EEG Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Antidepressant Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00289523

Last Updated: 2012-03-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

375 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2007-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential early EEG predictors of an individual's response to treatment with antidepressant medications.

Objectives:

* Prospectively confirm accuracy of current EEG biomarker algorithm
* Determine preferred clinical intervention for subjects with negative indicator
* Identify predictors of worsening suicide ideation

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to recent clinical studies sponsored by the NIH, fewer than half of subjects diagnosed with a major depressive episode respond to the first trial of an antidepressant medication. While the majority of subjects eventually respond to treatment with an antidepressant, failure with the first line medication puts subjects at increased risk for never receiving adequate treatment of their depression.

Several lines of reasoning support the rationale for further investigating EEG as a means of predicting response and resistance to antidepressants. Prior studies suggest that changes in neuronal activity in the anterior cingulate and prefrontal regions are related to depression and that changes in brain response to treatment may also produce alterations that can be detected by recoding frontal EEG activity.

In this protocol, we proposed to identify possible neurophysiologic indicators of treatment outcome in depression, particularly indicators of brain response that appear early (within 7 days) during treatment with antidepressants. We will test whether quantitative EEG (QEEG) biomarkers can be reliably associated with response or non-response to treatment with antidepressant medications, using both monotherapy and combination drug treatments.

Comparison(s):

Selecting the best treatment for subjects with resistance to an initial antidepressant poses a considerable challenge for clinicians. The most widely prescribed antidepressants usually require 4-6 weeks of therapeutic dosing before a marked clinical improvement in symptoms is observed. Therefore, determining the optimal regimen can take several weeks or months for subjects who are resistant to the first line antidepressant. A tool for predicting eventual clinical response to antidepressants could help inform and accelerate the process of identifying the most efficacious treatment option for a given subject.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Escitalopram

No interventions assigned to this group

Bupropion XL

No interventions assigned to this group

Combination Therapy

Escitalopram and Bupropion XL

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject has diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject is suffering from cognitive, bipolar, or psychotic disorder
* Subject has had a course of ECT within the past six months
* Subject has any known contraindication for use of any of the study drugs
* Subject has a known drug dependency or substance abuse within the past six mon ths
* Subject is currently pregnant or not using a medically acceptable means of birth control
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic - MITG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew F Leuchter, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, Los Angeles-Westwood

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, Los Angeles-Westwood

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of California, San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

University of California, Los Angeles-Harbor

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Texas, Southwestern

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor University College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

R/D Clinical Research, Inc.

Lake Jackson, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Marangell LB, Gilmer WS, Burgoyne KS, Howland RH, Trivedi MH, Zisook S, Jain R, McCracken JT, Fava M, Iosifescu D, Greenwald S. Comparative effectiveness of biomarkers and clinical indicators for predicting outcomes of SSRI treatment in Major Depressive Disorder: results of the BRITE-MD study. Psychiatry Res. 2009 Sep 30;169(2):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19712979 (View on PubMed)

Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Gilmer WS, Marangell LB, Burgoyne KS, Howland RH, Trivedi MH, Zisook S, Jain R, Fava M, Iosifescu D, Greenwald S. Effectiveness of a quantitative electroencephalographic biomarker for predicting differential response or remission with escitalopram and bupropion in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2009 Sep 30;169(2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Aug 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19709754 (View on PubMed)

Cook IA, Hunter AM, Gilmer WS, Iosifescu DV, Zisook S, Burgoyne KS, Howland RH, Trivedi MH, Jain R, Greenwald S, Leuchter AF. Quantitative electroencephalogram biomarkers for predicting likelihood and speed of achieving sustained remission in major depression: a report from the biomarkers for rapid identification of treatment effectiveness in major depression (BRITE-MD) trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;74(1):51-6. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06813.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23419226 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

227

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.