Repertaxin in Prevention of Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation
NCT ID: NCT00224406
Last Updated: 2024-12-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
114 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-05-01
2007-09-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The safety of repertaxin in the specific clinical setting was also evaluated.
The ability of repertaxin to reduce target cells (polymorphonuclear leukocyte \[PMN\]) infiltration into the graft was evaluated to confirm its mechanism of action.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A total of 100 patients accepted and listed for lung transplantation, who met all of the study inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria described in Sections 9.3.1 and 9.3.2 of this report, were planned to be enrolled in the study. These patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either repertaxin or placebo, by continuous intravenous infusion for a period of 48 hours to start approximately 2 hours before reperfusion of the (first) transplanted lung occurred.
The experimental treatment was additional to the standard treatment of lung transplant recipients.
An initial 'loading dose' of repertaxin of 4.488 mg/kg body weight/hour was to be administered over 30 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 2.772 mg/kg body weight/hour lasting 47.5 hours.
Placebo was to be volume matched saline. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours. Study medication was to be provided as clear glass class I ampoules, each containing 10 mL of the following products: repertaxin (33 mg/mL aqueous injectable solution) and placebo (9 mg/mL aqueous injectable solution of NaCl).
The double-blind was to be maintained for the main part of the study only, i.e. up to the Month 1 (at least 30 days post-transplant) follow-up visit of the last patient in. After database lock of Month 1 data the study proceeded in an open fashion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Repertaxin
Both repertaxin and placebo were aqueous solutions packaged into identical clear glass Type I ampoule single dose units. Each ampoule contained 10 mL of either repertaxin or placebo.The dosing solution for infusion was prepared aseptically at the designated Pharmacy within each center and dispensed as 12.65 mg/mL solution in appropriate size infusion bags. An initial 'loading dose' of Repertaxin of 4.488 mg/kg body weight/hour was administered over 30 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 2.772 mg/kg body weight/hour lasting 47.5 hours.The loading and maintenance doses were administered using the same dosing solution (Repertaxin 12.65 mg/ml), but with the pump rate altered to provide an infusion rate of approximately 0.35 mUkg/hour and 0.22 ml/kg/hour, respectively.
Repertaxin
An initial 'loading dose' of repertaxin was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The study medication was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours.
Placebo
Both repertaxin and placebo were aqueous solutions packaged into identical clear glass Type I ampoule single dose units. The dosing solution for infusion was prepared aseptically at the designated Pharmacy within each center and dispensed as 12.65 mg/mL solution in appropriate size infusion bags. ampoule contained 10 mL of either repertaxin or placebo. An initial 'loading dose' of 9 mg/ml sodium chloride (NaCl) solution was administered over 30 minutes, followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.
Placebo
An initial 'loading dose' of placebo was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The placebo was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repertaxin
An initial 'loading dose' of repertaxin was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The study medication was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours.
Placebo
An initial 'loading dose' of placebo was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The placebo was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ages 18 to 65 years;
* Body weight 30 to 95 kg (inclusive) (i.e. up to 95.99 kg);
* Planned isolated (single and bi-lateral) lung transplant from a non-living donor with brain death. This included lobar lung transplant involving excision and sizing of a cadaver donor lobe to meet the thoracic dimension of the recipient before being transplanted;
* Normal renal function at the time of transplant as per calculated creatinine clearance (Clcr) 60 mL/min. Creatinine clearance was calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula;
* Patient was willing and able to comply with the protocol procedures for the duration of the study, including scheduled follow-up visits and examinations;
* Patient gave written informed consent, prior to any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent could be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice to their future medical care.
Exclusion Criteria
* Recipients of a lung from a living lobar donor;
* Recipients of a lung from a non-heart beating donor;
* Re-do lung transplantation;
* Recipients requiring mechanical ventilation at the time of transplant;
* Recipients with an extra-respiratory tract site of infection (positive blood culture(s) and/or fever associated with other signs of systemic sepsis syndrome). The criterion was not meant to exclude bacteraemic cystic fibrosis patients with or without fever, unless they presented with other signs of sepsis;
* Recipients with hepatic dysfunction (bilirubin exceeding 3 mg/dL and/or transaminases \>3X upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) at the time of transplant;
* Hypersensitivity to:
* Ibuprofen or to more than one non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID);
* Medications belonging to the class of sulfonamides, such as sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfasalazine, nimesulide or celecoxib;
* Patients simultaneously participating in any other studies involving a study drug to be administered concomitantly with the investigational product and/or a study drug intended to prevent ischemia/reperfusion injury;
* Planned use of anli-CD3 monoclonal antibody (Orthoclone OKT3) or alemtuzumab (Campath) induction immunosuppression;
* Planned use of sirolimus in the first 3 months after transplantation;
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women (NB: pregnancy was lo be avoided in patients or partners during the first month of participation in the study; no other specific warnings were described, considering even stricter general recommendations concerning pregnancy in transplanted patients, the treatment course of the investigational product, its pharmacokinetic profile, and the lack of significant adverse effects on mating performance and fertility in animal studies).
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roberto Novellini, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of South California, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Colorado, Health Sciences Centre
Denver, Colorado, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REP0104
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id