The Efficacy of Active Conservative Treatment for Patients With Severe Sciatica. A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT00246948
Last Updated: 2008-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
181 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2001-11-30
2003-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Background:
Reviews have demonstrated no or little efficacy for passive conservative treatment modalities for patients suffering from sciatica. The results of surgery are conflicting. Cohort studies have shown a high efficacy for active treatment modalities in patients with sciatica. The current trend in treatment of low back pain without sciatica is focusing on active conservative treatment like information and advice to stay active and exercises.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of two active conservative treatment programs for patients with severe sciatica.
Methods: In a prospective clinical controlled randomized trial, 181 consecutive patients with radicular pain below the knee were examined at baseline, 8 weeks later at post treatment follow-up, and at one year follow-up and MR-scanned at baseline and one year follow-up. The treatment consisted of four elements: 1-3 were identical in both groups. 1. Thorough information concerning anatomy, pathogenesis, how discs heal without surgery, and encouragement to stay as active as possible but to reduce activity if an increase in leg pain occurs. 2." Tender love and care". 3. Medication; this was optional and only weak analgesic and NSAIDs were recommended.
Element 4 consisted of two different exercise programs. Symptom guided exercises consisted of a variety of back related exercises and optional manual treatment. The exercises were given after an algorithm, where different symptoms or a response to exercises determined the exercises given. The other group, Sham exercises had voluntary not back related exercises. The exercises were aimed at increasing the general blood circulation and maintaining strength in the extremities. Outcome measures were functional status, pain, MRI findings, clinical findings, and history
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The current trend in back treatment is information and advice to stay active including active treatment modalities in which patients are given responsibility during the treatment process and the treatment assumes the role of a "coach".
Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of two active conservative treatment programs for patients with severe sciatica.
Methods A prospective clinical controlled randomized trial including 181 consecutive patients with radicular pain below the knee. The patients were examined at baseline, 8 weeks later at post treatment follow-up, and, and MR-scanned at baseline and at the one year follow-up The treatment consisted of four elements; 1-3 were identical in both groups. 1. Thorough information concerning anatomy, pathogenesis, how discs heal without surgery, and encouragement to stay as active as possible but to reduce activity if an increase in leg pain occurs. 2. Tender love and care. 3. Medication, this was optional and only weak analgesic and NSAID'S were recommended.
Element 4 was divided into a "Hands on" and "Hands off", utilizing two different exercise programs. "Hands on" consisted of a variety of back related exercises and optional manual treatment. The exercises were given after a strict algorithm, where different symptoms or a response to exercises determined the exercises given.
"Hands off" exercises were optional and generally not back related. They were geared towards increasing general blood circulation and maintaining strength in the extremities.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active conservative treatment of sciatica
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Back Research Center, Denmark
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hanne B Albert, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Back Research Center, Funen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Back Research Center
Ringe, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VF 20010134
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id