Efficacy of 851B Gel for Treating High-Risk Cervical Human Papillomavirus Infection in Women.

NCT ID: NCT00312286

Last Updated: 2016-09-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

538 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-04-30

Study Completion Date

2008-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy of 851B gel over a range of concentrations and dosing regimens on high-risk cervical human papillomavirus infection in women.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cervical cancer is caused by infection with specific genotypes of the human papillomavirus referred to as oncogenic or high-risk human papillomavirus. Current epidemiologic evidence suggests that 80% of sexually active women will become infected during their lifetime with human papillomavirus and 50% of these infections will be due to high-risk human papillomavirus. With US annual rates of cervical cancer now in the range of 13,000/year, a very substantial number of women are left with uncertainty regarding whether their infection will clear spontaneously or progress to cancer.

Subjects participating in this study were required to visit the clinic for approximately 15 or 16 visits, and maintain a diary of self-dosing and menstruation cycles. The total time of participation in this study was approximately 27 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Papillomavirus Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B 0.15% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 2 cycles.

2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B 1.5% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 1 cycle.

3

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B 1.5% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 2 cycles.

4

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B 3.0% formulation, gel, topically, once a week for 1 cycle.

5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B 3.0% formulation, gel, topically, once a week for 2 cycles.

6

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B 3.0% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 1 cycle.

7

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B 3.0% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 2 cycles.

8

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B placebo-matching gel, topically, once a week for 1 cycle.

9

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B placebo-matching gel, topically, twice a week for 1 cycle.

10

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B placebo-matching gel, topically, once a week for 2 cycles.

11

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

851B

Intervention Type DRUG

851B placebo-matching gel, topically, twice a week for 2 cycles.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

851B

851B 0.15% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 2 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B 1.5% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 1 cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B 1.5% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 2 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B 3.0% formulation, gel, topically, once a week for 1 cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B 3.0% formulation, gel, topically, once a week for 2 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B 3.0% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 1 cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B 3.0% formulation, gel, topically, twice a week for 2 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B placebo-matching gel, topically, once a week for 1 cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B placebo-matching gel, topically, twice a week for 1 cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B placebo-matching gel, topically, once a week for 2 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

851B

851B placebo-matching gel, topically, twice a week for 2 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A female subject of childbearing potential who is sexually active using contraception.
* Subject is willing to abstain from all sexual contact involving her genitalia for at least 24 hours prior to and 24 hours after study drug administration.
* Subject must be neither pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
* Subject has 1 of the following:

* Menstruating with a stable cycle and has at least 21 non-bleeding days.
* Amenorrheic (due to injectable or extended-cycle contraceptives).
* Subject is willing to refrain from using vaginal douche products during the treatment period and through the Follow-up Month 4 visit.
* Subject has a Pap test interpretation of either low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
* Subject has a uterine cervical sample that is high-risk human papillomavirus positive.

Exclusion Criteria

* The Subject has evidence of an uncontrolled, clinically significant medical condition as determined by the investigator.
* The Subject has a history of hemorrhagic diatheses or coagulopathy.
* The Subject has a history of toxic shock syndrome.
* The Subject has received any of the following medications in the timeframes listed below:

* 851 (in any form) or an active (non-placebo) human papillomavirus vaccine at any time prior to the screening visit.
* In the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit the subject has received:

* Interferon therapy or other therapies that promote a proinflammatory immune state, including:

* immunomodulators.
* cytotoxic drugs.
* drugs known to have major organ toxicity.
* Used a vaginal douche 72 hours prior to the screening visit.
* Received any investigational drug within 60 days of Study Day 1.
* Used in the 2 weeks prior to Study Day 1:

* oral or inhaled corticosteroids (\>1000 mcg/day, fluticasone propionate \>600 mg/day, or equivalent).
* systemic steroids.
* topical drugs to the anogenital area.
* NuvaRing.
* The Subject has a history of hypersensitivity to any components of the gel formulation or to iodine.
* The Subject has given birth or has had a spontaneous or induced abortion within 2 months of Study Day 1.
* The Subject uses an intrauterine device, diaphragm, NuvaRing, or additional contraceptive foam or gel for birth control.
* The Subject has:

* histology read as high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
* cytology read as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
* cytology read as atypical glandular cytological abnormalities.
* cytology read as atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude high grade.
* cervical carcinoma of any type.
* apparent endocervical involvement.
* high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.
* high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.
* If the limits of a cervical lesion cannot be readily visualized.
* If the limits of the transformation zone cannot be readily visualized.
* The subject has clinical evidence of a vaginal infection or sexually transmitted infection, other than cervical human papillomavirus infection at the Study Day 1 visit.
* The Subject has had a cervical biopsy within 1 month prior to the screening visit.
* The Subject has had any previous ablative or surgical treatment of the cervix within 3 months prior to the screening visit;
* The Subject has a history of alcoholism or substance abuse within 1 year or has current alcohol or substance abuse as assessed by the investigator.
* The Subject has tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus at the screening visit or has evidence of any other immunosuppressive disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Enterprise, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Colton, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Groton, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Leesburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Woodstock, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Marrero, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Paw Paw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

New Bern, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Gallipolis, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Watertown, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Clarksville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sandy City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Renton, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status

Rio Piedras, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Puerto Rico

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1127-5771

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1547-851B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.