A Study of Clofarabine and Cytarabine for Older Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)(CLASSIC I)

NCT ID: NCT00317642

Last Updated: 2014-04-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

326 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-08-31

Study Completion Date

2012-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clofarabine (injection) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of pediatric patients 1 to 21 years old with relapsed acute or refractory lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have had at least 2 prior treatment regimens.

There is no recommended standard treatment for relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia in older patients. Cytarabine is the most commonly used drug to treat these patients. This study will determine if there is benefit by combining clofarabine with cytarabine. Patients will be randomized to receive up to 3 cycles of treatment with either placebo in combination with cytarabine or clofarabine in combination with cytarabine. Randomization was stratified by remission status following the first induction regimen (no remission \[i.e., CR1 = refractory\] or remission \<6 months vs CR1 = remission ≥6 months). CR1 is defined as remission after first pre-study induction regimen. The safety and tolerability of clofarabine in combination with cytarabine and cytarabine alone will be monitored throughout the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After screening and eligibility assessment, patients were randomized (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive either clofarabine or matching placebo, in addition to cytarabine. Randomization was stratified by remission status following the first induction regimen (CR1): no remission \[i.e., CR1 = refractory\] or remission \<6 months vs remission ≥6 months. During randomization by interactive voice response system (IVRS), there were 10 participants misclassified to the CR1 \<6 months stratum and 12 participants misclassified to CR1 ≥6 months stratum. The error did not affect the participants' treatment, only the stratification. Due to the misclassification, outcomes that used strata in their analysis were analyzed twice: once with the 'randomized stratification' which includes the misclassification and once with the 'calculated stratification' in which participants appear in the 'correct' strata.

Two clinical study reports were written for this study.

1. Clinical study report dated 7 April 2011 includes the entire treatment period of all participants plus much of the follow-up. At that time, 33 participants in the Clofarabine+cytarabine group and 29 participants in the placebo+cytarabine group were still being follow-up post treatment. Results were reported on clinicaltrials.gov in August 2011. Outcomes that used strata reported the 'calculated strata' on clinicaltrials.gov.
2. Clinical study report dated 9 July 2012 includes all patient treatment experience plus all long-term follow-up (a minimum of 2 years from the end of treatment or until the patient died). The study was completed at that time. Outcomes that used strata reported the 'randomized strata' on clinicaltrials.gov. AE records on clinicaltrials.gov reflect the final database.

Outcomes that changed between the two clinical study reports due to the additional long-term follow-up data are reported twice on clinicaltrials.gov (once from each clinical study report) and the appropriate report date is included in the outcome description. Outcomes from the 9 July 2012 report represent more complete data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

clofarabine (IV formulation) and cytarabine

Participants received clofarabine (40 mg/m\^2) administered as a 1-hour infusion followed 3 hours later (from end of infusion) by cytarabine 1 g/m\^2 administered as a 2-hour infusion. Participants could receive up to 3 cycles of treatment (induction, re-induction, and consolidation)

Complete induction cycle = 5 consecutive days of treatment

Re-induction cycle = 5 consecutive days of treatment at the original or modified dose

Consolidation cycle = 4 consecutive days of treatment at the original or modified dose

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

clofarabine (IV formulation)

Intervention Type DRUG

clofarabine (IV formulation) infusion 40mg/m\^2 / day up to 3 cycles

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine IV infusion 1g/m\^2/day for up to 3 cycles

placebo and cytarabine

Participants received placebo administered as a 1-hour infusion followed 3 hours later (from end of infusion) by cytarabine 1 g/m\^2 administered as a 2-hour infusion. Patients could receive up to 3 cycles of treatment (induction, re-induction, and consolidation)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo (sodium Chloride) 1-hour IV infusion

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine IV infusion 1g/m\^2/day for up to 3 cycles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

clofarabine (IV formulation)

clofarabine (IV formulation) infusion 40mg/m\^2 / day up to 3 cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

placebo (sodium Chloride) 1-hour IV infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine

cytarabine IV infusion 1g/m\^2/day for up to 3 cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Clolar® Evoltra®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have a diagnosis of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification
* Relapsed after receiving up to 2 prior induction regimens (i.e. first or second relapse)or are refractory to not more than one prior combination chemotherapy induction regimen
* Be ≥ 55 years of age
* Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2
* Be able to comply with study procedures and follow-up examinations
* Be nonfertile or agree to use birth control during the study through the end of treatment visit and for at least 90 days after the last dose of study drug
* Have adequate liver and renal function as indicated by certain laboratory values

Exclusion Criteria

* Received previous treatment with clofarabine
* Received bolus, intermediate or high-dose cytarabine as induction therapy unless certain remission criteria are met
* Have received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) within the previous 3 months
* Have moderate or severe graft versus host disease (GVHD), whether acute or chronic
* Are receiving any other chemotherapy or investigational therapy. Patients must have been off prior AML therapy for at least 2-6 weeks prior to entering study.
* Have a psychiatric disorder that would interfere with consent, study participation, or follow-up
* Have an active, uncontrolled infection
* Have any other severe concurrent disease, or have a history of serious organ dysfunction or disease involving the heart, kidney, liver, or other organ system
* Have been diagnosed with another malignancy, unless disease-free for at least 5 years; patients with treated nonmelanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, regardless of the disease-free duration, are eligible for this study if definitive treatment for the condition has been completed; patients with organ-confined prostate cancer with no evidence of recurrent or progressive disease are eligible if hormonal therapy has been initiated or the malignancy has been surgically removed.
* Have clinical evidence suggestive of central nervous system (CNS) involvement with leukemia unless lumbar puncture confirms absence of leukemic blasts in the cerebrospinal fluid(CSF)
* Known HIV positivity
* Are pregnant or lactating
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Monitor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinical Hospital

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Arizona Cancer Center

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Cancer Research Center

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Scripps Cancer Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA School of Medicine

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of Southern California, Kenneth Norris Cancer Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Health Science Center

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mountain Cancer Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Central Connecticut

Southington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evanston Northwestern Healthcare

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Kentucky, Markey Cancer Center

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisiana State University Health Science Center

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Harold Alfond Center for Cancer Care

Augusta, Maine, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Josephine Ford Cancer Center

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

The Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Roswell Park Cancer Center

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Mt. Sinai School of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Medical Center

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

Mecklenburg Medical Group

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Gabrail Cancer Center

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Tennessee Medical Center

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Sarah Cannon Research Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Care Centers of South Texas

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Health Sciences Center

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah - Huntsman Cancer Institute

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University Hospitals, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Saint John Regional Hospital

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Juravinski Cancer Center

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Service Maladies du Sang, CHU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

Hopital Claude Huriez CHRU de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hopital Edouard Herriot

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Institut Paoli Calmettes

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hopital Hotel Dieu

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Hopital Purpan

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Zentrum fur Innere Medizin, Abt. Haematologie / Onkologie

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Klinik der Technischen, Universität München

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Universitatsklinikum Ulm

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Ospedali Riuniti Bergamo

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

A.O Ospedale Niguarda Ca'Granda

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

N.O. San Gerardo

Monza, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera "Antonio Cardarelli"

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada France Germany Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clofarabine + Ara-c improves response rates and event-free survival, not overall survival, in older patients with relapsed/refractory AML compared to Ara-c alone: Updated CLASSIC I study results. H.M. Kantarjian, M. Wetzler, D. Rizzieri, G. J. Schiller, M. H. Jagasia, R. K. Stuart, S. Ganguly, D. Avigan, M. Craig, R. Collins, M. B. Maris, T. Kovacsovics, S. Goldberg, K. Seiter, P. Hari, J. Greiner, N. Vey, C. Recher, F. Ravandi, E.S. Wang, S. Eckert, D. Huebner and S. Faderl. Haematologica - 16th Congress of EHA Abstracts. 2011; 96(S2): 196.

Reference Type RESULT

Clofarabine plus cytarabine compared to cytarabine alone in older patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML): Results from the phase III CLASSIC 1 trial. S. Faderl, M. Wetzler, D. Rizzieri, G. J. Schiller, M. H. Jagasia, R. K. Stuart, S. Ganguly, D. Avigan, M. Craig, R. Collins, M. B. Maris, T. Kovacsovics, S. Goldberg, K. Seiter, P. Hari, F. Ravandi, E. S. Wang, S. Eckert, D. Huebner, and H. Kantarjian JCO - ASCO Meeting Abstracts. 2011; 29:6503.

Reference Type RESULT

Faderl S, Wetzler M, Rizzieri D, Schiller G, Jagasia M, Stuart R, Ganguly S, Avigan D, Craig M, Collins R, Maris M, Kovacsovics T, Goldberg S, Seiter K, Hari P, Greiner J, Vey N, Recher C, Ravandi F, Wang ES, Vasconcelles M, Huebner D, Kantarjian HM. Clofarabine plus cytarabine compared with cytarabine alone in older patients with relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia: results from the CLASSIC I Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2492-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.9743. Epub 2012 May 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22585697 (View on PubMed)

Ganguly S, Kantarjian HM, Wetzler M, Rizzieri D, Schiller G, Jagasia M, et al. Subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) associated with longer survival in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after Clo+Ara-C or Ara-C alone: a landmark analysis from the CLASSIC I trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012;18(2Suppl):S211-S212.

Reference Type RESULT

Ganguly S, Kantarjian HM, Wetzler M, Rizzieri D, Schiller G, Jagasia M, et al. Subsequent HSCT in the CLASSIC I Study Associated with Longer Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory AML After Clo+Ara-C Or Ara-C Alone: A Landmark Analysis. Haematologica - 17th Congress of EHA Abstracts. 2012; 97(s1):32

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001043-19

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CLO34100405

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.