Trial Outcomes & Findings for Paclitaxel and Radiation Therapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Bladder Cancer (NCT NCT00238420)
NCT ID: NCT00238420
Last Updated: 2022-07-19
Results Overview
In each group, the number of patients was tabulated by type and grade (gr) of treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE v3.0). Only the following types of toxicity within 90 days of treatment start were considered: ≥ gr4 neutropenia, ≥ gr4 febrile neutropenia, ≥ gr3 diarrhea, ≥ gr3 nausea/vomiting, ≥ gr3 thrombocytopenia, ≥ gr3 renal, pulmonary, hepatic, or neurologic toxicity, ≥ gr3 rectal or genitourinary bleeding, ≥ gr3 left ventricular failure, or ≥ gr2 other cardiac toxicity. The study was designed to estimate the rate of acute treatment-related toxicity separately in each group of patients. Using the Fleming's one-sample multiple test procedure with Type I and II errors each set at 10%, 40 cases/group were required to reject the null hypothesis that the true toxicity rate is greater than 25% in favor of the alternative hypothesis that the true rate is no more than 10%. Six or more patients with the designated toxicities out of 40 would result in rejecting the null hypothesis.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
70 participants
From start of protocol treatment to 90 days
2022-07-19
Participant Flow
After patient registration, sites submitted tissue to central her2/neu evaluation. If tissue was evaluable and a patient continued on study, then treatment arm was assigned. Seventy-six patients were registered and 6 did not continue to treatment assignment: 2 patient withdrawal, 2 protocol violation, 1 progressive disease, 1 institutional error.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22
|
48
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
21
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Paclitaxel and Radiation Therapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Bladder Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
Total
n=68 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
80 years
n=5 Participants
|
73 years
n=7 Participants
|
75 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of protocol treatment to 90 daysPopulation: All eligible patients who started study treatment
In each group, the number of patients was tabulated by type and grade (gr) of treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE v3.0). Only the following types of toxicity within 90 days of treatment start were considered: ≥ gr4 neutropenia, ≥ gr4 febrile neutropenia, ≥ gr3 diarrhea, ≥ gr3 nausea/vomiting, ≥ gr3 thrombocytopenia, ≥ gr3 renal, pulmonary, hepatic, or neurologic toxicity, ≥ gr3 rectal or genitourinary bleeding, ≥ gr3 left ventricular failure, or ≥ gr2 other cardiac toxicity. The study was designed to estimate the rate of acute treatment-related toxicity separately in each group of patients. Using the Fleming's one-sample multiple test procedure with Type I and II errors each set at 10%, 40 cases/group were required to reject the null hypothesis that the true toxicity rate is greater than 25% in favor of the alternative hypothesis that the true rate is no more than 10%. Six or more patients with the designated toxicities out of 40 would result in rejecting the null hypothesis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acute Treatment-related Toxicity
|
7 participants
|
14 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From registration to end of treatment; up to 64 days."Population: All eligible patients who started study treatment
The number of patients within each group who completed all elements of protocol treatment are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Completion
|
13 participants
|
34 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 12 weeks from treatment startPopulation: All eligible patients who started treatment and had an evaluation to assess response by 12 weeks
The number of patients within each group who achieved a complete response to protocol treatment by 12 weeks are reported. Complete response is defined as no gross tumor at cystoscopy or negative biopsies or both by week 12 after completion of protocol treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=13 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=33 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Complete Response to Treatment
|
61.5 percentage of participants
Interval 31.6 to 86.1
|
57.6 percentage of participants
Interval 39.2 to 74.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of treatment to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.9 years.Population: Eligible participants who started treatment. (This population changed since the initial analysis: 3 participants first thought to be eligible were later determined to be ineligible.)
Disease (failure) is defined as any bladder cancer progression determined by all measures of disease including physical exam, imaging, and biopsies. Disease-free survival time is defined as time from treatment start to the date of first progression, death, or last known follow-up (censored). Disease-free survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analysis occurred after all patients had been on study for at least 5 years. This is a non-randomized phase I/II trial in which the two patient groups are not compared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=20 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=45 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival
|
1.1 years
Interval 0.6 to 2.8
|
0.8 years
Interval 0.4 to 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of treatment started to death, assessed up to at least 5 yearsPopulation: Eligible participants who started treatment. (This population changed since the initial analysis: 3 participants first thought to be eligible were later determined to be ineligible.)
Overall survival time is defined as time from treatment start to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analysis occurred after all patients had been on study for at least 5 years. This is a non-randomized phase I/II trial in which the two patient groups are not compared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=20 Participants
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=45 Participants
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
2.8 years
Interval 1.1 to 4.4
|
2.0 years
Interval 1.1 to 8.5
|
Adverse Events
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 participants at risk
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 participants at risk
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoglobin
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischemia
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular arrhythmia NOS
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain NOS
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic perforation
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea NOS
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctitis NOS
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting NOS
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Edema: limb
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden death
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatobiliary/pancreas - Other
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils (ANC <1.0 x 10e9/L): Urinary tract NOS
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Kidney infection NOS
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia NOS
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection NOS
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular access NOS complication
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Leukopenia NOS
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphopenia
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Personality change
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder pain
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric stenosis
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral pain
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis NOS
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hematoma
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension NOS
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
HER2+ :RT, Paclitaxel, and Trastuzumab
n=21 participants at risk
Paclitaxel and trastuzumab chemotherapy with concurrent with radiation therapy
|
HER2- :RT and Paclitaxel
n=47 participants at risk
Paclitaxel chemotherapy concurrent with radiation therapy
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood/bone marrow - Other
|
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hemoglobin
|
71.4%
15/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
53.2%
25/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain NOS
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
25.5%
12/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea NOS
|
57.1%
12/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
78.7%
37/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
23.8%
5/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
34.0%
16/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctitis NOS
|
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal hemorrhage
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting NOS
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Edema: limb
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
25.5%
12/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
71.4%
15/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
83.0%
39/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Pain - Other
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection with unknown ANC: Urinary tract NOS
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Opportunisitic infection
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection NOS
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
12.8%
6/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dermatitis radiation NOS
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
28.6%
6/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
27.7%
13/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Leukopenia NOS
|
47.6%
10/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
31.9%
15/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphopenia
|
38.1%
8/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Metabolic/laboratory - Other
|
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count
|
23.8%
5/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
23.8%
5/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Prothrombin time prolonged
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
25.5%
12/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
38.1%
8/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
29.8%
14/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
10.6%
5/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia NOS
|
28.6%
6/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
23.4%
11/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
|
23.8%
5/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcemia
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
31.9%
15/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle weakness NOS
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
12.8%
6/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
10.6%
5/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral motor neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
17.0%
8/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder pain
|
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
19.1%
9/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder spasm
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
12.8%
6/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder stenosis
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Cystitis NOS
|
57.1%
12/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
36.2%
17/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
57.1%
12/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
51.1%
24/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal/genitourinary - Other
|
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
4.3%
2/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric obstruction
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral pain
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary bladder hemorrhage
|
19.0%
4/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
19.1%
9/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary incontinence
|
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
12.8%
6/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic pain NOS
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
21.3%
10/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
14.3%
3/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
17.0%
8/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic NOS
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
6.4%
3/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
0.00%
0/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
14.9%
7/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis exfoliative NOS
|
4.8%
1/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
8.5%
4/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension NOS
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
2.1%
1/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension NOS
|
9.5%
2/21
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
10.6%
5/47
Subjects experiencing more than one of a given serious adverse event (SAE) are counted only once for that SAE. The same methodology was applied for non-serious adverse events.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60