Patient Based Strategy to Reduce Errors in Diabetes Care

NCT ID: NCT00262197

Last Updated: 2012-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-12-31

Study Completion Date

2005-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project evaluates a HPMG effort to reduce error rates through customized direct feedback of diabetes quality of care data to diabetes patients and their physicians. HPMG has routinely provided patients with personalized feedback of glucose and cholesterol test results since about 1997. This project will implement and evaluate the impact of this intervention on diabetes medical error rates and resource use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The project, Patient-Based Strategy to Reduce Errors in Diabetes Care (referred to as MOVES), addresses issues of overuse, under use, or misuse of care for adults with diabetes. This combination research and translation project has been developed as a component of the Pursuing Perfection initiative of HealthPartners Medical Group, with the close collaboration of HPMG leadership. HealthPartners Medical Group is widely regarded as a national leader in diabetes care, with dramatic improvements in both glucose control and cholesterol control over the past 8 years \[Graphs\].

The MOVES study is attempting to activate patients with diabetes to be more involved in their care. To help patients do this, HPMG sends patients a customized summary of their care. The summary includes a graph of recent glucose and cholesterol test results and specific suggestions that may improve care. In many cases, a visit with the patient's personal physician is encouraged to assure ongoing progress towards important evidence-based goals in diabetes care.

Physicians also receive a matched communication that indicates areas for potential improvement and makes technical suggestions for care based on the Staged Diabetes Management © protocols. The project tries to ally expert judgment with the physician's personal knowledge of a patient. It is felt that this approach is critical to assessing what the best improvement strategy may be in each individual case.

This inexpensive customized intervention has potential to be widely disseminated and can be seamlessly integrated with other interventions to further achievement of clinical goals. The results are relevant to patients, clinicians, payers, and policymakers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Diabetes mellitus Medical error rates Pharmacotherapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Customized Physician Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Customized Patient Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

In addition, participating patients met all of the following criteria: (a) age less than 75 years, (b) Charlson comorbidity score of 3 or less, (c) linked to the a primary care physician who was participating in the study in two consecutive calendar years, (d) had pharmacy coverage at the time of the intervention and for the previous 12-month period, and (e) had either HBA1c \> 7% or LDL \> 130 mg/dl (or LDL \> 100 mg/dl if the patient also had CHD).

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

HealthPartners Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Patrick J O'Connor, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

HealthPartners Institute

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sperl-Hillen JM, O'Connor PJ. Factors driving diabetes care improvement in a large medical group: ten years of progress. Am J Manag Care. 2005 Aug;11(5 Suppl):S177-85.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16111440 (View on PubMed)

O'Connor PJ, Gray RJ, Maciosek MV, Fillbrandt KM, DeFor TA, Alexander CM, Weiss TW, Teutsch SM. Cholesterol levels and statin use in patients with coronary heart disease treated in primary care settings. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Jul;2(3):A05. Epub 2005 Jun 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15963307 (View on PubMed)

Gilmer TP, O'Connor PJ, Rush WA, Crain AL, Whitebird RR, Hanson AM, Solberg LI. Predictors of health care costs in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jan;28(1):59-64. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.1.59.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15616234 (View on PubMed)

O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Johnson PE, Rush WA, Biltz G. Clinical Inertia and Outpatient Medical Errors. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 2: Concepts and Methodology). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20513/

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21249838 (View on PubMed)

O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Johnson PE, Rush WA. Identification, Classification, and Frequency of Medical Errors in Outpatient Diabetes Care. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 1: Research Findings). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20464/

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21249801 (View on PubMed)

O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen J, Johnson PE, Rush WA, Crain AL. Customized feedback to patients and providers failed to improve safety or quality of diabetes care: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1158-63. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2247. Epub 2009 Apr 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19366977 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U18HS011919

Identifier Type: AHRQ

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

0105300

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id