Trial Outcomes & Findings for Spread of Dermatophytes Among Families (NCT NCT00233493)
NCT ID: NCT00233493
Last Updated: 2024-11-01
Results Overview
To identify dermatophytes isolates known to cause onychomycosis and/or tinea pedis by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
COMPLETED
50 participants
Baseline
2024-11-01
Participant Flow
Unit of analysis: Households
Participant milestones
| Measure |
One Infected Member
One infected member in multiple person household
|
2 or More Infected Members
Two or more infected members in a multiple person household
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
32 32
|
18 18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
32 32
|
18 18
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Spread of Dermatophytes Among Families
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Single Person Households
n=32 Participants
Households with at least 1 resident with tinea pedis and/or onychommycosis.
|
Multiperson Households
n=18 Participants
Households with at least 2 residents and 1 individual with tinea pedis and /or onychommycosis.
|
Total
n=50 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.73 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.61 • n=5 Participants
|
50.33 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.80 • n=7 Participants
|
54.03 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
32 participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineTo identify dermatophytes isolates known to cause onychomycosis and/or tinea pedis by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SIM Households
n=32 Households
SIM Households in which dermatophyte isolates were isolated
|
MIM Households
n=18 Households
MIM Households in which dermatophyte isolates were identified
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dermatophyte Species Distribution
T Rubrum Isolates
|
50 isolates
|
37 isolates
|
|
Dermatophyte Species Distribution
T Mentagrophytes Isolates
|
5 isolates
|
12 isolates
|
|
Dermatophyte Species Distribution
E Floccosum Isolates
|
2 isolates
|
1 isolates
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineUsing southern blot analysis and RFLP to evaluate the isolates and strain types obtained from all enrolled households
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SIM Households
n=32 Households
SIM Households in which dermatophyte isolates were isolated
|
MIM Households
n=18 Households
MIM Households in which dermatophyte isolates were identified
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dermatophyte Strain Types Among All Enrolled Households
T rubrum strain type
|
50 isolates
|
37 isolates
|
|
Dermatophyte Strain Types Among All Enrolled Households
T mentagrophytes strain types
|
5 isolates
|
12 isolates
|
|
Dermatophyte Strain Types Among All Enrolled Households
E Floccosum strain types
|
2 isolates
|
1 isolates
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: This outcome measure was intended to identify the number of households with dermatophyte infection spread in multiple infected member households only.
To determine if dermatophyte infection in household members could spread to other members, we analyzed the Southern blot and RFLP band patterns for different clinical isolates obtained from members residing in the same MIM households.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SIM Households
n=18 Households
SIM Households in which dermatophyte isolates were isolated
|
MIM Households
MIM Households in which dermatophyte isolates were identified
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Households With Dermatophyte Infection Spread
Spread of Infection due to T Rubrum Isolates
|
7 Households
|
—
|
|
Number of Households With Dermatophyte Infection Spread
Spread of Infection due to T Mentagrophytes Isolates
|
1 Households
|
—
|
|
Number of Households With Dermatophyte Infection Spread
No Spread of Infection
|
10 Households
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineThe relationship between spread of infection and whether a subject previously had onychomycosis, tinea pedis, or onychomycosis plus tinea pedis was investigated. We collected how many subjects had spread of infection and onychomycosis alone, or spread of infection and tinea pedis alone, as well as how many subjects had spread of infection and onychomycosis plus tinea pedis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SIM Households
n=32 Households
SIM Households in which dermatophyte isolates were isolated
|
MIM Households
n=18 Households
MIM Households in which dermatophyte isolates were identified
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Affected by the Association of Spread of Infection and History of Tinea Pedis or Onychomycosis
Spread of Infection and history of tinea pedis or onychomycosis
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Affected by the Association of Spread of Infection and History of Tinea Pedis or Onychomycosis
Spread of Infection and history of both tinea pedis and onychomycosis
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
Multi Person Households
Single Person Household
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Mahmoud Ghannoum
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Center for Medical Mycology
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place