Trial Outcomes & Findings for High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Oseltamivir to Treat Severe Influenza and Avian Influenza (NCT NCT00298233)
NCT ID: NCT00298233
Last Updated: 2014-06-06
Results Overview
Proportion of all participants with no detectable viral RNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a combined nasal and throat swab sample on day 5.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
326 participants
After 5 days of treatment
2014-06-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Standard Dose Oseltamivir Adult Cohort
All participants \>= 15 years received standard-dose oseltamivir (75 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function) for 5 to 10 days.
|
Double Dose Oseltamivir Adult Cohort
All Participants \>= 15 years received high-dose oseltamivir (150 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function) for 5 to 10 days.
|
Standard Dose Oseltamivir Child Cohort
All participants \<15 years received standard dose oseltamivir (75 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function) for 5 to 10 days.
|
Double Dose Oseltamivir Child Cohort
All Participants \<15 years received high-dose oseltamivir (150 mg twice daily orally or equivalent dose adjusted for age, weight, and kidney function) for 5 to 10 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
39
|
41
|
122
|
124
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
39
|
41
|
122
|
124
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Oseltamivir to Treat Severe Influenza and Avian Influenza
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Standarad Dose Oseltamivir
n=161 Participants
All participants that were randomized and received standard dose oseltamivir
|
Double Dose Oseltamivir
n=165 Participants
All participants that were randomized and received doubledose oseltamivir
|
Total
n=326 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Child cohort: ≥1 to <15 years
|
122 participants
n=5 Participants
|
124 participants
n=7 Participants
|
246 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Adult cohort: ≥15 years
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 participants
n=7 Participants
|
80 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
141 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
89 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
96 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
185 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: After 5 days of treatmentPopulation: All randomized patients with RT-PCR proven influenza.
Proportion of all participants with no detectable viral RNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a combined nasal and throat swab sample on day 5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double Dose Oseltamivir
n=159 Participants
All participants receiving double dose oseltamivir
|
Standard Dose Oseltamivir
n=154 Participants
All participants receiving standard dose oseltamivir
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of All Participants Negative for Viral RNA on Day 5
|
115 participants
|
105 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: After 5 days of treatmentPopulation: For the purpose of endpoint definition, death prior to or on Day 5 was also considered as clinical failure on day 5.In the double dose cohort, only 154 subjects completed fives days of drug and 7 died (total 161). In the standard dose cohort only 149 subjects completed 5 days of drug and 9 died (total 158).
Proportion of participants that have clinical failure by day 5. Subjects that meet one of the following on Day 5 will be classified as a clinical failure: * Severe tachypnea (respiratory rate ≥ 30 for ages ≥12 years, rate ≥ 40 for ages 6 to 12 years, rate ≥45 for ages 3 to 6 years, rate ≥ 50 for ages 1 to 3 years) * Severe dyspnea (unable to speak full sentences, or use of accessory respiratory muscles) * Arterial oxygen saturation ≤92% on room air by trans-cutaneous method * Need for mechanical ventilation or intensive care unit (ICU) admission For the purpose of endpoint definition, death prior to or on Day 5 will also be considered a clinical failure at Day 5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double Dose Oseltamivir
n=161 Participants
All participants receiving double dose oseltamivir
|
Standard Dose Oseltamivir
n=158 Participants
All participants receiving standard dose oseltamivir
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Meeting Criteria for Day 5 Clinical Failure
|
16 participants
|
20 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: After up to 10 days of treatmentStandard therapy with oseltamivir is five days. Those patients with persistent symptoms on day five were continued on the randomized dose for an additional five days and assessments were performed up to day 10.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double Dose Oseltamivir
n=165 Participants
All participants receiving double dose oseltamivir
|
Standard Dose Oseltamivir
n=161 Participants
All participants receiving standard dose oseltamivir
|
|---|---|---|
|
In-hospital Mortality Rates
|
12 participants
|
9 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Throughout study, 14 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
Double Dose Oseltamivir
n=165 Participants
All participants receiving double dose oseltamivir
|
Standard Dose Oseltamivir
n=161 Participants
All participants receiving standard dose oseltamivir
|
|---|---|---|
|
Median Time (Days) Receipt of Oxygen
|
3 days
95% Confidence Interval 2-5 • Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
3.5 days
95% Confidence Interval 2-7 • Interval 2.0 to 7.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Throughout study, 14 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
Double Dose Oseltamivir
n=165 Participants
All participants receiving double dose oseltamivir
|
Standard Dose Oseltamivir
n=161 Participants
All participants receiving standard dose oseltamivir
|
|---|---|---|
|
Median Time (Days) in ICU
|
4.4 days
Interval 3.0 to 6.0
|
5 days
Interval 2.0 to 11.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Throughout study, 14 daysUse of mechanical ventilation at any time for subjects with severe influenza and avian influenza.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Double Dose Oseltamivir
n=165 Participants
All participants receiving double dose oseltamivir
|
Standard Dose Oseltamivir
n=161 Participants
All participants receiving standard dose oseltamivir
|
|---|---|---|
|
Median Time (Days) on Ventilation
|
2.5 days
Interval 1.0 to 16.0
|
5 days
Interval 2.0 to 11.0
|
Adverse Events
Double Dose Oseltamivir
Standard Dose Oseltamivir
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Double Dose Oseltamivir
n=165 participants at risk
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of adverse events (AEs) per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
Standard Dose Oseltamivir
n=161 participants at risk
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of adverse events (AEs) per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Septic shock
|
0.61%
1/165 • Number of events 1 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
0.00%
0/161 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Double Dose Oseltamivir
n=165 participants at risk
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of adverse events (AEs) per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
Standard Dose Oseltamivir
n=161 participants at risk
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of adverse events (AEs) per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
respiratory failure
|
6.1%
10/165 • Number of events 10 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
3.1%
5/161 • Number of events 5 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
diarrhea
|
1.2%
2/165 • Number of events 2 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
5.6%
9/161 • Number of events 9 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
General disorders
multi-organ failures
|
1.8%
3/165 • Number of events 3 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
1.9%
3/161 • Number of events 3 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
1.2%
2/165 • Number of events 2 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
0.62%
1/161 • Number of events 1 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pneumothorax
|
0.61%
1/165 • Number of events 1 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
1.2%
2/161 • Number of events 2 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
neutropenia
|
1.2%
2/165 • Number of events 2 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
0.62%
1/161 • Number of events 1 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytosis
|
1.8%
3/165 • Number of events 3 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
0.00%
0/161 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.61%
1/165 • Number of events 1 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
0.62%
1/161 • Number of events 1 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/165 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
1.2%
2/161 • Number of events 2 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Septic shock
|
0.61%
1/165 • Number of events 1 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
1.2%
2/161 • Number of events 2 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
1.2%
2/165 • Number of events 2 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
0.62%
1/161 • Number of events 1 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
|
General disorders
other
|
6.1%
10/165 • Number of events 10 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
6.8%
11/161 • Number of events 11 • Through Day 28 for severe influenza, and Day 180 for avian influenza.
The study recorded only cumulative data (total number of AEs per type, per Arm, but not number of subjects affected per AE type). Therefore data are the number of events and not the number of participants with events.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Jeremy Farrar
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place