Efficacy and Safety of Adding Clopidogrel to Aspirin or Use of Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction

NCT ID: NCT00222573

Last Updated: 2006-05-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

46000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1999-07-31

Study Completion Date

2005-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

COMMIT/CCS2 is a large randomised trial of the effects of clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin alone in acute heart disease. Patients presenting within 24 hours of the onset of suspected acute MI were potentially eligible provided they were thought to have ST elevation or other ischaemic ECG abnormality with no clear indication for, or contraindication to, trial treatment. All patients were to be given 162 mg ASA daily and, in addition, 75 mg clopidogrel daily or matching placebo for 4 weeks or until prior discharge or death. (Patients were also randomised separately in a 2 X 2 factorial design between metoprolol versus placebo.) The two main study endpoints are death and the composite outcome of death, non-fatal reinfarction or stroke during the scheduled treatment period in hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Clopidogrel

Despite considerable improvements in the emergency treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI), including the use of aspirin, early mortality and morbidity remain high. The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel adds to the benefit of aspirin in acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, but its effects on mortality and morbidity in patients with ST-elevation MI were unclear.

45,852 patients admitted to 1250 hospitals within 24 hours of the onset of suspected acute MI were randomly allocated to receive clopidogrel 75 mg daily or matching placebo (both in addition to aspirin 162 mg daily). 93% had ST-segment elevation or bundle branch block, and 7% had ST-segment depression. Treatment was to continue until discharge or up to a maximum of 4 weeks in hospital (mean 15 days in survivors), and 93% completed it. The two pre-specified co-primary outcomes were: (i) the composite of death, reinfarction or stroke; and (ii) death from any cause during the scheduled treatment period. Comparisons were between all clopidogrel-allocated and all placebo-allocated patients (ie, "intention-to-treat"), and used the log-rank method.

Allocation to clopidogrel produced a highly significant 9% (95% CI 3-14) proportional reduction in the primary composite outcome of death, reinfarction or stroke (2121 \[9.2%\] clopidogrel vs 2310 \[10.1%\] placebo; p=0.002), corresponding to 9 (SE 3) fewer events per 1000 patients treated for about 2 weeks. There was also a significant 7% (95% CI 1-13) proportional reduction in the co-primary outcome of any death (1726 \[7.5%\] vs 1845 \[8.1%\]; p=0.03). These effects on death, reinfarction and stroke appeared to be consistent across a wide range of patients and independent of other treatments being used. Considering all transfused, fatal or cerebral bleeds together, no significant excess risk was observed with clopidogrel, either overall (134 \[0.58%\] vs 125 \[0.55%\]; p=0.59), or among patients aged 70 years or older (50 \[0.84%\] vs 43 \[0.72%\]; p=0.48) or among those given fibrinolytic therapy (74 \[0.65%\] vs 72 \[0.63%\]; p=0.88).

In a wide range of patients with acute MI, adding clopidogrel 75 mg daily to aspirin and other standard treatments (such as fibrinolytic therapy) reduces mortality and major vascular events in hospital, without any material increase in major bleeding.

Metoprolol

Despite previous randomised trials of early beta-blocker therapy in the emergency treatment of suspected acute myocardial infarction (MI), substantial uncertainty has persisted about the value of adding it to currently standard interventions (eg, aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy), and the balance of potential benefits and hazards was unclear even in high-risk patients.

45852 patients admitted to 1250 hospitals within 24 hours of the onset of suspected acute MI were randomly allocated to receive metoprolol (up to 15 mg intravenous followed by 200 mg oral daily) or matching placebo. 93% had ST-segment elevation or bundle branch block, and 7% had ST-segment depression. Treatment was to continue until discharge or up to a maximum of 4 weeks in hospital (mean 15 days in survivors), and 89% completed it. The two pre-specified co-primary outcomes were: (i) the composite of death, reinfarction or cardiac arrest; and (ii) death from any cause during the scheduled treatment period. Comparisons were between all metoprolol-allocated and all placebo-allocated patients (ie, "intention-to-treat"), and used the log-rank method.

Neither of the co-primary outcomes was significantly reduced by allocation to metoprolol. For the primary composite outcome of death, reinfarction, or cardiac arrest, 2166 (9.4%) patients had at least one such event among the 22 929 allocated metoprolol compared with 2261 (9.9%) among the 22 923 allocated matching placebo (odds ratio \[OR\] 0.96 \[95% CI 0.90-1.01\]; p=0.1). For the co-primary outcome of death alone, there were 1774 (7.7%) in the metoprolol group versus 1797 (7.8%) in the placebo group (OR 0.99 \[0.92-1.05\]; p=0.69). Allocation to metoprolol was associated with 5 fewer people having reinfarction (464 \[2.0%\] metoprolol vs 568 \[2.5%\] placebo; OR 0.82 \[0.72-0.92\]; p=0.001) and 5 fewer having ventricular fibrillation (581 \[2.5%\] vs 698 \[3.0%\]; OR 0.83 \[0.75-0.93\]; p=0.001) per 1000 treated. Overall, these reductions were counter-balanced by 11 more per 1000 allocated metoprolol developing cardiogenic shock (1141 \[5.0%\] vs 885 \[3.9%\]; OR 1.30 \[1.19-1.41\]; p\<0.00001). The excess of cardiogenic shock was chiefly during days 0-1 after hospitalisation, whereas the reductions in reinfarction and ventricular fibrillation emerged more gradually. Consequently, the overall effect on death, reinfarction, arrest or shock was significantly adverse during days 0-1 and significantly beneficial thereafter. There was substantial net hazard among haemodynamically unstable patients and moderate net benefit among those who were relatively stable, particularly after days 0-1.

The use of early beta-blocker therapy in acute MI reduces the risks of reinfarction and ventricular fibrillation, but increases the risk of cardiogenic shock, especially during the first day or so after hospitalisation. Consequently, it may generally be prudent to consider starting beta-blocker therapy in hospital only when the haemodynamic condition following MI has stabilized (and then, based on previous evidence, to continue such therapy long-term following discharge).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

clopidogrel and metoprolol

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients presenting with ST elevation, left bundle branch block or ST depression within 24 hours of the onset of the symptoms of suspected acute MI

Exclusion Criteria

* clear indications for, or contraindications to, any of the study treatments
Minimum Eligible Age

0 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanofi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rory Collins, Msc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Oxford

Lisheng Liu, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Institute of cardiovascular diseases, Fuwai hospital, Chinese academy of medical sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institute of Cadiovascular diseases, Fuwai hospital, Chinese academy of medical sciences

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chen ZM, Pan HC, Chen YP, Peto R, Collins R, Jiang LX, Xie JX, Liu LS; COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group. Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Nov 5;366(9497):1622-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67661-1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16271643 (View on PubMed)

Hubner G, Golbik R, Meshalkina LE. A method for determination of transketolase activity based on the use of a pH indicator. Biochem Int. 1992 Mar;26(3):545-50.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 1627164 (View on PubMed)

Steingrimsson JA, Hanley DF, Rosenblum M. Improving precision by adjusting for prognostic baseline variables in randomized trials with binary outcomes, without regression model assumptions. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Mar;54:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.026. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28064029 (View on PubMed)

Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, Xie JX, Pan HC, Peto R, Collins R, Liu LS; COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Nov 5;366(9497):1607-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67660-X.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 16271642 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H6RDCN0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

COMMIT-CCS2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id