Randomized Study of Not Giving Diphteria-tetanus-pertussis Vaccination With or After Measles Vaccination

NCT ID: NCT00244673

Last Updated: 2012-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

6534 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-10-31

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In non-randomized studies, routine childhood vaccinations have been observed to have non-targeted effects. Difteria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine provided with or after measles vaccine (MV) is associated with increased mortality in areas with herd immunity to pertussis.

We will examine in a randomised study of 6000 children the effect of not administering DTP simultaneously with or after MV on overall child mortality, hospitalization rates, and the immunological responses after vaccination. We will also examine potential sex-differential effects in the outcomes and interactions with other vaccines, other health interventions and season.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Infectious diseases are the main cause of high child mortality in Africa. In several non-randomised studies, routine childhood vaccinations have been observed to have non-targeted effects. Live vaccines like measles vaccine (MV) seem to protect against overall mortality, whereas killed vaccines, like DTP, may have no beneficial effects, especially for girls. DTP provided with or after MV may be associated with increased mortality. The mechanisms behind these effects are unknown.

Hypothesis: Not providing DTP together with or after MV is associated with a 35 % reduction in overall mortality and 23% reduction in hospitalizations.

Objectives: To examine in a randomised study of 6000 children the effect of not administering DTP simultaneously with or after MV on

1. Overall child mortality
2. Hospitalization rates and major causes of hospitalization
3. The immunological profile after vaccination
4. Sex-differences in the above mentioned outcomes

Methods:

Surveillance system: BHP's demographic surveillance system in Bissau covers 6 districts with a population of 90,000; 3,500 children are born each year.

Hospitalizations: There is only one pediatric ward in Bissau and all hospitalizations are identified in the BHP register.

Vaccinations: Vaccinations are provided and registered at the 3 health centres in the study area.

Intervention: In this study 6000 children are randomised as they come to receive DTP3 or DTP booster with or after measles vaccination (MV) at the local health centres. Children will be randomised to DTP3+OPV3 and MV versus OPV3 and MV or DTP4+OPV4 versus OPV4 (booster doses).

Follow-up: The children will be followed until 4 years of age or end of study.

1. Adverse effects: In the first month after vaccination, 1000 children will be visited daily for three days and then weekly to register morbidity and consultations.
2. Hospitalizations: The children will be followed at the pediatric ward.
3. Mortality: Children will be followed by the routine surveillance system. Furthermore, all children will be visited yearly and finally when they reach four years of age. When a death is detected, a physician will conduct a verbal autopsy.

Sample size: With a total of 7500 person-years of follow-up, we will be able to document a 35% reduction in mortality and a 23% reduction in hospitalizations. A subgroup of children will be examined for possible differences in immunological profile after vaccination.

Ethical considerations: Herd immunity to pertussis should not be affected as, due to the intervention, more children is vaccinated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mortality Hospitalization Adverse Events

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DTP3/4+OPV+MV versus OPV+MV or DTP4+OPV4 versus OPV4

Trial of not providing 3. and/or 4. DTP together with or after MV at 9 to 18 month of age.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The child should be missing DTP3 or DTP4
2. The child should have received DTP2
3. The child should have received MV already or receive MV on the day of enrolment

Exclusion Criteria

Normally applied contraindications for receiving vaccinations, including high fever
Minimum Eligible Age

9 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

4 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bandim Health Project

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Aaby, DMSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bandim Health Project

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bandim Health Project, Apartado 861

Bissau, , Guinea-Bissau

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Guinea-Bissau

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CVEK2005-7041-45

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CVEK2005-7041-45-DTPMV

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Measles Vaccination at Health System Contacts
NCT04220671 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4
Prophylactic Antibiotics in Measles
NCT00168532 COMPLETED PHASE3
Long-term Follow-up of Measles Antibodies
NCT00168571 COMPLETED PHASE4
Early Two-dose Measles Vaccination Trial
NCT00168558 COMPLETED PHASE4
Measles Vaccine in HCW
NCT04357028 SUSPENDED PHASE3
Unravelling the Measles Paradox in Children
NCT06923631 NOT_YET_RECRUITING