New Tablet Formulation and Dosing Regimen of Balsalazide Disodium in Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis
NCT ID: NCT00269438
Last Updated: 2019-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
225 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-12-31
2007-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Balsalazide Disodium vs. Mesalamine in Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis
NCT00408174
Open-Label, Long-term Balsalziade Disodium Tablet Ulcerative Colitis Study
NCT00486031
Basiliximab in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
NCT00430898
Combination Corticosteroids+5-aminosalicylic Acids Compared to Corticosteroids Alone (for Ulcerative Colitis).
NCT02665845
Mesalamine Pellet Formulation to Maintain Remission of Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis
NCT00744016
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The secondary endpoints are as follows:
1. The change from baseline over the duration of treatment in total MMDAI score and in the individual MMDAI subscales.
2. The change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
3. The proportion of subjects with treatment failure, defined as withdrawal due to significant disease progression or lack of significant improvement, as determined by the Investigator.
4. The proportion of subjects with mucosal healing at Weeks 2 and 8, where mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy score of 0 or 1
5. The proportion of subjects achieving complete remission at Week 2 and Week 8, where complete remission is defined as a MMDAI score of less than or equal to 1.
6. The proportion of subjects with improvement from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
7. Change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and subjective sense of well being, as recorded in the subjects' diaries.
8. The proportion of subjects achieving clinical remission at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8, where clinical remission is defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and a combined score of less than or equal to 2 for bowel frequency and physician assessment using the MMDAI.
9. Time to clinical remission, where clinical remission is defined as in secondary endpoint number eight.
Safety endpoints are as follows:
* incidence of treatment-emergent AEs grouped by body system and evaluated by treatment group;
* changes from baseline in clinical laboratory parameters at each treatment visit by treatment group; and
* changes from baseline in vital sign measurements at each treatment visit by treatment group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
5 ASA, enemas, suppositories, corticosteroids
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent is signed and dated prior to any study-related activities.
2. Subject is a male or, if the subject is female, she is eligible to enter if she is of:
Non-childbearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who has undergone sterilization \[hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation\] or is post-menopausal. For purposes of this study, postmenopausal is defined as 1 year without menses);
OR,
Childbearing potential, has a negative serum pregnancy test at screen and, if heterosexually active, agrees to one of the following:
* Double barrier method of contraception, specifically, use of a condom and spermicide, for 1 week prior to study drug administration, throughout the 8 week Treatment Phase.
* Oral contraceptives administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration during all 6 months of study drug administration and administered for 1 monthly cycle following completion of the study.
* An intrauterine device (IUD), inserted by a qualified clinician, with published data showing that the lowest expected failure rate is less than or equal to 1% per year (not all IUDs meet this criterion).
* Medroxyprogesterone acetate (DEPO-PROVERA) administered for a minimum of 1 monthly cycle prior to the study drug administration, during all 6 months of study drug administration, and administered for 1 monthly cycle following study completion. Norelgestromin/ ethinyl estradiol transdermal system (Ortho Evra patch) administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration and administered for 2 monthly cycles following study completion
* Partner has undergone vasectomy and subject is in a monogamous relationship. The investigator is responsible for determining whether the subject is using appropriate birth control for study participation.
* Subject is greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
* Subjects with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis experiencing symptoms of an acute flare within the past 4 weeks.
3. Subject has not taken more than 2.4 grams of mesalamine or equivalent for a continuous period of 4 weeks preceding the screening visit
4. Subjects must have a baseline Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) score between 6 and 10, inclusive. Additionally, subjects must score greater than or equal to 2 on Bleeding and greater than or equal to 2 on Endoscopy/Sigmoidoscopy.
5. Subject is capable and willing to comply with all study procedures.
6. Disease extends at least 20 cm from the rectum on screening sigmoidoscopy.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject has a history of allergy or intolerance to aspirin, mesalamine, or other salicylates.
3. Subject has recently (within the past 30 days) failed therapy with balsalazide disodium
4. Subject has received immunosuppressive therapy (e.g. azothioprine, 6 mercaptopurine) within 30 days, or corticosteroids (oral, intravenous \[IV\] or topical rectal) within 30 days prior to screening.
5. Subject has received intra-rectal aminosalicylates within 14 days of screening.
6. Subject has had any prior bowel surgery, excepting appendectomy.
7. Subject has participated in an investigational drug or device study within the 30 days prior to study screening, with the exception of Salix protocols 3003 \& 3004 entitled: "A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial to evaluate the use of mesalamine pellet formulation 1.5G QD to maintain remission from mildly to moderate ulcerative colitis."
8. Subject is pregnant or at risk of pregnancy, or is lactating (female subjects only).
9. Subject shows evidence of current excessive alcohol consumption or drug dependence.
10. Subject has a history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis (B and C).
11. Subject has other infectious, ischemic, or immunologic diseases with GI involvement.
12. Subject has twice the upper limit of normal (ULN) for any of the following LFTs: alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT), alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin (except isolated elevation of unconjugated bilirubin).
13. Subject has uncontrolled, clinically significant renal disease manifested by 1.5 × ULN of serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels.
14. Subject has calculated creatinine clearance level of less than or equal to 60 mL/min.
15. Subject has unstable cardiovascular, coagulopathy or pulmonary disease.
16. Subject has active malignancy within the last 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin, or if female, in situ cervical carcinoma that has been surgically excised.
17. Subject has any condition or circumstance that would, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent completion of the study or interfere with analysis of study results, including history of noncompliance with treatments or visits.
18. Subject has sclerosing cholangitis.
19. Subject has positive stool culture for ovum and parasites (O and P) or C. difficile.
20. Subject has been treated with infliximab, cyclosporine, natalizumab, or methotrexate for ulcerative colitis within the last 30 days prior to screening.
21. Regular use of NSAIDS except cardioprotective ASA (i.e., less than or equal to 162 mg ASA per day).
22. Subject has received cell-depleting therapies such as the Adacolumn.
23. Subject requires antidiarrheal therapy during screening.
24. Subject has clinical or radiographic findings suggestive of serious UC complications such as toxic megacolon or colonic perforation.
Females of Reproductive Potential:
If a female subject becomes pregnant while on this study, the study drug will be discontinued immediately and the subject followed until the outcome of the pregnancy is known. If a pregnancy occurs, it will be reported in the same manner as an unexpected AE using the guidelines provided in Section 6.4.1.9.
Premature Subject Discontinuation:
A subject may be discontinued from the study for the following medical or administrative reasons:
* Occurrence of an AE, which in the judgment of the investigator suggests an unacceptable risk to the subject (The investigator will follow the subject until satisfactory resolution of the AE or the AE is determined to be stable);
* Development on-study of any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator or the study sponsor, places the subject at an unacceptable medical risk if he/she continues;
* Pregnancy;
* Subject request;
* Institution of additional medical (rescue) therapy for UC. The investigator may discontinue individual subjects from the study at any time. Subjects will be encouraged to complete the study; however they may voluntarily withdraw at any time. The investigator must provide written documentation of the reason for discontinuation on the CRF. Regardless of the reason for withdrawal, all subjects will be asked to undergo an end of therapy evaluation. Every attempt will be made to obtain all the end of study assessments, including all of the subscales of the MMDAI (i.e., bowel frequency, bleeding, physician's assessment, and endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy score).
Subjects who withdraw or are withdrawn will not be replaced under this protocol.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Birmingham Gastroenterology Associates
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Spring Memorial Hospital
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Little Rock Diagnostic Clinic
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Advanced Clinical Research Institute
Anaheim, California, United States
Lovelace Scientific Resources
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Digestive Liver Disease Specialists, Medical Group
Garden Grove, California, United States
Therapeutic Research Institute of Orange County
Laguna Hills, California, United States
Long Beach VA Medical Center
Long Beach, California, United States
Facey Medical Group
Mission Hills, California, United States
Community Clinical Trials
Orange, California, United States
Rider Research Group
San Francisco, California, United States
John Jolley, M.D.
San Rafael, California, United States
Lovelace Scientific Resources
Santa Ana, California, United States
Santa Barbara Clinical Research
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Connecticut Gastroenterology Institute
Bristol, Connecticut, United States
Stamford Therapeutic Consortium
Stamford, Connecticut, United States
Medical Research Unlimited
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Mark Lamet, M.D.
Hollywood, Florida, United States
Southern Clinical Research Consultants
Hollywood, Florida, United States
United Medical Research
New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States
Venture Research Institute, LLC
North Miami Beach, Florida, United States
Advanced Gastroenterology Associates
Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
Lovelace Scientific Resources
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Advent Clinical Research
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Clinical Research of Tampa Bay, Inc.
Spring Hill, Florida, United States
Metabolic Research Institute, Inc.
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Gary Richter, M.D.
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
The Atlanta Center for Gastroenterology
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia
Macon, Georgia, United States
Northwest Gastroenterologists S.C.
Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States
University Digestive Health Center
Oak Forest, Illinois, United States
Covenent Clinic
Waterloo, Iowa, United States
Digestive Health Center
Topeka, Kansas, United States
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Digestive Health Center of Louisiana
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Woodholme Gastroenterology Associates, PA
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Sinai Medical Office Building
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Mid Atlantic Medical Research Centers
Hollywood, Maryland, United States
Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC
Chesterfield, Michigan, United States
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Center for Digestive & Liver Diseases
Mexico, Missouri, United States
St. Louis Center for Clinical Research
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Central Jersey Primary Care Inc.
Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States
Ocean City, New Jersey, United States
New York, New York, United States
VA Medical Center
Syracuse, New York, United States
Upstate Gastroenterology Associates, PC
Troy, New York, United States
LeBauer Research Associates, PA
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Bethany Medical Center
High Point, North Carolina, United States
Boice-Willis Clinic
Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States
Consultants for Clinical Research, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Avamar Center for Gastroenterology, Inc.
Warren, Ohio, United States
Charleston Gastroenterology Specialists, LLC
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Hillcrest Clinical Research LLC
Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States
Gastroenterology Associates
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Gastrointestinal Associates
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Memphis Gastroenterology Group
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Nashville Medical Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Clinical Trial Network
Houston, Texas, United States
NationsMed Clinical Research
Houston, Texas, United States
Houston Digestive Disease Clinic
Houston, Texas, United States
Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater
Chesapeake, Virginia, United States
Seattle Gastroenterology Associates
Seattle, Washington, United States
Eastern Washington Clinical Research Center
Spokane, Washington, United States
Spokane Digestive Disease Center Research
Spokane, Washington, United States
Tacoma Digestive Disease Research Center
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BZUC3002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.