Post-Operative Drainage Following Lymph Node Dissection
NCT ID: NCT00324272
Last Updated: 2011-08-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-01-31
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating the Use of Fibrin Tissue Adhesive in Melanoma Patients
NCT00506311
Early Complications After Axillary and Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Stage III Melanoma Patients
NCT04680182
Omitting Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma (Stage 3) and Major Pathological Response in the Index Lymph Node
NCT06754904
Minimally Invasive Groin Dissection for Melanoma
NCT01500304
Neoadjuvant Combination Immunotherapy for Stage III Melanoma
NCT03842943
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Lymph node dissection is undertaken for the control of malignant disease - frequently malignant melanoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Following groin or axillary dissection, excessive post operative drainage may necessitate the presence of wound drains for 10 days or more. This may prolong hospital stay in some patients, and may be associated with an increased complication rate (such as wound infection).
Hypothesis: the use of fibrin sealant prior to wound closure following either groin or axillary dissection may reduce post-operative wound drainage.
Comparison: patients who require an elective groin or axillary dissection who either undergo standard wound closure or those who have fibrin sealant instilled into the surgical wound prior to wound closure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Groin dissection: sealant used.
Fibrin Sealant (Tisseel) used in the Experimental Arm.
For patients in the Experimental (Treatment) Arm, 4 ml of Tisseel fibrin sealant were instilled into the wound using the Duploject™ spray delivery system prior to wound closure. Tisseel™ fibrin sealant was provided by Baxter Healthcare Ltd., Newbury, Berkshire, UK.
For patients in the Active Comparator (Control) Arm, no fibrin sealant was used during wound closure (with the surgical procedure being identical in all other respects).
Groin dissection: no sealant used.
Fibrin Sealant (Tisseel) used in the Experimental Arm.
For patients in the Experimental (Treatment) Arm, 4 ml of Tisseel fibrin sealant were instilled into the wound using the Duploject™ spray delivery system prior to wound closure. Tisseel™ fibrin sealant was provided by Baxter Healthcare Ltd., Newbury, Berkshire, UK.
For patients in the Active Comparator (Control) Arm, no fibrin sealant was used during wound closure (with the surgical procedure being identical in all other respects).
Axillary dissection: sealant used.
Fibrin Sealant (Tisseel) used in the Experimental Arm.
For patients in the Experimental (Treatment) Arm, 4 ml of Tisseel fibrin sealant were instilled into the wound using the Duploject™ spray delivery system prior to wound closure. Tisseel™ fibrin sealant was provided by Baxter Healthcare Ltd., Newbury, Berkshire, UK.
For patients in the Active Comparator (Control) Arm, no fibrin sealant was used during wound closure (with the surgical procedure being identical in all other respects).
Axillary dissection: no sealant used.
Fibrin Sealant (Tisseel) used in the Experimental Arm.
For patients in the Experimental (Treatment) Arm, 4 ml of Tisseel fibrin sealant were instilled into the wound using the Duploject™ spray delivery system prior to wound closure. Tisseel™ fibrin sealant was provided by Baxter Healthcare Ltd., Newbury, Berkshire, UK.
For patients in the Active Comparator (Control) Arm, no fibrin sealant was used during wound closure (with the surgical procedure being identical in all other respects).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fibrin Sealant (Tisseel) used in the Experimental Arm.
For patients in the Experimental (Treatment) Arm, 4 ml of Tisseel fibrin sealant were instilled into the wound using the Duploject™ spray delivery system prior to wound closure. Tisseel™ fibrin sealant was provided by Baxter Healthcare Ltd., Newbury, Berkshire, UK.
For patients in the Active Comparator (Control) Arm, no fibrin sealant was used during wound closure (with the surgical procedure being identical in all other respects).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Requiring groin or axillary lymph node dissection for malignant disease.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unable to speak English.
* Patients with learning difficulties.
* Patients with mental illness.
* Prisoners.
* Other vulnerable groups.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
INDUSTRY
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Henk P. Giele, MBBS FRACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UK: National Health Service
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Oliver DW, Hamilton SA, Figle AA, Wood SH, Lamberty BG. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of the use of fibrin sealant for face lifts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Dec;108(7):2101-5, discussion 2106-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00044.
Moore MM, Nguyen DH, Spotnitz WD. Fibrin sealant reduces serous drainage and allows for earlier drain removal after axillary dissection: a randomized prospective trial. Am Surg. 1997 Jan;63(1):97-102.
Berger A, Tempfer C, Hartmann B, Kornprat P, Rossmann A, Neuwirth G, Tulusan A, Kubista E. Sealing of postoperative axillary leakage after axillary lymphadenectomy using a fibrin glue coated collagen patch: a prospective randomised study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 May;67(1):9-14. doi: 10.1023/a:1010671209279.
Giovannacci L, Renggli JC, Eugster T, Stierli P, Hess P, Gurke L. Reduction of groin lymphatic complications by application of fibrin glue: preliminary results of a randomized study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2001 Mar;15(2):182-5. doi: 10.1007/s100160010049. Epub 2001 Mar 1.
Jain PK, Sowdi R, Anderson AD, MacFie J. Randomized clinical trial investigating the use of drains and fibrin sealant following surgery for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):54-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4435.
Swan MC, Oliver DW, Cassell OC, Coleman DJ, Williams N, Morritt DG, Giele HP. Randomized controlled trial of fibrin sealant to reduce postoperative drainage following elective lymph node dissection. Br J Surg. 2011 Jul;98(7):918-24. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7462. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C02.240
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.