Erlotinib in Treating Patients With Progressive Glioblastoma Multiforme
NCT ID: NCT00227032
Last Updated: 2012-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-09-30
2008-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of erlotinib in treating patients with progressive glioblastoma multiforme.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erlotinib in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Glioblastoma Multiforme
NCT00054496
Erlotinib in Treating Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma or Recurrent or Progressive Meningioma
NCT00045110
Radiation Therapy, Temozolomide, and Erlotinib in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme
NCT00274833
Erlotinib and Sorafenib in Treating Patients With Progressive or Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme
NCT00445588
Ph II Erlotinib + Sirolimus for Pts w Recurrent Malignant Glioma Multiforme
NCT00672243
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Determine the maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib hydrochloride when administered in escalating doses every 72 hours in patients with progressive glioblastoma multiforme.
Secondary
* Determine the relationship between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of erlotinib hydrochloride in these patients.
* Determine the relationship between plasma and CSF concentrations of erlotinib hydrochloride in patients not receiving concurrent enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) vs those receiving concurrent EIAEDs.
* Correlate CYP3A4 activity, as measured by midazolam hydrochloride clearance, with plasma clearance of erlotinib hydrochloride in these patients.
* Correlate CYP1A2 activity, as measured by the 4-hour paraxanthine (17X)/caffeine (137X) plasma ratio, with plasma clearance of erlotinib hydrochloride in these patients.
* Determine, preliminarily, objective response and disease progression in patients treated with erlotinib hydrochloride.
* Correlate the presence of EGFRvIII mutation with objective response and disease progression in patients treated with erlotinib hydrochloride.
OUTLINE: This is an open-label, dose-escalation study. Patients are stratified according to use of concurrent enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) (yes vs no).
Patients receive oral erlotinib hydrochloride once every 72 hours for 28 days. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Cohorts of 3-6 patients receive escalating doses\* of erlotinib hydrochloride until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is determined or preliminary results show no direct relationship between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations. The MTD is defined as the dose preceding that at which 2 of 3 or 2 of 6 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity.
NOTE: \*Interim enrollment of patients is allowed; these patients receive the current approved dose of erlotinib hydrochloride.
Patients undergo blood sample collection periodically on day 13 for pharmacokinetic studies. The pharmacokinetic study comprises midazolam hydrochloride and caffeine clearance assessment and correlation of these assessments with CYP3A4 activity and CYP1A2 activity.
Paraffin-embedded and frozen tumor tissue is obtained from patients who underwent prior surgical resection for analysis of wild-type EGFR and EGFRvIII mutation by immunohistochemistry.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then at 1 month and 6 months.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Subjects receiving EIAEDs
Patients will be stratified according to concurrent use of enzyme inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIAED)
erlotinib hydrochloride
300 mg, per day for subjects taking EIAEDs
150 mg, per day for those NOT taking EIAEDs
Subjects NOT taking EIAEDs
Patients will be stratified according to concurrent use of enzyme inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIAED)
erlotinib hydrochloride
300 mg, per day for subjects taking EIAEDs
150 mg, per day for those NOT taking EIAEDs
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
erlotinib hydrochloride
300 mg, per day for subjects taking EIAEDs
150 mg, per day for those NOT taking EIAEDs
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically confirmed glioblastoma multiforme (or high-grade glioma that is behaving clinically and/or radiographically like glioblastoma multiforme)
* Progressed after first-line therapy (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* Karnofsky performance status 60-100%
* ANC \> 1,500/mm³
* Platelet count \> 100,000/mm³
* Hemoglobin \> 8.5 g/dL
* ALT and AST \< 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Alkaline phosphatase \< 2 times ULN
* Bilirubin \< 1.5 mg/dL
* Creatinine \< 1.5 mg/dL OR creatinine clearance \> 50 mL/min
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* No diagnosis or history of significant renal or hepatic disease
* No contraindication (e.g., mass effect, brain shift) to lumbar puncture procedure
* No active infection
* No diagnosis or history of corneal abnormalities
* No diagnosis or history of malabsorptive syndrome or other disorder affecting gastrointestinal absorption
* No history of hypersensitivity reactions to midazolam hydrochloride (CYP3A4 biomarker)
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* See Disease Characteristics
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Celeste Lindley, PharmD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Frances A. Collichio, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDR0000550155
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
LCCC 0424
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.