PegIntron Versus IntronA in CMAJCC Stage II (EADO 2001/CMII Trial)
NCT ID: NCT00221702
Last Updated: 2010-10-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
898 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-06-30
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is an European multicenter, open label, prospective randomized phase III trial evaluating the efficacy of long-term maintenance therapy of two therapy options, IntronA for 18 months versus PegIntron for 36 months, administered in an adjuvant setting after the local excision of an intermediate risk cutaneous melanoma.
Eligibility criteria
Intermediate risk melanoma is defined by the following criteria: (1) a tumor thickness \>= 1,5mm and (2) the absence of regional nodal macrometastases, as assessed either by clinical examination or, if sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or elective node dissection (ELND) are performed, by the absence of macroscopic evidence of disease. Patients with evidence of nodal micrometastasis by SLNB or ELND are eligible. The choice of performing sentinel node dissection will be left to the decision of each center, on condition to concern all consecutive patients and that all surgical procedures are completed before randomization of the patients . The centers have to inform their respective national study center if they perform SLNB or ELND and also if they change their surgical procedure.
Study treatments
* Arm A : PegIntron 100 mcg SC/week for 36 months
* Arm B : IntronA 3miu TIWW SC for 18 months
Endpoints
The primary endpoint of the study will be the time to any recurrence (local recurrence, satellite or in transit metastasis, regional node metastasis or distant metastasis) or death, whatever the cause. The primary comparison between the two arms will use the 5-year disease-free survival time. Secondary endpoints are time to distant metastasis , overall survival, toxicity and quality of life.
Therapy with either PegIntron or IntronA will continue as scheduled unless there is evidence of disease progression (whether local or distant recurrence), severe toxicity, or the subject requests that therapy be discontinued. All patients will be followed for disease-free-survival and overall survival until the end of the trial.
Sample size and analysis
The calculated sample size is 1190 patients to be enrolled over a 5 years period; this sample size is inclusive of an expected lost to follow up not more than 10% during the course of the trial. The randomization procedure will be stratified according to centers and to sentinel node biopsy. The primary analysis will be performed under the intent to treat principle.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Peg Intron 100 mcg SC/week for 36 months
PegIntron
100 mcg SC/week for 36 months
B
Intron A 3 X 3 MIU, weekly, sc, for 18 months
intron A
3mui TIWW SC for 18 months
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PegIntron
100 mcg SC/week for 36 months
intron A
3mui TIWW SC for 18 months
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Tumour thickness \>= 1.5 mm (Breslow staging)
* Absence of clinically detectable regional node metastasis, no evidence of distant metastasis
* Informed consent form signed
Exclusion Criteria
* Macroscopic disease
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Schering-Plough
INDUSTRY
University Hospital, Bordeaux
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University Hospital Bordeaux
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean - Jacques GROB, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Marseille
Geneviève Chêne, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
APHM, dermatology
Marseille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Grob JJ, Jouary T, Dreno B, Asselineau J, Gutzmer R, Hauschild A, Leccia MT, Landthaler M, Garbe C, Sassolas B, Herbst RA, Guillot B, Chene G, Pehamberger H. Adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b (36 months) versus low-dose interferon alfa-2b (18 months) in melanoma patients without macrometastatic nodes: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 European Association for Dermato-Oncology (EADO) study. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jan;49(1):166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2001-034
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
9267-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id