Irinotecan With or Without Capecitabine as Second-Line Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Progressive, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00303745

Last Updated: 2008-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether irinotecan and capecitabine are more effective than irinotecan alone in treating colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying irinotecan and capecitabine to see how well they work as second-line therapy compared to irinotecan alone in treating older patients with progressive, metastatic colorectal cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Compare the objective response or stable disease rate in elderly patients with unresectable, progressive, metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan hydrochloride with vs without capecitabine.

Secondary

* Compare the tolerability of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare the quality of life and ability to maintain self-sufficiency of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the progression-free and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is an open-label, randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, WHO performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), number of associated comorbidities (Charlson index 0-2 vs \> 2), and age (75-79 vs ≥ 80). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II: Patients receive oral capecitabine on days 1-14 and irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then every 12 weeks thereafter.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 12 weeks.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 78 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

adenocarcinoma of the colon recurrent colon cancer stage IV colon cancer adenocarcinoma of the rectum recurrent rectal cancer stage IV rectal cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

irinotecan hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum

* Unresectable disease
* Documented progressive disease during first-line/palliative chemotherapy
* Measurable disease ≥ 1 cm that is outside prior radiation field
* No brain metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* WHO performance status 0-2
* Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
* No contraindication to chemotherapy
* Creatinine clearance ≥ 40 mL/min
* Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3 times normal (5 times normal if hepatic involvement)
* Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times normal
* Transaminases ≤ 5 times normal
* No symptomatic coronary disease or cardiac insufficiency
* No enteropathy or chronic diarrhea
* No unresolved intestinal occlusion or subocclusion
* No history of severe unexpected reaction to a fluoropyrimidine
* No other active malignancy in the past 2 years
* No hypersensitivity to irinotecan hydrochloride or its excipients
* No hypersensitivity to capecitabine or fluorouracil

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* See Disease Characteristics
* No prior extensive resection
* No concurrent sorivudine or similar analogs (e.g., brivudine)
* No other concurrent anticancer therapy
* Concurrent radiotherapy allowed for nontarget lesions
Minimum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emmanuel Mitry, MD, PhD

Role:

Hopital Ambroise Pare

Thomas Aparicio

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier d'Abbeville

Abbeville, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine

Boucher, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Pare - Boulogne

Boulogne, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier

Chalon-sur-Saône, , France

Site Status

Hopital Antoine Beclere

Clamart, , France

Site Status

Hopital Du Bocage

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Clinique Pasteur

Guilherand-Granges, , France

Site Status

CMC Les Ormeaux

Le Havre, , France

Site Status

C. H. Du Mans

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Hopital Robert Boulin

Libourne, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique des Quatre Pavillons

Lormont, , France

Site Status

CHR D'Orleans - Hopital de la Source

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Pitie-Salpetriere

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan

Perpignan, , France

Site Status

Hopital Sebastopol, C.H.U. de Reims

Reims, , France

Site Status

Centre Eugene Marquis

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Hopital Charles Nicolle

Rouen, , France

Site Status

C.H. Senlis

Senlis, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Tours - Hopital Trousseau

Tours, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier General - St. Nicolas

Verdun, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FFCD-0305

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EU-20545

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EUDRACT-2004-004742-40

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000453857

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id