Implementation of an Evidence Based Smoking Cessation Strategy (SMOCC) for Patients With COPD in Primary Care

NCT ID: NCT00294905

Last Updated: 2010-09-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2700 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Study Completion Date

2008-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A controlled study demonstrated that a smoking cessation protocol in routine primary care, specifically targeted at patients with COPD (SMOCC), doubled the quit rates. The protocol was tested under optimal trial conditions, but it is unclear if a large-scale implementation strategy is (cost-)effective. Therefore the present study investigates a large scale implementation strategy in a 2-armed community intervention trial. The research question is how (cost-)effective this implementation strategy is compared to usual implementation procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

COPD is an increasing cause of death and morbidity and smoking is its primary cause. Professional smoking cessation treatment is very cost-effective and therefore recommended by national guidelines. A controlled study demonstrated that a smoking cessation protocol in routine primary care, specifically targeted at patients with COPD (SMOCC), doubled the quit rates. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was Euro 1012 showing that the protocol was cost-effective. The protocol was tested under optimal trial conditions, but it is unclear if a large-scale implementation strategy is (cost-)effective. Therefore the present study investigates an implementation strategy in a 2-armed community intervention trial. General practices (N=150, 2700 smoking patients with COPD) will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control condition. In the control condition the usual dissemination strategy of distributing guidelines and subsequent products through the professional channels (journals, postgraduate education) will take place. In the intervention condition a multifaceted implementation strategy wil be executed aimed at support of the general practice team (outreach education by a facilitator, support for detecting smoking patients with COPD, provision of patient education materials, help desk/website, telephone and e-mail reminders). The research question is how (cost-)effective this implementation strategy is compared to usual implementation procedures. Primary outcome measures will be biochemically validated smoking abstinence at 12 and 18 months. Secondary outcome measures will be counseling contacts and counseling behaviour of professionals and cessation attempts of patients. A process analysis and evaluations by patients and professionals are an integral part of the study. A cost-effectiveness analysis taking a health care sector perspective will be performed and will show the expected costs per practice and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The study will last 34 months, the intervention period will take 18 months per practice.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COPD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implementation of a combined smoking cessation strategy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* COPD
* Smoking
* Age 40 years or over

Exclusion Criteria

* Under control of lung specialist
* Not Dutch-speaking
* Serious physical of psychiatric comorbidity
* Under 40 years of age
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

R. Grol, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK)

117 Kwazo, Postbus 9101, 6500 Hb, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hilberink SR, Jacobs JE, Bottema BJ, de Vries H, Grol RP. Smoking cessation in patients with COPD in daily general practice (SMOCC): six months' results. Prev Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;41(5-6):822-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Oct 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16203030 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.wokresearch.nl

Site of the Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

945-16-104

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id