A Study of Clofarabine and Cytarabine for Older Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)(CLASSIC I)
NCT ID: NCT00317642
Last Updated: 2014-04-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
326 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-08-31
2012-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There is no recommended standard treatment for relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia in older patients. Cytarabine is the most commonly used drug to treat these patients. This study will determine if there is benefit by combining clofarabine with cytarabine. Patients will be randomized to receive up to 3 cycles of treatment with either placebo in combination with cytarabine or clofarabine in combination with cytarabine. Randomization was stratified by remission status following the first induction regimen (no remission \[i.e., CR1 = refractory\] or remission \<6 months vs CR1 = remission ≥6 months). CR1 is defined as remission after first pre-study induction regimen. The safety and tolerability of clofarabine in combination with cytarabine and cytarabine alone will be monitored throughout the study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study of Clofarabine for Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) (CLASSIC II)
NCT00373529
Phase II Study of Clofarabine in Adult Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT00044889
Phase II Study of Clofarabine in Pediatric Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Patients
NCT00042354
A Study of Clofarabine in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) for Whom Chemotherapy Is Not Suitable
NCT00924443
Oral Clofarabine for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00727766
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Two clinical study reports were written for this study.
1. Clinical study report dated 7 April 2011 includes the entire treatment period of all participants plus much of the follow-up. At that time, 33 participants in the Clofarabine+cytarabine group and 29 participants in the placebo+cytarabine group were still being follow-up post treatment. Results were reported on clinicaltrials.gov in August 2011. Outcomes that used strata reported the 'calculated strata' on clinicaltrials.gov.
2. Clinical study report dated 9 July 2012 includes all patient treatment experience plus all long-term follow-up (a minimum of 2 years from the end of treatment or until the patient died). The study was completed at that time. Outcomes that used strata reported the 'randomized strata' on clinicaltrials.gov. AE records on clinicaltrials.gov reflect the final database.
Outcomes that changed between the two clinical study reports due to the additional long-term follow-up data are reported twice on clinicaltrials.gov (once from each clinical study report) and the appropriate report date is included in the outcome description. Outcomes from the 9 July 2012 report represent more complete data.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
clofarabine (IV formulation) and cytarabine
Participants received clofarabine (40 mg/m\^2) administered as a 1-hour infusion followed 3 hours later (from end of infusion) by cytarabine 1 g/m\^2 administered as a 2-hour infusion. Participants could receive up to 3 cycles of treatment (induction, re-induction, and consolidation)
Complete induction cycle = 5 consecutive days of treatment
Re-induction cycle = 5 consecutive days of treatment at the original or modified dose
Consolidation cycle = 4 consecutive days of treatment at the original or modified dose
clofarabine (IV formulation)
clofarabine (IV formulation) infusion 40mg/m\^2 / day up to 3 cycles
cytarabine
cytarabine IV infusion 1g/m\^2/day for up to 3 cycles
placebo and cytarabine
Participants received placebo administered as a 1-hour infusion followed 3 hours later (from end of infusion) by cytarabine 1 g/m\^2 administered as a 2-hour infusion. Patients could receive up to 3 cycles of treatment (induction, re-induction, and consolidation)
placebo
placebo (sodium Chloride) 1-hour IV infusion
cytarabine
cytarabine IV infusion 1g/m\^2/day for up to 3 cycles
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
clofarabine (IV formulation)
clofarabine (IV formulation) infusion 40mg/m\^2 / day up to 3 cycles
placebo
placebo (sodium Chloride) 1-hour IV infusion
cytarabine
cytarabine IV infusion 1g/m\^2/day for up to 3 cycles
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Relapsed after receiving up to 2 prior induction regimens (i.e. first or second relapse)or are refractory to not more than one prior combination chemotherapy induction regimen
* Be ≥ 55 years of age
* Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2
* Be able to comply with study procedures and follow-up examinations
* Be nonfertile or agree to use birth control during the study through the end of treatment visit and for at least 90 days after the last dose of study drug
* Have adequate liver and renal function as indicated by certain laboratory values
Exclusion Criteria
* Received bolus, intermediate or high-dose cytarabine as induction therapy unless certain remission criteria are met
* Have received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) within the previous 3 months
* Have moderate or severe graft versus host disease (GVHD), whether acute or chronic
* Are receiving any other chemotherapy or investigational therapy. Patients must have been off prior AML therapy for at least 2-6 weeks prior to entering study.
* Have a psychiatric disorder that would interfere with consent, study participation, or follow-up
* Have an active, uncontrolled infection
* Have any other severe concurrent disease, or have a history of serious organ dysfunction or disease involving the heart, kidney, liver, or other organ system
* Have been diagnosed with another malignancy, unless disease-free for at least 5 years; patients with treated nonmelanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, regardless of the disease-free duration, are eligible for this study if definitive treatment for the condition has been completed; patients with organ-confined prostate cancer with no evidence of recurrent or progressive disease are eligible if hormonal therapy has been initiated or the malignancy has been surgically removed.
* Have clinical evidence suggestive of central nervous system (CNS) involvement with leukemia unless lumbar puncture confirms absence of leukemic blasts in the cerebrospinal fluid(CSF)
* Known HIV positivity
* Are pregnant or lactating
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Medical Monitor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinical Hospital
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona, United States
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Cancer Research Center
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Scripps Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
UCLA School of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Southern California, Kenneth Norris Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
Stanford, California, United States
University of Colorado Health Science Center
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Rocky Mountain Cancer Center
Denver, Colorado, United States
Cancer Center of Central Connecticut
Southington, Connecticut, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Evanston Northwestern Healthcare
Evanston, Illinois, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
University of Kentucky, Markey Cancer Center
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Louisiana State University Health Science Center
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Harold Alfond Center for Cancer Care
Augusta, Maine, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Josephine Ford Cancer Center
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
The Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Center
Buffalo, New York, United States
Mt. Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
New York Medical Center
Valhalla, New York, United States
Mecklenburg Medical Group
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Gabrail Cancer Center
Canton, Ohio, United States
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Oregon Health Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas
San Antonio, Texas, United States
University of Texas Health Sciences Center
San Antonio, Texas, United States
University of Utah - Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
West Virginia University Hospitals, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
Juravinski Cancer Center
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Service Maladies du Sang, CHU Angers
Angers, , France
Hopital Claude Huriez CHRU de Lille
Lille, , France
Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, , France
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, , France
Hopital Hotel Dieu
Nantes, , France
Hopital Purpan
Toulouse, , France
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Zentrum fur Innere Medizin, Abt. Haematologie / Onkologie
Hanover, , Germany
Medizinische Klinik der Technischen, Universität München
Munich, , Germany
Universitatsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, , Germany
Ospedali Riuniti Bergamo
Bergamo, , Italy
A.O Ospedale Niguarda Ca'Granda
Milan, , Italy
N.O. San Gerardo
Monza, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera "Antonio Cardarelli"
Napoli, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Clofarabine + Ara-c improves response rates and event-free survival, not overall survival, in older patients with relapsed/refractory AML compared to Ara-c alone: Updated CLASSIC I study results. H.M. Kantarjian, M. Wetzler, D. Rizzieri, G. J. Schiller, M. H. Jagasia, R. K. Stuart, S. Ganguly, D. Avigan, M. Craig, R. Collins, M. B. Maris, T. Kovacsovics, S. Goldberg, K. Seiter, P. Hari, J. Greiner, N. Vey, C. Recher, F. Ravandi, E.S. Wang, S. Eckert, D. Huebner and S. Faderl. Haematologica - 16th Congress of EHA Abstracts. 2011; 96(S2): 196.
Clofarabine plus cytarabine compared to cytarabine alone in older patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML): Results from the phase III CLASSIC 1 trial. S. Faderl, M. Wetzler, D. Rizzieri, G. J. Schiller, M. H. Jagasia, R. K. Stuart, S. Ganguly, D. Avigan, M. Craig, R. Collins, M. B. Maris, T. Kovacsovics, S. Goldberg, K. Seiter, P. Hari, F. Ravandi, E. S. Wang, S. Eckert, D. Huebner, and H. Kantarjian JCO - ASCO Meeting Abstracts. 2011; 29:6503.
Faderl S, Wetzler M, Rizzieri D, Schiller G, Jagasia M, Stuart R, Ganguly S, Avigan D, Craig M, Collins R, Maris M, Kovacsovics T, Goldberg S, Seiter K, Hari P, Greiner J, Vey N, Recher C, Ravandi F, Wang ES, Vasconcelles M, Huebner D, Kantarjian HM. Clofarabine plus cytarabine compared with cytarabine alone in older patients with relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia: results from the CLASSIC I Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2492-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.9743. Epub 2012 May 14.
Ganguly S, Kantarjian HM, Wetzler M, Rizzieri D, Schiller G, Jagasia M, et al. Subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) associated with longer survival in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after Clo+Ara-C or Ara-C alone: a landmark analysis from the CLASSIC I trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012;18(2Suppl):S211-S212.
Ganguly S, Kantarjian HM, Wetzler M, Rizzieri D, Schiller G, Jagasia M, et al. Subsequent HSCT in the CLASSIC I Study Associated with Longer Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory AML After Clo+Ara-C Or Ara-C Alone: A Landmark Analysis. Haematologica - 17th Congress of EHA Abstracts. 2012; 97(s1):32
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-001043-19
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CLO34100405
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.