Aggrastat to Zocor (AtoZ) - the Use of Two Approved Drugs to Treat Patients Who Have Experienced Chest Pain or a Heart Attack (0733-180)
NCT ID: NCT00251576
Last Updated: 2024-08-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
4497 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1999-11-01
2004-03-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Z-Phase: To evaluate early treatment of patients with long term chest pain (using an approved drug for 30 days, followed by an increased dose of the drug) as compared to patients (treated with diet and 4 months placebo followed by diet and approved drug) in patients who have experienced acute chest pain or heart attack.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Comparing Ezetimibe Plus Simvastatin Versus Simvastatin Alone in Patients at Risk for Heart Disease (0653-023)(COMPLETED)
NCT00551447
Study To Assess The Efficacy Of A Cholesterol Lowering Drug On Top Of Statins In Patients After Myocardial Infarction (MI)(0653A-150)
NCT00652717
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome (0653A-107)(COMPLETED)
NCT00409773
To Evaluate Ezetimibe Plus Atorvastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients With High Cholesterol Not Controlled on Atorvastatin 20 mg (0653-079)(COMPLETED)
NCT00276458
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (10 mg/40 mg) vs. the Doubling of Atorvastatin in High Risk Participants (MK-0653A-134 AM1)(COMPLETED)
NCT00782184
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
A-Phase: tirofiban; Z-Phase simvastatin
Duration of Treatment: A-Phase: minimum suggested 48 hours, maximum suggested 108 hours. Z-Phase: 2 years
Comparator: A-Phase: low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin
Duration of Treatment: A-Phase: low molecular weight heparin, 2 to 8 days; unfractionated heparin, minium suggested 48 hours, maximum 108 hours
Duration of Treatment: Z-Phase, 2 years.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Z-Phase: elevated cholesterol , plus at least one risk factor ( \> 70 years old, diabetes, history of prior heart or blood vessel disease, chest pain with EKG changes, elevation of cardiac lab work or positive cardiac tests , at least 2 heart vessels blocked \[one \>= 75% and one \>= 50%\])
Exclusion Criteria
* Z-Phase: elevation in certain cardiac blood tests, no significant heart damage at catheterization, planned cardiac surgery or specific cardiac drugs that lower cholesterol levels, within 6 weeks of enrollment
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Organon and Co
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Medical Monitor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Lemos JA, Blazing MA, Wiviott SD, Brady WE, White HD, Fox KA, Palmisano J, Ramsey KE, Bilheimer DW, Lewis EF, Pfeffer M, Califf RM, Braunwald E; Investigators. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients treated with tirofiban, aspirin and an early conservative initial management strategy: results from the A phase of the A-to-Z trial. Eur Heart J. 2004 Oct;25(19):1688-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.028.
de Lemos JA, Blazing MA, Wiviott SD, Lewis EF, Fox KA, White HD, Rouleau JL, Pedersen TR, Gardner LH, Mukherjee R, Ramsey KE, Palmisano J, Bilheimer DW, Pfeffer MA, Califf RM, Braunwald E; Investigators. Early intensive vs a delayed conservative simvastatin strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes: phase Z of the A to Z trial. JAMA. 2004 Sep 15;292(11):1307-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1307. Epub 2004 Aug 30.
Morrow DA, de Lemos JA, Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD, Blazing MA, Shui A, Rifai N, Califf RM, Braunwald E. Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein during follow-up of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Aggrastat-to-Zocor Trial. Circulation. 2006 Jul 25;114(4):281-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628909. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
Wiviott SD, de Lemos JA, Cannon CP, Blazing M, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Califf R, Braunwald E. A tale of two trials: a comparison of the post-acute coronary syndrome lipid-lowering trials A to Z and PROVE IT-TIMI 22. Circulation. 2006 Mar 21;113(11):1406-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.586347. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
de Lemos JA, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Blazing MA, Lewis EF, Califf RM, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Evaluation of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III algorithm for selecting candidates for statin therapy: insights from the A to Z trial. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 15;98(6):739-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.060. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
Morrow DA, de Lemos JA, Blazing MA, Sabatine MS, Murphy SA, Jarolim P, White HD, Fox KA, Califf RM, Braunwald E; Investigators. Prognostic value of serial B-type natriuretic peptide testing during follow-up of patients with unstable coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2866-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.22.2866.
Morrow DA, Wiviott SD, White HD, Nicolau JC, Bramucci E, Murphy SA, Bonaca MP, Ruff CT, Scirica BM, McCabe CH, Antman EM, Braunwald E. Effect of the novel thienopyridine prasugrel compared with clopidogrel on spontaneous and procedural myocardial infarction in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38: an application of the classification system from the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2009 Jun 2;119(21):2758-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.833665. Epub 2009 May 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2005_101
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
0733-180
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.