Efficacy and Safety of Adding Clopidogrel to Aspirin or Use of Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction
NCT ID: NCT00222573
Last Updated: 2006-05-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
46000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1999-07-31
2005-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite considerable improvements in the emergency treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI), including the use of aspirin, early mortality and morbidity remain high. The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel adds to the benefit of aspirin in acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, but its effects on mortality and morbidity in patients with ST-elevation MI were unclear.
45,852 patients admitted to 1250 hospitals within 24 hours of the onset of suspected acute MI were randomly allocated to receive clopidogrel 75 mg daily or matching placebo (both in addition to aspirin 162 mg daily). 93% had ST-segment elevation or bundle branch block, and 7% had ST-segment depression. Treatment was to continue until discharge or up to a maximum of 4 weeks in hospital (mean 15 days in survivors), and 93% completed it. The two pre-specified co-primary outcomes were: (i) the composite of death, reinfarction or stroke; and (ii) death from any cause during the scheduled treatment period. Comparisons were between all clopidogrel-allocated and all placebo-allocated patients (ie, "intention-to-treat"), and used the log-rank method.
Allocation to clopidogrel produced a highly significant 9% (95% CI 3-14) proportional reduction in the primary composite outcome of death, reinfarction or stroke (2121 \[9.2%\] clopidogrel vs 2310 \[10.1%\] placebo; p=0.002), corresponding to 9 (SE 3) fewer events per 1000 patients treated for about 2 weeks. There was also a significant 7% (95% CI 1-13) proportional reduction in the co-primary outcome of any death (1726 \[7.5%\] vs 1845 \[8.1%\]; p=0.03). These effects on death, reinfarction and stroke appeared to be consistent across a wide range of patients and independent of other treatments being used. Considering all transfused, fatal or cerebral bleeds together, no significant excess risk was observed with clopidogrel, either overall (134 \[0.58%\] vs 125 \[0.55%\]; p=0.59), or among patients aged 70 years or older (50 \[0.84%\] vs 43 \[0.72%\]; p=0.48) or among those given fibrinolytic therapy (74 \[0.65%\] vs 72 \[0.63%\]; p=0.88).
In a wide range of patients with acute MI, adding clopidogrel 75 mg daily to aspirin and other standard treatments (such as fibrinolytic therapy) reduces mortality and major vascular events in hospital, without any material increase in major bleeding.
Metoprolol
Despite previous randomised trials of early beta-blocker therapy in the emergency treatment of suspected acute myocardial infarction (MI), substantial uncertainty has persisted about the value of adding it to currently standard interventions (eg, aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy), and the balance of potential benefits and hazards was unclear even in high-risk patients.
45852 patients admitted to 1250 hospitals within 24 hours of the onset of suspected acute MI were randomly allocated to receive metoprolol (up to 15 mg intravenous followed by 200 mg oral daily) or matching placebo. 93% had ST-segment elevation or bundle branch block, and 7% had ST-segment depression. Treatment was to continue until discharge or up to a maximum of 4 weeks in hospital (mean 15 days in survivors), and 89% completed it. The two pre-specified co-primary outcomes were: (i) the composite of death, reinfarction or cardiac arrest; and (ii) death from any cause during the scheduled treatment period. Comparisons were between all metoprolol-allocated and all placebo-allocated patients (ie, "intention-to-treat"), and used the log-rank method.
Neither of the co-primary outcomes was significantly reduced by allocation to metoprolol. For the primary composite outcome of death, reinfarction, or cardiac arrest, 2166 (9.4%) patients had at least one such event among the 22 929 allocated metoprolol compared with 2261 (9.9%) among the 22 923 allocated matching placebo (odds ratio \[OR\] 0.96 \[95% CI 0.90-1.01\]; p=0.1). For the co-primary outcome of death alone, there were 1774 (7.7%) in the metoprolol group versus 1797 (7.8%) in the placebo group (OR 0.99 \[0.92-1.05\]; p=0.69). Allocation to metoprolol was associated with 5 fewer people having reinfarction (464 \[2.0%\] metoprolol vs 568 \[2.5%\] placebo; OR 0.82 \[0.72-0.92\]; p=0.001) and 5 fewer having ventricular fibrillation (581 \[2.5%\] vs 698 \[3.0%\]; OR 0.83 \[0.75-0.93\]; p=0.001) per 1000 treated. Overall, these reductions were counter-balanced by 11 more per 1000 allocated metoprolol developing cardiogenic shock (1141 \[5.0%\] vs 885 \[3.9%\]; OR 1.30 \[1.19-1.41\]; p\<0.00001). The excess of cardiogenic shock was chiefly during days 0-1 after hospitalisation, whereas the reductions in reinfarction and ventricular fibrillation emerged more gradually. Consequently, the overall effect on death, reinfarction, arrest or shock was significantly adverse during days 0-1 and significantly beneficial thereafter. There was substantial net hazard among haemodynamically unstable patients and moderate net benefit among those who were relatively stable, particularly after days 0-1.
The use of early beta-blocker therapy in acute MI reduces the risks of reinfarction and ventricular fibrillation, but increases the risk of cardiogenic shock, especially during the first day or so after hospitalisation. Consequently, it may generally be prudent to consider starting beta-blocker therapy in hospital only when the haemodynamic condition following MI has stabilized (and then, based on previous evidence, to continue such therapy long-term following discharge).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
clopidogrel and metoprolol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
0 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sanofi
INDUSTRY
AstraZeneca
INDUSTRY
University of Oxford
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rory Collins, Msc
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Oxford
Lisheng Liu, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institute of cardiovascular diseases, Fuwai hospital, Chinese academy of medical sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute of Cadiovascular diseases, Fuwai hospital, Chinese academy of medical sciences
Beijing, , China
Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chen ZM, Pan HC, Chen YP, Peto R, Collins R, Jiang LX, Xie JX, Liu LS; COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group. Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Nov 5;366(9497):1622-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67661-1.
Hubner G, Golbik R, Meshalkina LE. A method for determination of transketolase activity based on the use of a pH indicator. Biochem Int. 1992 Mar;26(3):545-50.
Steingrimsson JA, Hanley DF, Rosenblum M. Improving precision by adjusting for prognostic baseline variables in randomized trials with binary outcomes, without regression model assumptions. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Mar;54:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.026. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, Xie JX, Pan HC, Peto R, Collins R, Liu LS; COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Nov 5;366(9497):1607-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67660-X.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
study website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H6RDCN0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
COMMIT-CCS2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id