Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Compare the Efficacy of Pitavastatin With That of Atorvastatin in Lowering Cholesterol Levels (NCT NCT00249249)

NCT ID: NCT00249249

Last Updated: 2010-01-12

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

830 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to 12 weeks

Results posted on

2010-01-12

Participant Flow

First Patient In: 4 October 2005 Last Patient Out: 8 November 2006 A total of 39 investigators at 39 sites in India, Russia, Spain and Denmark received IRB approval to participate in this study and screened and randomized patients.

Patients with major protocol violations were identified programmatically prior to unblinding to determine who should be excluded from the per protocol population.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Overall Study
STARTED
321
103
303
103
Overall Study
Safety Population
316
102
300
103
Overall Study
COMPLETED
301
98
288
100
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
20
5
15
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Study to Compare the Efficacy of Pitavastatin With That of Atorvastatin in Lowering Cholesterol Levels

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=316 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=102 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=300 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=103 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Total
n=821 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
219 Participants
n=5 Participants
75 Participants
n=7 Participants
207 Participants
n=5 Participants
73 Participants
n=4 Participants
574 Participants
n=21 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=4 Participants
247 Participants
n=21 Participants
Age Continuous
58.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.51 • n=5 Participants
59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.63 • n=7 Participants
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=5 Participants
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.14 • n=4 Participants
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.58 • n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
174 Participants
n=5 Participants
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
164 Participants
n=5 Participants
55 Participants
n=4 Participants
443 Participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
142 Participants
n=5 Participants
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
136 Participants
n=5 Participants
48 Participants
n=4 Participants
378 Participants
n=21 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=301 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=98 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=288 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=100 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Percent Change From Baseline Low Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12
-37.89 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.841
-38.76 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.582
-45.5 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.005
-43.9 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.853

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

Percent change in total cholesterol from baseline to Week 12

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=301 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=98 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=288 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=100 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
-27.57 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.359
-28.92 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.441
-33.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.732
-32.99 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.073

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

percent change from baseline in high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=301 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=98 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=288 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=100 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
4.28 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.501
3.42 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.820
4.93 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.629
2.63 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.803

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

Ratio of mean total cholesterol to mean HDL-C at 12 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=301 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=98 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=288 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=100 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
TC:HDL-C Ratio
4.018 ratio
Standard Deviation 1.1294
3.763 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.8667
3.583 ratio
Standard Deviation 1.0961
3.79 ratio
Standard Deviation 1.2052

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

mean triglycerides at 12 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=302 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=98 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=288 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=100 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Triglycerides (TG)
132.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 59.82
122.2 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 57.09
124.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 64.91
122.6 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 59.01

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

Ratio of non-HDL to HDL at 12 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=234 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=82 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=250 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=82 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Non-HDL:HDL Ratio
2.993 (MEAN)
Standard Deviation 1.0935
2.770 (MEAN)
Standard Deviation 0.8846
2.601 (MEAN)
Standard Deviation 1.0961
2.710 (MEAN)
Standard Deviation 1.1771

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

Apolipoprotein B at 12 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=295 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=98 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=285 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=99 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
114.5 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 23.36
111.1 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 25.12
102.3 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 22.04
102.4 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 22.13

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

Apolipoprotein-A1 at 12 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=295 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=98 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=285 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=99 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Apolipoprotein-A1 (Apo-A1)
164.6 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 29.10
166 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 26.8
166.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 28.01
160.9 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 26.58

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

Ratio of Apo-B to Apo-A1 at 12 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=295 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=98 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=285 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=99 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Apo-B:Apo-A1 Ratio
0.72 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.228
0.68 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.181
0.64 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.198
0.66 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.205

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) at 12 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=301 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=97 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=288 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=100 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at 12 Weeks
2.87 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.101
2.39 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.053
3.12 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.186
2.56 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.958

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

oxidized low density lipoprotein at 12 weeks

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=302 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=98 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=289 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=100 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Oxidized LDL at 12 Weeks
59.93 U/L
Standard Deviation 14.96
58.59 U/L
Standard Deviation 14.679
54.32 U/L
Standard Deviation 13.496
54.70 U/L
Standard Deviation 17.865

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Population: All patients, irrespective of protocol violations, who had Week 12 measurements, whether on drug or not.

Number of patients achieving NCEP LDL-C target (LDL-C less than or equal to 130 mg/dL)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=315 Participants
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=102 Participants
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=298 Participants
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=102 Participants
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
National Cholesterol Education Program [NCEP]LDL-C Target Attainment
179 Patients
67 Patients
232 Patients
72 Patients

Adverse Events

Pitavastatin 2 mg QD

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 22 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Atorvastatin 10 mg QD

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Pitavastatin 4 mg QD

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 17 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Atorvastatin 20 mg QD

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=316 participants at risk
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=102 participants at risk
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=300 participants at risk
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=103 participants at risk
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
pruritus generalized
0.32%
1/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Cardiac disorders
acute myocardial infarction
0.32%
1/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Cardiac disorders
angina pectoris
0.00%
0/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.97%
1/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Cardiac disorders
angina unstable
0.00%
0/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.98%
1/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Cardiac disorders
myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.33%
1/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
deafness neurosensory
0.00%
0/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.97%
1/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Nervous system disorders
burning sensation
0.32%
1/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Nervous system disorders
encephalopathy
0.00%
0/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.97%
1/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
abortion spontaneous
0.32%
1/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Pitavastatin 2 mg QD
n=316 participants at risk
Pitavastatin 2 mg daily
Atorvastatin 10 mg QD
n=102 participants at risk
Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
Pitavastatin 4 mg QD
n=300 participants at risk
Pitavastatin 4 mg daily
Atorvastatin 20 mg QD
n=103 participants at risk
Atorvastatin 20 mg daily
Gastrointestinal disorders
constipation
2.2%
7/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.98%
1/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
1.0%
3/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.00%
0/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Infections and infestations
nasopharyngitis
3.2%
10/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
3.9%
4/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
2.7%
8/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
2.9%
3/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
myalgia
1.6%
5/316
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.98%
1/102
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
2.0%
6/300
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.
0.97%
1/103
Safety was assessed for all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population). The Safety Population contained 821 patients; 616 were treated with pitavastatin and 205 with atorvastatin.

Additional Information

Dr Neil Hounslow

Kowa Research Europe, Ltd.

Phone: +44 118 922 9004

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60