Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cetuximab, Radiotherapy and Twice Weekly Gemcitabine to Treat Pancreatic Cancer (NCT NCT00225784)
NCT ID: NCT00225784
Last Updated: 2014-07-16
Results Overview
Per RECIST Criteria (v. 1.0) and assessed by CT scan: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (SLD)of target lesions at baseline; Progressive Disease (PD), \>=20% increase in the SLD of target lesions at baseline; Stable Disease (SD), Neither sufficient decrease in SLD to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase in SLD to qualify for PD.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
37 participants
one month post-therapy
2014-07-16
Participant Flow
This was a single-institution study of weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma conducted at Dartmouth-Hitchcock.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy
Weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Cetuximab, Radiotherapy and Twice Weekly Gemcitabine to Treat Pancreatic Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cetuximab/Gemcitabine/Radiotherapy
n=37 Participants
weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
Between 18 and 65 years
|
54.7 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
>=65 years
|
73.1 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one month post-therapyPopulation: Completion of treatment
Per RECIST Criteria (v. 1.0) and assessed by CT scan: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (SLD)of target lesions at baseline; Progressive Disease (PD), \>=20% increase in the SLD of target lesions at baseline; Stable Disease (SD), Neither sufficient decrease in SLD to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase in SLD to qualify for PD.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy
n=33 Participants
Weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
|
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy in EGFR (+) Tumors
Percentage of response to weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy in patients with EGFR positive tumors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Objective Response of Tumor by RECIST 1.0 Criteria
partial response
|
10 participants
|
—
|
|
Objective Response of Tumor by RECIST 1.0 Criteria
stable disease
|
20 participants
|
—
|
|
Objective Response of Tumor by RECIST 1.0 Criteria
progressive disease
|
3 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were followed during treatment and for 30 days after completion of treatmentPopulation: All participants were evaluated for toxicity.
Adverse events assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy
n=37 Participants
Weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
|
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy in EGFR (+) Tumors
Percentage of response to weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy in patients with EGFR positive tumors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Assessed for Adverse Events
|
37 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month after completion of treatmentPopulation: Surviving participants who completed therapy and were determined to be resectable.
Tumor resectability is based on CT scan and as defined by the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Convened Consensus Conference on Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (Callery MP, et al. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:1727-1733): no evidence of superior mesenteric vein (SMV) or portal vein (PV)abutment, distortion, tumor thrombus, or venous encasement, and clear fat planes around celiac axis (CA), hepatic artery (HA), and superior mesenteric artery (SMA).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy
n=33 Participants
Weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
|
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy in EGFR (+) Tumors
Percentage of response to weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy in patients with EGFR positive tumors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Determined to be Resectable (Eligible for Surgery)After Completion of Therapy
|
26 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: One month post-therapyPopulation: All EGFR (-) subjects who completed therapy were evaluated.
Tumor was assessed for EGFR status by immunohistochemistry. EGFR positive and EGRF negative tumor types were evaluated and compared for response to treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy
n=9 Participants
Weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
|
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy in EGFR (+) Tumors
n=24 Participants
Percentage of response to weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy in patients with EGFR positive tumors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Role of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Status in Response to Treatment.
|
33 percent
|
29 percent
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Five years post treatmentPopulation: All evaluable participants who completed treatment, and had confirmed progression of disease.
Time to disease progression after therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy
n=28 Participants
Weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
|
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy in EGFR (+) Tumors
Percentage of response to weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy in patients with EGFR positive tumors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Disease-Free Survival After Therapy
|
9.1 months
Interval 2.0 to
Partipants did not all reach endpoint.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Five years post treatmentPopulation: All participants enrolled regardless of evaluability for primary outcome measure.
Length of survival after therapy in all participants enrolled.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy
n=37 Participants
Weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
|
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy in EGFR (+) Tumors
Percentage of response to weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy in patients with EGFR positive tumors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Length of Survival After Therapy
|
17.3 months
Interval 2.0 to
Not all participants evaluated reached end point.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Five years post treatmentPopulation: All participants who completed treatment and underwent resection
Local recurrence, distant recurrence, or both.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy
n=25 Participants
Weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy.
|
Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, Radiotherapy in EGFR (+) Tumors
Percentage of response to weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy in patients with EGFR positive tumors.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pattern of Failure After Therapy
number of participants with local recurrence only
|
2 participants
|
—
|
|
Pattern of Failure After Therapy
number of ppts. with local and distant recurrence
|
1 participants
|
—
|
|
Pattern of Failure After Therapy
number of ppts. with distant disease recurrence
|
17 participants
|
—
|
|
Pattern of Failure After Therapy
number of ppts. without recurrence or unknown
|
5 participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Cetuximab/Gemcitabine/Radiotherapy
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cetuximab/Gemcitabine/Radiotherapy
n=33 participants at risk
weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
CNS Ischemia
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2
|
|
Investigations
Anemia
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder - stent obstruction
|
24.2%
8/33 • Number of events 8
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 4
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis/GI Bleed
|
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 5
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hematoma subdural
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea/Vomiting
|
27.3%
9/33 • Number of events 16
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain - gouty arthritis
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
66.7%
22/33 • Number of events 34
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cetuximab/Gemcitabine/Radiotherapy
n=33 participants at risk
weekly cetuximab, twice-weekly gemcitabine and intensity modulated radiotherapy
|
|---|---|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylaxtic reaction to erbitux
|
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place