Trial Outcomes & Findings for Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High Risk Uterine Leiomyosarcoma (NCT NCT00282087)
NCT ID: NCT00282087
Last Updated: 2014-12-01
Results Overview
COMPLETED
PHASE2
47 participants
Every 3 months up to two years
2014-12-01
Participant Flow
This was multi-center study open at 11 major medical centers across the United States.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
Gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 intravenously over 90 minutes, followed by Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 8 intravenously over 1 hour.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
Gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 intravenously over 90 minutes, followed by Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 8 intravenously over 1 hour.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High Risk Uterine Leiomyosarcoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=47 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
47 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 3 months up to two yearsOutcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=46 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Two-year Progression-free Survival Among Women Treated With This Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
|
78 percentage of participants
Interval 67.0 to 91.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every 28 days during dosing and then every 3 months thereafter until patient comes off studyUnacceptable toxicity is defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity events that are considered to be treatment-related, excluding alopecia and fatigue.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=46 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Tolerability/Toxicity of This Regimen
|
6 number of major toxicity events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsOutcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=47 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Age and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
|
53 years
Interval 37.0 to 70.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsOutcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=47 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Menopausal Status at Diagnosis and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
Postmenopausal
|
43 participants
|
|
Correlation Between Menopausal Status at Diagnosis and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
Premenopausal
|
4 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsAJCC Stage I: No serosal involvement AJCC Stage II: No serosal involement AJCC Stage III: Serosal only
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=47 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Uterine Serosal Involvement and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
AJCC Stage I
|
0 participants
|
|
Correlation Between Uterine Serosal Involvement and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
AJCC Stage II
|
6 participants
|
|
Correlation Between Uterine Serosal Involvement and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
AJCC Stage III
|
41 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsMitotic rate is measured in mitoses per 10 high-power fields
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=47 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Mitotic Rate and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
|
18 mitoses per 10 high-power fields
Interval 5.0 to 83.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Only 38 of the 47 patients were evaluable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=38 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Estrogen Receptor (ER) Status and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
Positive Status
|
24 participants
|
|
Correlation Between Estrogen Receptor (ER) Status and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
Negative Status
|
14 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Only 38 of the 47 patients were evaluable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=38 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Progesterone Receptor (PR) Status and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
Positive Status
|
19 participants
|
|
Correlation Between Progesterone Receptor (PR) Status and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
Negative Status
|
19 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsStage I: confined to the uterine corpus Stage II: confined to corpus and cervix Stage IIIA: serosa involvement only (disease could involve the uterine serosa, but patients must have had no other evidence of local spread)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=47 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between 1988 FIGO Stage and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
FIFO Stage I
|
38 participants
|
|
Correlation Between 1988 FIGO Stage and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
FIGO Stage II
|
7 participants
|
|
Correlation Between 1988 FIGO Stage and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
FIGO Stage III
|
2 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsOutcome measures
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=47 Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Estrogen Receptor (ER) or Progesterone Receptor (PR) Positive and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
ER or PR Positive
|
33 participants
|
|
Correlation Between Estrogen Receptor (ER) or Progesterone Receptor (PR) Positive and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)
ER and PR Negative
|
14 participants
|
Adverse Events
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=47 participants at risk
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Perforation of bowel
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hernia
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colostomy Reversal
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Chest Pain
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophils
|
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat Pain
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Investigations
Bilirubin
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Investigations
Platelets
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood clot
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Renal insufficiency
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cellulitis
|
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Women Treated With Adjuvant Regimen for High Risk Uterine LMS
n=47 participants at risk
|
|---|---|
|
Endocrine disorders
myelosuppression
|
29.8%
14/47
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
21.3%
10/47
|
|
Nervous system disorders
neuropathy
|
6.4%
3/47
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Edema
|
4.3%
2/47
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place