A Phase II Evaluation of Docetaxel and Carboplatin Followed by Tumor Volume Directed Pelvic Irradiation
NCT ID: NCT00285415
Last Updated: 2021-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-04-30
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Paclitaxel and Intraperitoneal Carboplatin Followed by Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage IIIC-IV Uterine Cancer
NCT02112552
Carboplatin, Docetaxel, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage III/IV, or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
NCT00258362
Radiation Therapy, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With High-Risk Endometrial Cancer
NCT01041027
Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Persistent or Recurrent Stage III or Stage IV Uterine Cancer
NCT00112489
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With or Without Cisplatin and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I, Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IVA Endometrial Cancer
NCT00942357
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) explored the use of chemotherapy in protocol #107 comparing adriamycin with a combination of adriamycin and cisplatin. This trial boasted a 45% response rate for the combination arm compared to a 27% response rate in the adriamycin only arm. Although no difference was seen in overall survival, the combination arm showed an improvement in progression free survival from 3.8 to 5.7 months. Subsequently, GOG protocol #122 randomized patients to this chemotherapeutic regimen versus whole abdominal radiation therapy. This trial is now closed to accrual and results are pending.
Ball et. al. reported on a phase II trial of paclitaxel in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer done through the GOG.(3) At 250 mg/m2 (200mg/m2 for patients with previous radiation therapy) over 24 hours, every 21 days, 10/28 patients responded. There were 4 complete responders and 6 partial responders with an overall response rate of 35.7%. Toxicity was remarkably high with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and neurotoxicity seen in 62% and 10.7%, respectively.
Dimpoulos et. al. reported the use of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours and cisplatin 75mg/m2 every 21 days in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.(4) A 67% objective response rate was seen with 29% showing a complete response and 38% partial response. Toxicities included a 9% grade 3 and 4 peripheral neuropathy rate. These response rates changed the standard of care in the community setting from the more toxic regimen of adriamycin and cisplatin to paclitaxel and carboplatin.
Hoskins et. al. substituted carboplatin for cisplatin in an effort to reduce the peripheral neuropathy seen in the Dimpoulos trial. This phase II combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin with radiation therapy in advanced endometrial cancer resulted in a 75% response rate. The median failure-free survival time was 23 months, with a 62% 3-year overall survival rate. Toxicities were primarily hematologic and reversible.
The ongoing GOG protocol, #184, is exploring the combination of tumor directed radiation followed by a randomization to adriamycin and cisplatin versus adriamycin, cisplatin and paclitaxel with G-CSF support. Increased toxicity will be expected in the three-drug regimen. With a significant response rates to a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin along with radiation therapy in the phase II setting it is hard to justify the added toxicity of this three-drug regimen.
The SCOTROC phase III trial comparing docetaxel (75 mg/m2) over 1 hour plus carboplatin (AUC 6) vs. paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) over 3 hours plus carboplatin (AUC 6) yielded equivalent overall response rates in 1,077 patients with ovarian cancer. The docetaxel arm resulted in significantly less overall grade 2 and 3 sensory and motor neurotoxicity. Only 4 patients withdrew from the trial due to neurotoxicity on the docetaxel arm vs. 32 patients on the paclitaxel arm. However, the docetaxel arm resulted in a higher incidence of neutropenia and associated complications without compromising treatment delivery of overall safety.
Based on the information to date, it seems prudent to explore a phase II trial of docetaxel plus carboplatin every 3 weeks for 6 cycles followed by radiation therapy in the management of patients with advanced endometrial cancer. The proposed protocol design requires that chemotherapy be administered prior to radiation therapy in order to control distant metastatic disease before attempting to control for local-regional recurrences with radiation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Doc and Car
Receiving Doc and Car
Docetaxel and Carboplatin
docetaxel (75 mg/m2) + carboplatin (AUC 6) IV every 3 weeks X 6 cycles
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Docetaxel and Carboplatin
docetaxel (75 mg/m2) + carboplatin (AUC 6) IV every 3 weeks X 6 cycles
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Surgical stage III and limited stage IV disease, including those patients with positive adnexa, tumor invading the serosa, positive and/or para-aortic nodes, pelvic metastases, positive pelvic washings or vaginal involvement.
* Histology must be adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous cell, squamous cell, clear cell or serous papillary carcinoma
* Status post surgical resection, including a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy within the past
* 6 weeks (Pelvic lymph node and para-aortic lymph node sampling are optional)
* Patients may be sub-optimally or optimally debulked (disease \< 2 cm). Patients are eligible with measurable disease or evaluable
* disease. All positive para-aortic node patients must be further staged by chest CT scan. If chest CT scan is negative, patients are eligible.
* Patients who have met the pre-entry criteria including following lab findings:
* ANC \> 1500, Platelet count \> 100,000/mm3, Hemoglobin ≥ 8 mg/dl, Creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dl.
* Total Bilirubin must be within normal limits. (WNL)
* AST or ALT and Alkaline Phosphatase must be within the range allowing for eligibility
* Patients who have signed an approved informed consent.
* GOG Performance Grade 0, 1, or 2.
* Women ≥ 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have had prior pelvic or abdominal radiation therapy.
* Patients with concomitant malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer.
* Patient with a prior malignancy who have been disease-free for \< 5 years or who received prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy for that malignancy.
* Patients with a history of serious co-morbid illness that would preclude protocol therapy.
* Patients with an estimated survival of less than three months.
* Patients with parenchymal liver metastases.
* Patients who received prior chemotherapy excluding low-dose methotrexate for rheumatologic reasons.
* Histology consistent with uterine sarcomas, carcinosarcoma or leiomyosarcoma.
* Women with baseline peripheral neuropathy Grade ≥ 2.
* Women with a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction to drugs formulated with polysorbate 80.
18 Years
99 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sanofi
INDUSTRY
Carilion Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dennis R Scribner, JR, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gynecologic Oncology Research & Development, LLC
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Carilion GYN Oncology Associates
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
WIRB PRO NUM: 20050247
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EndoRT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.