Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
990 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-03-31
2006-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Access for Cerebral Angiography in Adolescents
NCT04604340
Fluoroscopic-Guided Micropuncture Technique for Common Femoral Artery Access
NCT03955653
Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopically-guided Arterial Access in Non-cardiac Vascular Patients
NCT01612026
Isometric Preoperative Exercise on Autologous Arteriovenous Fistulas. Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03213756
Maximizing Native Arteriovenous Fistulae Rates.
NCT02705417
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Purpose: To establish the safety and efficacy of using fluoroscopic assistance to allow access of the common femoral artery rather than its branches and thus increase the ability to use closure devices.
Enrollment: An approximate enrollment of up to 1000 patients (all patients randomized) who will be undergoing cardiac catheterization and who meet all the eligibility criteria at OUMC and VAMC in Oklahoma City.
Duration: The study will be conducted over approximately one year.
Primary Endpoint: Prediction of ability to use femoral artery closure device based on angiographic data of the femoral artery from fluoroscopy arm versus traditional technique arm.
Secondary Endpoints:
1. Compare the incidence of known major side effects of femoral artery puncture between the two methods of access
2. Compare the time and number of attempts needed to obtain arterial access between the two groups of patients.
3. Compare the ability to puncture the common femoral artery using fluoroscopy vs. anatomical landmarks among different levels of trainees (cardiology fellows) and attending cardiologists.
4. Assess whether fluoroscopic guidance is a superior method to obtain access and thus should be used as a training technique for cardiology fellows.
Analytical Subset: Intention-to-treat sample
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Usual standard coronary angiographic procedure
Active Comparator
Standard coronary angiography technique; no fluoroscopic assistance
B
Fluoroscopy-guided coronary angiography
Fluoroscopy
Use of fluoroscopy during arterial insertion of coronary catheter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fluoroscopy
Use of fluoroscopy during arterial insertion of coronary catheter
Active Comparator
Standard coronary angiography technique; no fluoroscopic assistance
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients undergoing elective or urgent left heart cath from the femoral approach.
* Willingness to participate and sign the consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Creatinine \>= 3.0mg/dl.
* Graft in the common femoral artery or other surgeries at that site that might have changed the anatomy of the groin.
* Unable or refusal to sign a consent form.
* Patients from the Department of Corrections.
* Pregnant Women
* Undetectable femoral artery pulse.
* Patients undergoing emergent cardiac catheterization for ST elevation MI or unstable ACS.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Oklahoma
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas Hennebry, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oklahoma
Mazen S Abu-Fadel, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oklahoma
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Oklahoma Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, Zacharias SJ, Aston CE, Saucedo JF, Schechter E, Hennebry TA. Fluoroscopy vs. traditional guided femoral arterial access and the use of closure devices: a randomized controlled trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Oct 1;74(4):533-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22174.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11854
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.