Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-08-31
2007-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects:Younger gynaecologists (Postgraduate year 2-8) Half are having conventional training the other half is undergoing virtual reality simulator training before performing their first laparoscopic salpingectomy.
Outcome is measured by blinded video evaluation with criteria. The criteria is defined in the previous validated scoring system Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Simulator training
LapSimGyn training until expert proficiency level is reached
Two consecutive simulations reaching predefined expert level
2
Traditional Clinical education at operating room
Traditional clinical education
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LapSimGyn training until expert proficiency level is reached
Two consecutive simulations reaching predefined expert level
Traditional clinical education
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous training in simulator
25 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bent Ottesen, MD Dr.Sci
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28. doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924.
Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Schroeder TV, Ottesen BS. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009 May 14;338:b1802. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1802.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
959587647
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
KF 01283756
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id