Trial Outcomes & Findings for Self-Management of Osteoarthritis (NCT NCT00288912)
NCT ID: NCT00288912
Last Updated: 2015-04-24
Results Overview
Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales-2 (AIMS2), which consists of five items assessing typical pain, pain severity, and pain during specific times of the day, using a 5-point Likert scale ("all days" to "no days"). The possible range of scores is 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.
COMPLETED
NA
523 participants
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
2015-04-24
Participant Flow
Recruitment began on Oct 3, 2006 and ended on June 30, 2008. We used VA medical records to identify patients with hip and knee OA and no exclusionary diagnoses. We mailed introductory letters to these individuals and followed up with a screening phone call. Eligible patients were asked to come to the Durham VA for a baseline visit.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1
Health Education Intervention
Health Education: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about common health conditions and screening. Also includes written educational materials on these topics.
|
Arm 2
Usual Medical Care
|
Arm 3
Osteoarthritis Self-Management
Osteoarthritis Self-Management: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about topics related to self-care for osteoarthritis. Also includes written educational materials on these topics. Participants set goals and action plans, with assistance from health educator, about managing their osteoarthritis.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
175
|
174
|
174
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
158
|
157
|
146
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
17
|
17
|
28
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1
Health Education Intervention
Health Education: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about common health conditions and screening. Also includes written educational materials on these topics.
|
Arm 2
Usual Medical Care
|
Arm 3
Osteoarthritis Self-Management
Osteoarthritis Self-Management: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about topics related to self-care for osteoarthritis. Also includes written educational materials on these topics. Participants set goals and action plans, with assistance from health educator, about managing their osteoarthritis.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Developed exclusion criterion
|
4
|
6
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
9
|
6
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
5
|
12
|
Baseline Characteristics
Self-Management of Osteoarthritis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1
n=172 Participants
Health Education Intervention
Health Education: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about common health conditions and screening. Also includes written educational materials on these topics.
|
Arm 2
n=171 Participants
Usual Medical Care
|
Arm 3
n=172 Participants
Osteoarthritis Self-Management
Osteoarthritis Self-Management: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about topics related to self-care for osteoarthritis. Also includes written educational materials on these topics. Participants set goals and action plans, with assistance from health educator, about managing their osteoarthritis.
|
Total
n=515 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=5 Participants
|
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=7 Participants
|
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=5 Participants
|
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
160 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
161 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
157 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
478 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
91 participants
n=5 Participants
|
92 participants
n=7 Participants
|
95 participants
n=5 Participants
|
278 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-White
|
81 participants
n=5 Participants
|
79 participants
n=7 Participants
|
77 participants
n=5 Participants
|
237 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
172 participants
n=5 Participants
|
171 participants
n=7 Participants
|
172 participants
n=5 Participants
|
515 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12-month follow-upArthritis Impact Measurement Scales-2 (AIMS2), which consists of five items assessing typical pain, pain severity, and pain during specific times of the day, using a 5-point Likert scale ("all days" to "no days"). The possible range of scores is 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1
n=172 Participants
Health Education Intervention
Health Education: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about common health conditions and screening. Also includes written educational materials on these topics.
|
Arm 2
n=171 Participants
Usual Medical Care
|
Arm 3
n=172 Participants
Osteoarthritis Self-Management
Osteoarthritis Self-Management: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about topics related to self-care for osteoarthritis. Also includes written educational materials on these topics. Participants set goals and action plans, with assistance from health educator, about managing their osteoarthritis.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pain
Baseline
|
6.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
5.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.14
|
5.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
|
Pain
12-Month Follow-Up
|
5.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.32
|
5.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.03
|
5.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12-month follow-upThe AIMS2 physical function subscale includes 28 items that measure aspects of mobility, walking and bending, hand and finger function, arm function, self-care, and household tasks. All items on the AIMS2 physical function subscale are measured on a 5-point Likert scale ("all days" to "no days"). Scores can range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1
n=172 Participants
Health Education Intervention
Health Education: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about common health conditions and screening. Also includes written educational materials on these topics.
|
Arm 2
n=171 Participants
Usual Medical Care
|
Arm 3
n=172 Participants
Osteoarthritis Self-Management
Osteoarthritis Self-Management: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about topics related to self-care for osteoarthritis. Also includes written educational materials on these topics. Participants set goals and action plans, with assistance from health educator, about managing their osteoarthritis.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIMS 2 Physical Function
12-Month Follow-Up
|
2.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.94
|
2.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
2.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
|
AIMS 2 Physical Function
Baseline
|
2.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
2.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 monthsThe AIMS2 affect subscale includes ten items that encompass mood and tension. All items on the AIMS2 affect subscale are measured on a 5-point Likert scale ("all days" to "no days"). Scores can range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse affect.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1
n=172 Participants
Health Education Intervention
Health Education: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about common health conditions and screening. Also includes written educational materials on these topics.
|
Arm 2
n=171 Participants
Usual Medical Care
|
Arm 3
n=172 Participants
Osteoarthritis Self-Management
Osteoarthritis Self-Management: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about topics related to self-care for osteoarthritis. Also includes written educational materials on these topics. Participants set goals and action plans, with assistance from health educator, about managing their osteoarthritis.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIMS 2 Affect
Baseline
|
3.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
3.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.04
|
3.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
|
|
AIMS 2 Affect
12-Month Follow-Up
|
3.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
3.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
3.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 monthsThe Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale measures how certain patients are they can perform 8 specific activities or tasks, related to arthritis. Items are scored on a Likert Scale (1=very uncertain to 10=very certain), with total scores ranging from 1-10. Higher scores indicate greater arthritis self-efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1
n=172 Participants
Health Education Intervention
Health Education: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about common health conditions and screening. Also includes written educational materials on these topics.
|
Arm 2
n=171 Participants
Usual Medical Care
|
Arm 3
n=172 Participants
Osteoarthritis Self-Management
Osteoarthritis Self-Management: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about topics related to self-care for osteoarthritis. Also includes written educational materials on these topics. Participants set goals and action plans, with assistance from health educator, about managing their osteoarthritis.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Arthritis Self Efficacy
Baseline
|
5.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.01
|
5.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.92
|
5.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
|
Arthritis Self Efficacy
12-Month Follow-Up
|
5.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
5.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.96
|
6.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1
n=175 participants at risk
Health Education Intervention
Health Education: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about common health conditions and screening. Also includes written educational materials on these topics.
|
Arm 2
n=174 participants at risk
Usual Medical Care
|
Arm 3
n=174 participants at risk
Osteoarthritis Self-Management
Osteoarthritis Self-Management: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about topics related to self-care for osteoarthritis. Also includes written educational materials on these topics. Participants set goals and action plans, with assistance from health educator, about managing their osteoarthritis.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hospital Admission
|
1.1%
2/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
1.7%
3/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
4.0%
7/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hospital Admission
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hospital Admission
|
0.00%
0/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
General disorders
Hospital Admission
|
0.00%
0/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Inpatient Surgery
|
2.3%
4/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
3.4%
6/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
4.0%
7/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Significant Disability
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hospital Admission
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hospital Admission
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hospital Admission
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hospital Admission
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Significant Disability
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hospital Admission
|
0.00%
0/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1
n=175 participants at risk
Health Education Intervention
Health Education: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about common health conditions and screening. Also includes written educational materials on these topics.
|
Arm 2
n=174 participants at risk
Usual Medical Care
|
Arm 3
n=174 participants at risk
Osteoarthritis Self-Management
Osteoarthritis Self-Management: 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls about topics related to self-care for osteoarthritis. Also includes written educational materials on these topics. Participants set goals and action plans, with assistance from health educator, about managing their osteoarthritis.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
1.1%
2/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
3.4%
6/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
11.4%
20/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
4.0%
7/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
10.9%
19/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
2.9%
5/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
4.0%
7/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
General disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
6.3%
11/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
6.3%
11/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
7.5%
13/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
0.00%
0/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
1.1%
2/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
0.00%
0/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Outpatient Surgery
|
5.7%
10/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
5.7%
10/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
8.0%
14/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
1.1%
2/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Eye disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
1.1%
2/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.57%
1/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Emergency Room Visit
|
0.57%
1/175
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
0.00%
0/174
We have entered adverse events in relatively broad categories (e.g., Hospital Admission, Emergency Room Visit) because this was what was collected in order to meet reporting requirements of the IRB. More specific adverse event data was not required or collected, and none of the adverse events were study related.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place