Comparison of Epoetin Alfa and Epoetin Omega in Anemic Dialysis Patients:Results of Efficacy Trial

NCT ID: NCT00322413

Last Updated: 2006-07-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1997-01-31

Study Completion Date

1997-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The two epoetins, Epoetin alfa, a well established drug to treat renal anemia and Epoetin Omega, that differs from Epoetin alfa in the sugar moiety of the molecule were compared in regard of efficacy and safety to treat end stage renal disease anemia. Study hypothesis was that Epoetin Omega is non-inferior to Epoetin alfa in correcting renal anemia in dialysis patients. A 12-weeks randomized comparative efficacy study was performed including 77 end stage renal disease patients (epoetin omega:n=39, epoetin alfa: n=38). In the intent-to-treat analysis, average weekly difference in hemoglobin versus baseline value was higher in omega-treated patients: 1.94+-0.81 vs. 1.23+-0.62 g/dl. The unadjusted and adjusted omega-alfa differences were 0.71 g/dl (95%CI 0.38 to 1.04; p\<0.001) and 0.78 g/dl (0.49 to 1.08;p\<0.001), respectively. Average weekly epoetin dose was lower in the omega group: 87+-25 vs. 108+-21 IU/kg. The unadjusted and adjusted omega-alfa differences were -21IU/kg (-32 to -11; p\<0.001) and -24IU/kg (-35 to -13; p\<0.001), respectively. Epoetins were comparably well tolerated. In dialysis patients, subcutaneous epoetin omega apparently provides a greater anti-anemic effect per administered dose (IU) than epoetin alfa.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The two epoetins, Epoetin alfa, a well established drug to treat renal anemia and Epoetin Omega, that differs from Epoetin alfa in the sugar moiety of the molecule were compared in regard of efficacy and safety to treat end stage renal disease anemia. Study hypothesis was that Epoetin Omega is non-inferior to Epoetin alfa in correcting renal anemia in dialysis patients. A 12-weeks randomized comparative efficacy study was performed including 77 end stage renal disease patients (epoetin omega:n=39, epoetin alfa: n=38). All patients were anemic (Hemoglobin \< 90 g/L), treated by regular hemodialysis and without signs of bleeding, hemolysis, inflammation or history of major surgery.Treatment was started with 50 IU/kg body weight subcutaneously per week and thereafter adjusted according to the hemoglobin response. In the intent-to-treat analysis, average weekly difference in hemoglobin versus baseline value was higher in omega-treated patients: 1.94+-0.81 vs. 1.23+-0.62 g/dl. The unadjusted and adjusted omega-alfa differences were 0.71 g/dl (95%CI 0.38 to 1.04; p\<0.001) and 0.78 g/dl (0.49 to 1.08;p\<0.001), respectively. Average weekly epoetin dose was lower in the omega group: 87+-25 vs. 108+-21 IU/kg. The unadjusted and adjusted omega-alfa differences were -21IU/kg (-32 to -11; p\<0.001) and -24IU/kg (-35 to -13; p\<0.001), respectively. Epoetins were comparably well tolerated. In dialysis patients, subcutaneous epoetin omega apparently provides a greater anti-anemic effect per administered dose (IU) than epoetin alfa.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Renal Disease Renal Anemia Regular Dialysis Treatment

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Epoetin alfa Epoetin omega Comparative efficacy trial Renal anemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Epoetin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* End stage renal disease
* Regular dialysis treatment
* Renal anemia (hemoglobin\<9.0 g/dl)
* Age \> 18 years
* Adequate iron stores (TIBC saturation \> 20%, ferritin \>200)

Exclusion Criteria

* Signs of bleeding
* Major surgery in previous 60 days
* Hemolysis
* Other causes of anemia
* Cancer
* Inflammatory diseases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

General Hospital Sveti Duh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Slobodan Milutinovic, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, General Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, General Hospital Sveti Duh

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Croatia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Milutinovic S, Trkulja V. Reduced responsiveness to epoetin at re-exposure after prolonged epoetin-free period in anemic hemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease. Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):424-32.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16758521 (View on PubMed)

Chung EY, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Tonelli M, Strippoli GF. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 13;2(2):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36791280 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Epo-Comp-00-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id