campus

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Minneapolis

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

New York Harbor HCS

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Asheville

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Durham

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Cleveland

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Oklahoma City

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Ralph H Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Memphis

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

VA South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kamalesh M, Sharp TG, Tang XC, Shunk K, Ward HB, Walsh J, King S 3rd, Colling C, Moritz T, Stroupe K, Reda D; VA CARDS Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass surgery in United States veterans with diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Feb 26;61(8):808-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.044.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23428214 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

557

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.