Trial Outcomes & Findings for Montelukast Asthmatic Smoker Study (0476-332)(COMPLETED) (NCT NCT00284856)
NCT ID: NCT00284856
Last Updated: 2024-05-10
Results Overview
An asthma-control day, computed from daily diaries, was any day with no unscheduled visit for asthma care, no use of \> than 2 puffs of β-agonist, no use of other asthma rescue medication, and no nocturnal awakening. The percentage of asthma-control days was the number of days with asthma-control divided by the total number of days with non-missing values for this endpoint. The patient diary had questions concerning daytime and nighttime symptoms, morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), β-agonist use, asthma attacks and smoking activity.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1640 participants
6 months
2024-05-10
Participant Flow
Of the 1640 participants enrolled in the study, 621 participants were excluded during screening and not randomized. The remaining 1019 participants were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Montelukast
Montelukast 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
Fluticasone
Fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily and Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime for 6 months
|
Placebo
Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
347
|
336
|
336
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
296
|
286
|
276
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
51
|
50
|
60
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Montelukast
Montelukast 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
Fluticasone
Fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily and Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime for 6 months
|
Placebo
Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
2
|
1
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
25
|
21
|
22
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
12
|
16
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Montelukast Asthmatic Smoker Study (0476-332)(COMPLETED)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Montelukast
n=347 Participants
Montelukast 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
Fluticasone
n=336 Participants
Fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily and Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime for 6 months
|
Placebo
n=336 Participants
Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
Total
n=1019 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=5 Participants
|
38.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=7 Participants
|
37.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
|
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
163 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
147 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
166 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
476 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
184 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
189 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
543 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Efficacy analysis was based on the full analysis set (FAS) population which included all participants who had at least 7 days of on-treatment data for the specific endpoint. Thirty three patients were excluded from the FAS (13 on montelukast, 7 on fluticasone and 13 on placebo). One participant in the placebo group did not take study medication.
An asthma-control day, computed from daily diaries, was any day with no unscheduled visit for asthma care, no use of \> than 2 puffs of β-agonist, no use of other asthma rescue medication, and no nocturnal awakening. The percentage of asthma-control days was the number of days with asthma-control divided by the total number of days with non-missing values for this endpoint. The patient diary had questions concerning daytime and nighttime symptoms, morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), β-agonist use, asthma attacks and smoking activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Montelukast
n=334 Participants
Montelukast 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
Fluticasone
n=329 Participants
Fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily and Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime for 6 months
|
Placebo
n=323 Participants
Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Asthma-control Days Over the 6-month Treatment Period
|
50.70 Percentage of days
Standard Deviation 38.19 • Interval 40.62 to 49.33
|
53.30 Percentage of days
Standard Deviation 39.06 • Interval 44.86 to 53.53
|
43.84 Percentage of days
Standard Deviation 38.08 • Interval 34.65 to 43.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Efficacy analysis was based on the full analysis set (FAS) population which included all participants who received at least one dose of the randomized double-blind study medication and who had at least 7 days of on-treatment data for the specific endpoint.
4 daytime symptoms were evaluated daily on a 7-point scale from 0 (best)- 6 (worst). The on-treatment daytime symptom score was computed by averaging over Period II the mean of the 4 daily symptom scores recorded daily in the diary while the baseline daytime symptom score was obtained by averaging the mean of the 4 daily symptom scores across the daily diary entries of the Baseline period (Period I). The change from baseline in mean daytime symptom score is computed as the difference between the mean on-treatment daytime symptom score \& the mean baseline daytime symptom score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Montelukast
n=335 Participants
Montelukast 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
Fluticasone
n=329 Participants
Fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily and Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime for 6 months
|
Placebo
n=322 Participants
Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime Symptom Score Over a 6-month Treatment Period
Baseline
|
1.82 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03 • Interval -0.53 to -0.37
|
1.78 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97 • Interval -0.58 to -0.42
|
1.90 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94 • Interval -0.38 to -0.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime Symptom Score Over a 6-month Treatment Period
Average Change from Baseline During Period II
|
-0.41 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
-0.44 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
-0.27 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 monthsPopulation: Efficacy analysis was based on the full analysis set (FAS) population which included all participants who received at least one dose of the randomized double-blind study medication and who had at least 7 days of on-treatment data for the specific endpoint.
PEFR measurements were performed daily, in the morning before using any medication. The on-treatment AM PEFR was computed by averaging over Period II (treatment period) the AM PEFR recorded daily in the diary, while the baseline AM PEFR was obtained by averaging the AM PEFR across the daily diary entries of the Baseline Period or Period I (placebo run-in period). The change from baseline in average AM PEFR is computed as the difference between mean on-treatment AM PEFR and mean baseline AM PEFR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Montelukast
n=334 Participants
Montelukast 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
Fluticasone
n=329 Participants
Fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily and Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime for 6 months
|
Placebo
n=324 Participants
Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Morning (AM) PEFR (Peak Expiratory Flow Rate) Over a 6-month Treatment Period
Baseline
|
363.75 Liters/minute
Standard Deviation 112.40
|
354.28 Liters/minute
Standard Deviation 101.64
|
347.98 Liters/minute
Standard Deviation 99.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Morning (AM) PEFR (Peak Expiratory Flow Rate) Over a 6-month Treatment Period
Average Change from Baseline During Period II
|
12.84 Liters/minute
Standard Deviation 40.22
|
19.31 Liters/minute
Standard Deviation 44.85
|
8.27 Liters/minute
Standard Deviation 40.70
|
Adverse Events
Montelukast
Fluticasone
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Montelukast
n=347 participants at risk
Montelukast 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
Fluticasone
n=336 participants at risk
Fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily and Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime for 6 months
|
Placebo
n=335 participants at risk
Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/336 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Dermoid cyst
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/336 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/335 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Autoimmune hepatitis
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/336 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/335 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Endometritis
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/335 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salpingo-oophoritis
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.60%
2/336 • Number of events 2
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
1.8%
6/335 • Number of events 7
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Brain herniation
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/336 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intentional overdose
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/335 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/336 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/335 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bursitis
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/336 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Facial palsy
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/336
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.29%
1/347 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.60%
2/336 • Number of events 5
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.60%
2/335 • Number of events 3
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthmatic crisis
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/336 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Abortion induced
|
0.00%
0/347
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.30%
1/336 • Number of events 1
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/335
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Montelukast
n=347 participants at risk
Montelukast 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
Fluticasone
n=336 participants at risk
Fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily and Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime for 6 months
|
Placebo
n=335 participants at risk
Montelukast matching placebo 10 mg tablet once daily at bedtime and Fluticasone propionate matching placebo 250 mcg twice daily for 6 months
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.6%
23/347 • Number of events 30
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
8.0%
27/336 • Number of events 34
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
6.6%
22/335 • Number of events 26
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
13.0%
45/347 • Number of events 71
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
10.1%
34/336 • Number of events 50
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
17.0%
57/335 • Number of events 95
The population for safety analyses was the All Patients as Treated (APaT) set. The set included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of the double-blind study medication. One participant in the placebo group was randomized but did not take treatment. Therefore, participant was not included in the safety analyses.
|
Additional Information
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The SPONSOR must have the opportunity to review all proposed abstracts, manuscripts, or presentations regarding this study 60 days prior to submission for publication/presentation. Any information identified by the SPONSOR as confidential must be deleted prior to submission. SPONSOR review can be expedited to meet publication guidelines.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER