The Efficacy of Active Conservative Treatment for Patients With Severe Sciatica. A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT00246948

Last Updated: 2008-10-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

181 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-11-30

Study Completion Date

2003-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This Study si designed as a Prospective clinical controlled randomized trial.

Background:

Reviews have demonstrated no or little efficacy for passive conservative treatment modalities for patients suffering from sciatica. The results of surgery are conflicting. Cohort studies have shown a high efficacy for active treatment modalities in patients with sciatica. The current trend in treatment of low back pain without sciatica is focusing on active conservative treatment like information and advice to stay active and exercises.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of two active conservative treatment programs for patients with severe sciatica.

Methods: In a prospective clinical controlled randomized trial, 181 consecutive patients with radicular pain below the knee were examined at baseline, 8 weeks later at post treatment follow-up, and at one year follow-up and MR-scanned at baseline and one year follow-up. The treatment consisted of four elements: 1-3 were identical in both groups. 1. Thorough information concerning anatomy, pathogenesis, how discs heal without surgery, and encouragement to stay as active as possible but to reduce activity if an increase in leg pain occurs. 2." Tender love and care". 3. Medication; this was optional and only weak analgesic and NSAIDs were recommended.

Element 4 consisted of two different exercise programs. Symptom guided exercises consisted of a variety of back related exercises and optional manual treatment. The exercises were given after an algorithm, where different symptoms or a response to exercises determined the exercises given. The other group, Sham exercises had voluntary not back related exercises. The exercises were aimed at increasing the general blood circulation and maintaining strength in the extremities. Outcome measures were functional status, pain, MRI findings, clinical findings, and history

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Summary of Background Data. Sciatica as a result of a herniated disk is a fairly common problem; studies have shown a life time prevalence of 4-5 % in the Scandinavian population. Though a herniated disk is a benign disease with a relatively good prognosis, the pain and functional loss, are in most patients rather considerable over a period of some months Reviews have demonstrated no or little efficacy for passive conservative treatment modalities. Results for surgery are conflicting. Cohort studies have shown a high efficacy for active treatment modalities in patients with sciatica.

The current trend in back treatment is information and advice to stay active including active treatment modalities in which patients are given responsibility during the treatment process and the treatment assumes the role of a "coach".

Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of two active conservative treatment programs for patients with severe sciatica.

Methods A prospective clinical controlled randomized trial including 181 consecutive patients with radicular pain below the knee. The patients were examined at baseline, 8 weeks later at post treatment follow-up, and, and MR-scanned at baseline and at the one year follow-up The treatment consisted of four elements; 1-3 were identical in both groups. 1. Thorough information concerning anatomy, pathogenesis, how discs heal without surgery, and encouragement to stay as active as possible but to reduce activity if an increase in leg pain occurs. 2. Tender love and care. 3. Medication, this was optional and only weak analgesic and NSAID'S were recommended.

Element 4 was divided into a "Hands on" and "Hands off", utilizing two different exercise programs. "Hands on" consisted of a variety of back related exercises and optional manual treatment. The exercises were given after a strict algorithm, where different symptoms or a response to exercises determined the exercises given.

"Hands off" exercises were optional and generally not back related. They were geared towards increasing general blood circulation and maintaining strength in the extremities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sciatica

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Physical therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active conservative treatment of sciatica

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Radicular pain of dermatonal nature in one or both legs or below the knee Leg pain \> 3 on the eleven point box scale20 Radiating pain duration between two weeks and one year Age between 18 to 65 years

Exclusion Criteria

\- Cauda equine syndrome Not having Danish as first language Pending workers litigation claims Inability to follow the rehabilitation protocol, due to concomitant disease Previous back surgery Spinal tumors Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Back Research Center, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hanne B Albert, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Back Research Center, Funen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Back Research Center

Ringe, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VF 20010134

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id