Comparing Different Ways of Delivering Humidity to Children With Croup

NCT ID: NCT00230841

Last Updated: 2013-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

129 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-09-30

Study Completion Date

2004-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Croup affects 5% of children under 6 years of age, resulting in visits to hospital Emergency Departments, and in 1% of children, hospitalization. Traditionally, the first therapy offered is humidification which can liquify airway secretions and decrease airway swelling. This study will compare the effectivenesss of 40% and 100% humidity through a specially designed machine called a nebulizer, with the usual humidity set-up (blown into the patient's face from a hose).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Croup

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

croup humidity therapy pediatrics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

nebulized humidity

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* children aged 3 months - 10 years
* croup score greater than or equal to 2 after a 30 minute waiting period

Exclusion Criteria

* Symptoms of croup requiring immediate intervention with nebulized epinephrine or intubation
* symptoms or signs of alternative causes of stridor
* inability of caregivers to understand or speak English and/or sign for informed consent
* history of chronic pulmonary disease except for asthma, or co-existent systemic disease
* previous history of intubation
* duration of present illness \>1 week
* systemic or inhaled glucocorticoids in previous 48 hours
* epinephrine in previous 4 hours
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Hospital for Sick Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dennis Scolnik

Staff Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dennis Scolnik, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Scolnik D, Coates AL, Stephens D, Da Silva Z, Lavine E, Schuh S. Controlled delivery of high vs low humidity vs mist therapy for croup in emergency departments: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1274-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1274.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16537737 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0020010158

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id