Trial Outcomes & Findings for Paclitaxel and Radiation Therapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Bladder Cancer (NCT NCT00238420)

NCT ID: NCT00238420

Last Updated: 2022-07-19

Results Overview

In each group, the number of patients was tabulated by type and grade (gr) of treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE v3.0). Only the following types of toxicity within 90 days of treatment start were considered: ≥ gr4 neutropenia, ≥ gr4 febrile neutropenia, ≥ gr3 diarrhea, ≥ gr3 nausea/vomiting, ≥ gr3 thrombocytopenia, ≥ gr3 renal, pulmonary, hepatic, or neurologic toxicity, ≥ gr3 rectal or genitourinary bleeding, ≥ gr3 left ventricular failure, or ≥ gr2 other cardiac toxicity. The study was designed to estimate the rate of acute treatment-related toxicity separately in each group of patients. Using the Fleming's one-sample multiple test procedure with Type I and II errors each set at 10%, 40 cases/group were required to reject the null hypothesis that the true toxicity rate is greater than 25% in favor of the alternative hypothesis that the true rate is no more than 10%. Six or more patients with the designated toxicities out of 40 would result in rejecting the null hypothesis.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

70 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From start of protocol treatment to 90 days

Results posted on

2022-07-19

Participant Flow

After patient registration, sites submitted tissue to central her2/neu evaluation. If tissue was evaluable and a patient continued on study, then treatment arm was assigned. Seventy-six patients were registered and 6 did not continue to treatment assignment: 2 patient withdrawal, 2 protocol violation, 1 progressive disease, 1 institutional error.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Overall Study
STARTED
22
48
Overall Study
COMPLETED
21
47
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
1
1

Baseline Characteristics

Paclitaxel and Radiation Therapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Bladder Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Total
n=68 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
80 years
n=5 Participants
73 years
n=7 Participants
75 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
55 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From start of protocol treatment to 90 days

Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment

In each group, the number of patients was tabulated by type and grade (gr) of treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE v3.0). Only the following types of toxicity within 90 days of treatment start were considered: ≥ gr4 neutropenia, ≥ gr4 febrile neutropenia, ≥ gr3 diarrhea, ≥ gr3 nausea/vomiting, ≥ gr3 thrombocytopenia, ≥ gr3 renal, pulmonary, hepatic, or neurologic toxicity, ≥ gr3 rectal or genitourinary bleeding, ≥ gr3 left ventricular failure, or ≥ gr2 other cardiac toxicity. The study was designed to estimate the rate of acute treatment-related toxicity separately in each group of patients. Using the Fleming's one-sample multiple test procedure with Type I and II errors each set at 10%, 40 cases/group were required to reject the null hypothesis that the true toxicity rate is greater than 25% in favor of the alternative hypothesis that the true rate is no more than 10%. Six or more patients with the designated toxicities out of 40 would result in rejecting the null hypothesis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Acute Treatment-related Toxicity
7 participants
14 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From registration to end of treatment; up to 64 days."

Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment

The number of patients within each group who completed all elements of protocol treatment are reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Treatment Completion
13 participants
34 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 12 weeks from treatment start

Population: All eligible patients who started treatment and had an evaluation to assess response by 12 weeks

The number of patients within each group who achieved a complete response to protocol treatment by 12 weeks are reported. Complete response is defined as no gross tumor at cystoscopy or negative biopsies or both by week 12 after completion of protocol treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=13 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=33 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Complete Response to Treatment
61.5 percentage of participants
Interval 31.6 to 86.1
57.6 percentage of participants
Interval 39.2 to 74.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From start of treatment to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.9 years.

Population: Eligible participants who started treatment. (This population changed since the initial analysis: 3 participants first thought to be eligible were later determined to be ineligible.)

Disease (failure) is defined as any bladder cancer progression determined by all measures of disease including physical exam, imaging, and biopsies. Disease-free survival time is defined as time from treatment start to the date of first progression, death, or last known follow-up (censored). Disease-free survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analysis occurred after all patients had been on study for at least 5 years. This is a non-randomized phase I/II trial in which the two patient groups are not compared.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=20 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=45 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Progression-free Survival
1.1 years
Interval 0.6 to 2.8
0.8 years
Interval 0.4 to 3.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From the date of treatment started to death, assessed up to at least 5 years

Population: Eligible participants who started treatment. (This population changed since the initial analysis: 3 participants first thought to be eligible were later determined to be ineligible.)

Overall survival time is defined as time from treatment start to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analysis occurred after all patients had been on study for at least 5 years. This is a non-randomized phase I/II trial in which the two patient groups are not compared.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=20 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=45 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Overall Survival
2.8 years
Interval 1.1 to 4.4
2.0 years
Interval 1.1 to 8.5

Adverse Events

HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 20 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel

Serious events: 15 serious events
Other events: 46 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 participants at risk
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 participants at risk
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoglobin
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischemia
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular arrhythmia NOS
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain NOS
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic perforation
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea NOS
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctitis NOS
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting NOS
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
General disorders
Edema: limb
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
General disorders
Sudden death
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatobiliary/pancreas - Other
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Infections and infestations
Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils (ANC <1.0 x 10e9/L): Urinary tract NOS
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Infections and infestations
Kidney infection NOS
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia NOS
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection NOS
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular access NOS complication
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Leukopenia NOS
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Lymphopenia
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Psychiatric disorders
Personality change
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder pain
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric stenosis
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral pain
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis NOS
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Vascular disorders
Hematoma
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension NOS
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 participants at risk
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 participants at risk
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood/bone marrow - Other
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoglobin
71.4%
15/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
53.2%
25/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain NOS
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
25.5%
12/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea NOS
57.1%
12/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
78.7%
37/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
23.8%
5/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
34.0%
16/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctitis NOS
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal hemorrhage
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting NOS
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
General disorders
Edema: limb
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
25.5%
12/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
General disorders
Fatigue
71.4%
15/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
83.0%
39/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
General disorders
Pain - Other
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Infections and infestations
Infection with unknown ANC: Urinary tract NOS
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Infections and infestations
Opportunisitic infection
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection NOS
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
12.8%
6/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dermatitis radiation NOS
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
28.6%
6/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
27.7%
13/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Leukopenia NOS
47.6%
10/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
31.9%
15/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Lymphopenia
38.1%
8/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Metabolic/laboratory - Other
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Neutrophil count
23.8%
5/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
23.8%
5/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Prothrombin time prolonged
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Investigations
Weight decreased
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
25.5%
12/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
38.1%
8/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
29.8%
14/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
10.6%
5/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia NOS
28.6%
6/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
23.4%
11/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
23.8%
5/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcemia
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
31.9%
15/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle weakness NOS
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
12.8%
6/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
10.6%
5/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral motor neuropathy
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
17.0%
8/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder pain
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
19.1%
9/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder spasm
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
12.8%
6/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder stenosis
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Cystitis NOS
57.1%
12/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
36.2%
17/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
57.1%
12/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
51.1%
24/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal/genitourinary - Other
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric obstruction
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral pain
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary bladder hemorrhage
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
19.1%
9/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary incontinence
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
12.8%
6/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic pain NOS
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
17.0%
8/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic NOS
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis exfoliative NOS
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension NOS
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension NOS
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
10.6%
5/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.

Additional Information

Wendy Seiferheld, M.S.

NRG Oncology

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60