Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
433 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1997-01-31
2004-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Return to Work Interventions for Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT00329342
The Effect of Workplace Interventions on the Treatment of Low-back Pain
NCT03481426
Effects of Lumbar Repositioning Feedback and Transversus Abdominis Training on Lumbar Propricption in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain
NCT05047614
Reducing Sedentary Behavior to Decrease Low Back Pain: Stand Back Study
NCT02624687
Effectiveness of Adding Behavioral Therapy to Physical Therapy to Treat Low Back Pain
NCT00373867
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
METHODS This is a randomized clinical trial in which 433 active employees with low back disorders were randomly assigned to one of two study groups: 1) back support plus education on back health; or 2) education on back health only. Demographic, health, medical, and job factors were recorded. Outcomes were evaluated over a twelve month period and included self-reported measures of back pain, back pain disability level, physical health, mental health, back pain recurrence and administrative measures.
RESULTS Significant improvements in physical health, neurogenic symptoms, back pain disability, and low back pain were observed over time in both study groups. However, there was no significant difference between the study groups with respect to these outcome measures. The adjusted hazard ratio of recurrence rate was suggestive of an incremental protective effect due to back supports over education alone (adjusted hazard ratio \[AHR\]=0.711, 95% CI 0.50, 1.04, p=.085). There was also a marginal effect of back supports and education on decreasing low back pain over time (AHR=0.0015, p=0.091).
CONCLUSIONS Back supports may have some value in promoting recovery from low back pain, but this effect is only observed in individuals who are actively employed in jobs with medium risk of low back disorders.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Back supports
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
64 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The UAW-GM National Joint Committee on Health & Safety
UNKNOWN
Rush University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rush University Medical Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Denise M Oleske, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rush University Medical Center
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Oleske DM, Lavender SA, Andersson GB, Morrissey MJ, Zold-Kilbourn P, Allen C, Taylor E. Risk factors for recurrent episodes of work-related low back disorders in an industrial population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):789-98. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000207017.30490.28.
Oleske DM, Neelakantan J, Andersson GB, Hinrichs BG, Lavender SA, Morrissey MJ, Zold-Kilbourn P, Taylor E. Factors affecting recovery from work-related, low back disorders in autoworkers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Aug;85(8):1362-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.021.
Oleske D, Lavender S, Andersson G, Hahn J, Zold-Kilbourn P, Allen-Toole C, Laskowski J. Job exposures as correlates of recovery in population-based rehabilitation intervention for work-related low back disorders. Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Oct 1;10(7):481. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00165-4.
Oleske DM, Andersson GB, Lavender SA, Hahn JJ. Association between recovery outcomes for work-related low back disorders and personal, family, and work factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 May 15;25(10):1259-65. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200005150-00010.
Lavender SA, Oleske DM, Nicholson L, Andersson GB, Hahn J. Comparison of five methods used to determine low back disorder risk in a manufacturing environment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jul 15;24(14):1441-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907150-00009.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
#97-1-AP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
95050341
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.