New Tablet Formulation and Dosing Regimen of Balsalazide Disodium in Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis

NCT ID: NCT00269438

Last Updated: 2019-11-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

225 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-12-31

Study Completion Date

2007-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy and safety of a new tablet formulation and dosing regimen of balsalazide disodium dosed twice daily in achieving clinical improvement in subjects with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis after 8 weeks of therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of subjects that achieve clinical improvement and improvement in the rectal bleeding subscale of the MMDAI at the end of eight weeks of therapy, where clinical improvement is defined as a greater than or equal to 3 point improvement from baseline in the MMDAI.

The secondary endpoints are as follows:

1. The change from baseline over the duration of treatment in total MMDAI score and in the individual MMDAI subscales.
2. The change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
3. The proportion of subjects with treatment failure, defined as withdrawal due to significant disease progression or lack of significant improvement, as determined by the Investigator.
4. The proportion of subjects with mucosal healing at Weeks 2 and 8, where mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy score of 0 or 1
5. The proportion of subjects achieving complete remission at Week 2 and Week 8, where complete remission is defined as a MMDAI score of less than or equal to 1.
6. The proportion of subjects with improvement from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in total MMDAI score and in each individual MMDAI subscale (endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy at Weeks 2 and 8 only).
7. Change from baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 in diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and subjective sense of well being, as recorded in the subjects' diaries.
8. The proportion of subjects achieving clinical remission at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8, where clinical remission is defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and a combined score of less than or equal to 2 for bowel frequency and physician assessment using the MMDAI.
9. Time to clinical remission, where clinical remission is defined as in secondary endpoint number eight.

Safety endpoints are as follows:

* incidence of treatment-emergent AEs grouped by body system and evaluated by treatment group;
* changes from baseline in clinical laboratory parameters at each treatment visit by treatment group; and
* changes from baseline in vital sign measurements at each treatment visit by treatment group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ulcerative Colitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

5 ASA, enemas, suppositories, corticosteroids

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply:

1. An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent is signed and dated prior to any study-related activities.
2. Subject is a male or, if the subject is female, she is eligible to enter if she is of:

Non-childbearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who has undergone sterilization \[hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation\] or is post-menopausal. For purposes of this study, postmenopausal is defined as 1 year without menses);

OR,

Childbearing potential, has a negative serum pregnancy test at screen and, if heterosexually active, agrees to one of the following:
* Double barrier method of contraception, specifically, use of a condom and spermicide, for 1 week prior to study drug administration, throughout the 8 week Treatment Phase.
* Oral contraceptives administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration during all 6 months of study drug administration and administered for 1 monthly cycle following completion of the study.
* An intrauterine device (IUD), inserted by a qualified clinician, with published data showing that the lowest expected failure rate is less than or equal to 1% per year (not all IUDs meet this criterion).
* Medroxyprogesterone acetate (DEPO-PROVERA) administered for a minimum of 1 monthly cycle prior to the study drug administration, during all 6 months of study drug administration, and administered for 1 monthly cycle following study completion. Norelgestromin/ ethinyl estradiol transdermal system (Ortho Evra patch) administered for at least 2 monthly cycles prior to study drug administration and administered for 2 monthly cycles following study completion
* Partner has undergone vasectomy and subject is in a monogamous relationship. The investigator is responsible for determining whether the subject is using appropriate birth control for study participation.
* Subject is greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
* Subjects with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis experiencing symptoms of an acute flare within the past 4 weeks.
3. Subject has not taken more than 2.4 grams of mesalamine or equivalent for a continuous period of 4 weeks preceding the screening visit
4. Subjects must have a baseline Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) score between 6 and 10, inclusive. Additionally, subjects must score greater than or equal to 2 on Bleeding and greater than or equal to 2 on Endoscopy/Sigmoidoscopy.
5. Subject is capable and willing to comply with all study procedures.
6. Disease extends at least 20 cm from the rectum on screening sigmoidoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject has a significant medical, including psychiatric, condition which in the opinion of the investigator precludes participation in the study.
2. Subject has a history of allergy or intolerance to aspirin, mesalamine, or other salicylates.
3. Subject has recently (within the past 30 days) failed therapy with balsalazide disodium
4. Subject has received immunosuppressive therapy (e.g. azothioprine, 6 mercaptopurine) within 30 days, or corticosteroids (oral, intravenous \[IV\] or topical rectal) within 30 days prior to screening.
5. Subject has received intra-rectal aminosalicylates within 14 days of screening.
6. Subject has had any prior bowel surgery, excepting appendectomy.
7. Subject has participated in an investigational drug or device study within the 30 days prior to study screening, with the exception of Salix protocols 3003 \& 3004 entitled: "A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial to evaluate the use of mesalamine pellet formulation 1.5G QD to maintain remission from mildly to moderate ulcerative colitis."
8. Subject is pregnant or at risk of pregnancy, or is lactating (female subjects only).
9. Subject shows evidence of current excessive alcohol consumption or drug dependence.
10. Subject has a history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis (B and C).
11. Subject has other infectious, ischemic, or immunologic diseases with GI involvement.
12. Subject has twice the upper limit of normal (ULN) for any of the following LFTs: alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT), alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin (except isolated elevation of unconjugated bilirubin).
13. Subject has uncontrolled, clinically significant renal disease manifested by 1.5 × ULN of serum creatinine or blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels.
14. Subject has calculated creatinine clearance level of less than or equal to 60 mL/min.
15. Subject has unstable cardiovascular, coagulopathy or pulmonary disease.
16. Subject has active malignancy within the last 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin, or if female, in situ cervical carcinoma that has been surgically excised.
17. Subject has any condition or circumstance that would, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent completion of the study or interfere with analysis of study results, including history of noncompliance with treatments or visits.
18. Subject has sclerosing cholangitis.
19. Subject has positive stool culture for ovum and parasites (O and P) or C. difficile.
20. Subject has been treated with infliximab, cyclosporine, natalizumab, or methotrexate for ulcerative colitis within the last 30 days prior to screening.
21. Regular use of NSAIDS except cardioprotective ASA (i.e., less than or equal to 162 mg ASA per day).
22. Subject has received cell-depleting therapies such as the Adacolumn.
23. Subject requires antidiarrheal therapy during screening.
24. Subject has clinical or radiographic findings suggestive of serious UC complications such as toxic megacolon or colonic perforation.

Females of Reproductive Potential:

If a female subject becomes pregnant while on this study, the study drug will be discontinued immediately and the subject followed until the outcome of the pregnancy is known. If a pregnancy occurs, it will be reported in the same manner as an unexpected AE using the guidelines provided in Section 6.4.1.9.

Premature Subject Discontinuation:

A subject may be discontinued from the study for the following medical or administrative reasons:

* Occurrence of an AE, which in the judgment of the investigator suggests an unacceptable risk to the subject (The investigator will follow the subject until satisfactory resolution of the AE or the AE is determined to be stable);
* Development on-study of any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator or the study sponsor, places the subject at an unacceptable medical risk if he/she continues;
* Pregnancy;
* Subject request;
* Institution of additional medical (rescue) therapy for UC. The investigator may discontinue individual subjects from the study at any time. Subjects will be encouraged to complete the study; however they may voluntarily withdraw at any time. The investigator must provide written documentation of the reason for discontinuation on the CRF. Regardless of the reason for withdrawal, all subjects will be asked to undergo an end of therapy evaluation. Every attempt will be made to obtain all the end of study assessments, including all of the subscales of the MMDAI (i.e., bowel frequency, bleeding, physician's assessment, and endoscopy/sigmoidoscopy score).

Subjects who withdraw or are withdrawn will not be replaced under this protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham Gastroenterology Associates

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Spring Memorial Hospital

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Little Rock Diagnostic Clinic

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Advanced Clinical Research Institute

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Lovelace Scientific Resources

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Digestive Liver Disease Specialists, Medical Group

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

Therapeutic Research Institute of Orange County

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach VA Medical Center

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Facey Medical Group

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Community Clinical Trials

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Rider Research Group

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

John Jolley, M.D.

San Rafael, California, United States

Site Status

Lovelace Scientific Resources

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Barbara Clinical Research

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Connecticut Gastroenterology Institute

Bristol, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Stamford Therapeutic Consortium

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Medical Research Unlimited

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Mark Lamet, M.D.

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Southern Clinical Research Consultants

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

United Medical Research

New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Venture Research Institute, LLC

North Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Advanced Gastroenterology Associates

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lovelace Scientific Resources

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Advent Clinical Research

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research of Tampa Bay, Inc.

Spring Hill, Florida, United States

Site Status

Metabolic Research Institute, Inc.

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gary Richter, M.D.

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

The Atlanta Center for Gastroenterology

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwest Gastroenterologists S.C.

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University Digestive Health Center

Oak Forest, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Covenent Clinic

Waterloo, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Digestive Health Center

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Digestive Health Center of Louisiana

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Woodholme Gastroenterology Associates, PA

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Sinai Medical Office Building

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Mid Atlantic Medical Research Centers

Hollywood, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Center for Digestive & Liver Diseases

Mexico, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St. Louis Center for Clinical Research

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Central Jersey Primary Care Inc.

Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Ocean City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Upstate Gastroenterology Associates, PC

Troy, New York, United States

Site Status

LeBauer Research Associates, PA

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bethany Medical Center

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Boice-Willis Clinic

Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Consultants for Clinical Research, Inc.

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Avamar Center for Gastroenterology, Inc.

Warren, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Charleston Gastroenterology Specialists, LLC

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hillcrest Clinical Research LLC

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Gastroenterology Associates

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Gastrointestinal Associates

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis Gastroenterology Group

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville Medical Research Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Network

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

NationsMed Clinical Research

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston Digestive Disease Clinic

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater

Chesapeake, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle Gastroenterology Associates

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Eastern Washington Clinical Research Center

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane Digestive Disease Center Research

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma Digestive Disease Research Center

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BZUC3002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.