Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of Self-Management on Improving Sleep Apnea Outcomes (NCT NCT00310310)
NCT ID: NCT00310310
Last Updated: 2017-04-20
Results Overview
The investigators examined the data obtained in the Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program at the one-month time point relative to participation in the Usual Care group.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
240 participants
1 month
2017-04-20
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited and screened from the Pulmonary Sleep/CPAP Clinic at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS). Project offices were based at the VASDHS HSR\&D unit.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Usual Care
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
120
|
120
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
90
|
100
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
30
|
20
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Effect of Self-Management on Improving Sleep Apnea Outcomes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=120 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=120 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
Total
n=240 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=93 Participants
|
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=4 Participants
|
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
116 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
234 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
120 participants
n=93 Participants
|
120 participants
n=4 Participants
|
240 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthThe investigators examined the data obtained in the Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program at the one-month time point relative to participation in the Usual Care group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=90 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=100 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
CPAP Adherence
|
2.8 hours per night
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
3.9 hours per night
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsThe investigators also examined the data obtained at the 6-month time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=90 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=100 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
CPAP Adherence
|
2.3 hours per night
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
3.1 hours per night
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 MonthPopulation: The target population for this study is all Veterans with OSA. It was expected that most participants would be middle-aged and older men and women, from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and with a full range of medical co-morbidities.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire aimed at assessing sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month period.79 The PSQI measures seven areas of sleep: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. Items are answered utilizing a Likert scale with 0 being indicative of better sleep and the maximum value of 3 being indicative of poor sleep. The PSQI has acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83), test-retest reliability of 0.85, and can distinguish good and poor sleepers (global PSQI score \> 5 has diagnostic sensitivity = 89.6% and specificity 86.5%). In scoring the PSQI, seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=90 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=100 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
|
8.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
8.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 MonthsPopulation: The target population for this study is all Veterans with OSA. It was expected that most participants would be middle-aged and older men and women, from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and with a full range of medical co-morbidities. We had a few Veterans who skipped this assessment when filling out the project assessment packet.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire aimed at assessing sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month period.79 The PSQI measures seven areas of sleep: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. Items are answered utilizing a Likert scale with 0 being indicative of better sleep and the maximum value of 3 being indicative of poor sleep. The PSQI has acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83), test-retest reliability of 0.85, and can distinguish good and poor sleepers (global PSQI score \> 5 has diagnostic sensitivity = 89.6% and specificity 86.5%). In scoring the PSQI, seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=78 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=89 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
|
8.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.6
|
8.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthSleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (SAQLI) which is a 35-item clinician-administered scale composed of five domains: daily functioning, social interactions, emotional functioning, symptoms, and CPAP side effects. . It has high internal consistency, strong content and construct validity, and adequate concurrent and discriminative validity, and is responsive to changes in HRQOL. The key advantages to inclusion of the SAQLI is that it is the only clinician-administered scale in the study and it contains a CPAP side effect scale that is one of the few valid measures of the frequency and amount of CPAP side effects. 1. A very large, All the time 2. A large 3. A moderate to large 4. A moderate 5. A small to moderate 6. A small 7. No, None, Not at all
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=90 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=100 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (SAQLI)
|
4.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
5.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthThe QWB-SA is a generic, preference-based measure that produces a single score appropriate for cost-effectiveness estimates and has been used in veteran and other general adult populations. The advantage of having a single, scaled score instead of multiple separate subscale domains is important for comparing interventions. The QWB-SA is a comprehensive measure of health-related quality of life that consists of 78-items and five sections: (I) acute and chronic symptoms; (II) self-care activities; (III) mobility; (IV) physical activity and performance of physical functioning; and (V) social activity. The level of functioning and the subjective symptom reports are then weighted by preference, or utility, on a scale that ranges from 0 (dead) to 1.0 (optimum function).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=90 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=100 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Well Being Scale (QWB-SA)
|
0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 014
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthSocial-cognitive theory (SCT) measure 1= Disagree Completely 5= Agree Completely 6= Not applicable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=90 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=100 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Efficacy
|
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
4.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthSocial-cognitive theory (SCT) measure 1= Not at all important 5= Extremely important 6= Not applicable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=90 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=100 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Outcome Expectation
|
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
4.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthThe CES-D is a 10-item self-report measure of depression. The 10-item version has adequate predictive accuracy when compared to the original full-length 20-item version, as well as adequate test-retest correlations and discriminative validity. The total score is calculated by finding the sum of 10 items. Any score equal to or above 10 is considered depressed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=90 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=100 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (Short Form)
|
7.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.9
|
7.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.777
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: The target population for this study is all Veterans with OSA. It was expected that most participants would be middle-aged and older men and women, from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and with a full range of medical co-morbidities.
ESS is a widely used subjective measure of excessive daytime sleepiness in research and clinical settings. Participants are asked to indicate how likely they would be to fall asleep in eight different situations on a scale from 0 (not likely) to 3 (highly likely). The situations are designed to vary in sleep-inducing capacity. The ESS scoring range is 0-24, with higher scores reflecting greater daytime sleepiness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care
n=90 Participants
Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
Usual care: Usual sleep apnea and cpap care
|
Self-Management
n=100 Participants
sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based
Sleep Apnea Self-Management Program: Sleep apnea self-management program - 4 sessions, group-based.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
|
9.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
8.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
Adverse Events
Usual Care
Self-Management
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place