Randomized Phase III Trial of Leukine® vs Neupogen® in Patients Receiving Cisplatin & Gemcitabine for Urothelial Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00237575

Last Updated: 2012-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-11-30

Study Completion Date

2006-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Leukine \& Neupogen to decrease the incidence of grade 3 \& 4 neutropenia in the treatment of patients receiving cisplatin \& gemcitabine for urothelial (bladder) cancer.

All patients will receive chemotherapy with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in six 21-day cycles. Patients will also receive either Leukine (Arm A) or Neupogen (Arm B).

Patient Population: 100 patients will be enrolled (n=100) in this study. Patients cannot have undergone previous chemotherapy. Approximately 50 patients will be enrolled into each treatment arm.

Test Product, Dose, Mode of Administration: All patients will receive chemotherapy treatment with cisplatin (70 mg/kg) on Day 1 and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on Days 1, 8, \& 15 of each 21-day cycle. Patients will be randomized to receive either Leukine (250 µg/m2) or Neupogen (5 µg/kg) injected under the skin on Days 2-6, 9-13, \& 16-20 of each cycle.

Duration of Treatment: Patients will receive a maximum of six 21-day cycles of treatment. The overall trial, including follow-up, is expected to be 3 years in duration.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of Leukine and Neupogen in the treatment of patients receiving cisplatin and gemcitabine for regionally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer in regard to reduction of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia. Secondary objectives include a comparison of: hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities, anti-tumor effects, dose intensity, and quality of life in each treatment arm.

Methodology: The study will be a multi-institutional, randomized, phase III study in patients with regionally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. All patients will receive chemotherapy with cisplatin plus gemcitabine for six 21-day cycles. Patients will receive hematopoietic growth factor support with either Leukine (Arm A), or Neupogen (Arm B). Rates of anti-tumor responses and the incidence of toxicities in each treatment arm will provide a comparison of efficacy and safety for the hematopoietic support regimens.

Patient Population: Patients to be enrolled (n=100) in this study will have received a diagnosis of regionally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer of the bladder, ureter, or renal pelvis and will have not undergone previous systemic chemotherapy. Approximately 50 patients will be enrolled into each treatment arm.

Main Criteria for Inclusion: Inclusion criteria for this study specify that patients have evaluable, biopsy-proven, surgically unresectable, regionally advanced, or metastatic urothelial cancer of the bladder, ureter, or renal pelvis. Additionally, patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. Patients who have undergone previous systemic chemotherapy will be excluded from this study.

Test Product, Dose, Mode of Administration: All patients will receive chemotherapeutic treatment with cisplatin (70 mg/kg) intravenously on Day 1 and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. Patients will be randomized to receive either Leukine (250 µg/m2) or Neupogen (5 µg/kg) subcutaneously on Days 2-6, 9-13, and 16-20 of each cycle.

Duration of Treatment: Patients will receive a maximum of six 21-day cycles of treatment. The overall trial, including follow-up, is expected to be 3 years in duration.

Criteria for Evaluation: Efficacy will be assessed by, incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities, evaluation of complete and partial response, time to progression, overall and disease specific survival, planned vs administered doses, and quality of life. Safety will be assessed by, vital signs, physical examinations, clinical laboratory evaluations, and the reporting of adverse events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bladder Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

gemcitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

sargramostim

Intervention Type DRUG

filgrastim

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Biopsy-proven, regionally advanced (T4b, N2, N3), or metastatic (M1) urothelial cancer of the bladder, ureter, or renal pelvis
* A minimum of one target lesion according to the RECIST criteria (Appendix D). Note: Bone metastases, leptomeningeal disease, ascites, pleural or pericardial effusions, lymphangitic spread or cystic lesions are not acceptable as target lesions.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2 (Appendix B).
* Age \>/=18 years or the age of majority in the state of the participating institution.
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test and must be willing to consent to using effective contraception while on treatment and for a reasonable period thereafter. Post menopausal women must have been amenorrheic for at least 12 months to be considered of non-childbearing potential.
* An expected survival of at least four months.
* Adequate organ and marrow function as defined as follows:

* leukocytes \>/=3,000/µl,
* absolute neutrophil count \>/=1,500/µl,
* hemoglobin \>/=8.0g/dl,
* platelets \>/=100,000/µl,
* total bilirubin and serum creatinine must be \< 1.5 mg/dl
* liver transaminases (SGOT and/or SGPT) may be up to 2.5 x institutional ULN if alkaline phosphatase is \</=ULN, or
* alkaline phosphatase may be up to 4 x ULN if transaminases are \</=ULN.
* Patients who have undergone previous radiation therapy or surgery may be enrolled into the study but such treatment must have been completed 4 or more weeks prior to entry to the study and the patient must have recovered. Further, patients who have undergone radiotherapy may not have received radiation to \> 25% of the bone marrow. Previous intravesicular immunotherapy and chemotherapy are allowed.
* Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria

* Undergone previous systemic chemotherapy.
* Major surgery \<4 weeks prior to study treatment start, or lack of complete recovery from major surgery.
* Participation in any investigational drug study within 4 weeks preceding treatment start.
* History of uncontrolled seizures, central nervous system disorders or psychiatric disability judged by the Investigator to be significant enough to preclude informed consent or interfering with compliance for oral drug intake.
* Previous history of cancer unless treatment was curative and completed \>/=5 years prior to entry onto study, or unless diagnosed as one of the following: in situ carcinoma (any location), basal cell carcinoma, or non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to: ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled or untreated cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
* Pregnant women are excluded from this study because of the teratogenic potential of cisplatin and gemcitabine. Lactating women are also excluded. (Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.)
* Peripheral neuropathy \>/= grade 2.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Kentucky

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Rinehart, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Kentucky

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

New York Medical College

Hawthorne, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04-GU-53B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.