Workplace Based Rehabilitation for Low Back Disorders

NCT ID: NCT00316342

Last Updated: 2023-07-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

433 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1997-01-31

Study Completion Date

2004-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of back supports plus education upon recovery from a work-related low back disorder. The study tests the hypothesis: the use of back supports plus health education is not different from health education alone in promoting recovery from a work-related low back disorder in consideration of personal, health, and job factors. Significant improvements in physical health, neurogenic symptoms, back pain disability, and low back pain were observed over the twelve months of study follow-up. No statistically significant difference between the study groups was found with respect to these measures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND Low back pain remains a common major source of morbidity and disability. Few studies consider the effectiveness of interventions for low back pain while simultaneously considering personal, health, and job characteristics.

METHODS This is a randomized clinical trial in which 433 active employees with low back disorders were randomly assigned to one of two study groups: 1) back support plus education on back health; or 2) education on back health only. Demographic, health, medical, and job factors were recorded. Outcomes were evaluated over a twelve month period and included self-reported measures of back pain, back pain disability level, physical health, mental health, back pain recurrence and administrative measures.

RESULTS Significant improvements in physical health, neurogenic symptoms, back pain disability, and low back pain were observed over time in both study groups. However, there was no significant difference between the study groups with respect to these outcome measures. The adjusted hazard ratio of recurrence rate was suggestive of an incremental protective effect due to back supports over education alone (adjusted hazard ratio \[AHR\]=0.711, 95% CI 0.50, 1.04, p=.085). There was also a marginal effect of back supports and education on decreasing low back pain over time (AHR=0.0015, p=0.091).

CONCLUSIONS Back supports may have some value in promoting recovery from low back pain, but this effect is only observed in individuals who are actively employed in jobs with medium risk of low back disorders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Back supports

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

work-related low back disorder, 18-64 years of age,active hourly worker, enrollment into study within eight weeks of diagnosis, signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

no other concurrent work-related condition not pregnant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The UAW-GM National Joint Committee on Health & Safety

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rush University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rush University Medical Center

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Denise M Oleske, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rush University Medical Center

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Oleske DM, Lavender SA, Andersson GB, Morrissey MJ, Zold-Kilbourn P, Allen C, Taylor E. Risk factors for recurrent episodes of work-related low back disorders in an industrial population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):789-98. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000207017.30490.28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16582853 (View on PubMed)

Oleske DM, Neelakantan J, Andersson GB, Hinrichs BG, Lavender SA, Morrissey MJ, Zold-Kilbourn P, Taylor E. Factors affecting recovery from work-related, low back disorders in autoworkers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Aug;85(8):1362-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.11.021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15295767 (View on PubMed)

Oleske D, Lavender S, Andersson G, Hahn J, Zold-Kilbourn P, Allen-Toole C, Laskowski J. Job exposures as correlates of recovery in population-based rehabilitation intervention for work-related low back disorders. Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Oct 1;10(7):481. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00165-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11018430 (View on PubMed)

Oleske DM, Andersson GB, Lavender SA, Hahn JJ. Association between recovery outcomes for work-related low back disorders and personal, family, and work factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 May 15;25(10):1259-65. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200005150-00010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10806503 (View on PubMed)

Lavender SA, Oleske DM, Nicholson L, Andersson GB, Hahn J. Comparison of five methods used to determine low back disorder risk in a manufacturing environment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jul 15;24(14):1441-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907150-00009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10423789 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

#97-1-AP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

95050341

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.