PegIntron Versus IntronA in CMAJCC Stage II (EADO 2001/CMII Trial)

NCT ID: NCT00221702

Last Updated: 2010-10-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

898 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Melanoma with a tumor thickness \>= 1.5mm without clinically detectable nodes represents an increasing population with relapse rate of more than 50%. Adjuvant therapy with low doses of IFN alpha can provide a benefit in this group. However, the impact of low dose IFN alpha is not sustained after the treatment period. A longer treatment may prolong the benefit and thus have a more clear-cut impact on disease-free and overall survival. The tolerance and the impact on quality of life are limiting factors in a group of patients whose individual course is not necessarily poor. PegIntron may be better tolerated than instant release interferon, and thus make this treatment more acceptable in terms of toxicity and quality of life. Thus treatment schedule with PegIntron is not expected to increase the cost of standard care significantly.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study design and primary objective

This is an European multicenter, open label, prospective randomized phase III trial evaluating the efficacy of long-term maintenance therapy of two therapy options, IntronA for 18 months versus PegIntron for 36 months, administered in an adjuvant setting after the local excision of an intermediate risk cutaneous melanoma.

Eligibility criteria

Intermediate risk melanoma is defined by the following criteria: (1) a tumor thickness \>= 1,5mm and (2) the absence of regional nodal macrometastases, as assessed either by clinical examination or, if sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or elective node dissection (ELND) are performed, by the absence of macroscopic evidence of disease. Patients with evidence of nodal micrometastasis by SLNB or ELND are eligible. The choice of performing sentinel node dissection will be left to the decision of each center, on condition to concern all consecutive patients and that all surgical procedures are completed before randomization of the patients . The centers have to inform their respective national study center if they perform SLNB or ELND and also if they change their surgical procedure.

Study treatments

* Arm A : PegIntron 100 mcg SC/week for 36 months
* Arm B : IntronA 3miu TIWW SC for 18 months

Endpoints

The primary endpoint of the study will be the time to any recurrence (local recurrence, satellite or in transit metastasis, regional node metastasis or distant metastasis) or death, whatever the cause. The primary comparison between the two arms will use the 5-year disease-free survival time. Secondary endpoints are time to distant metastasis , overall survival, toxicity and quality of life.

Therapy with either PegIntron or IntronA will continue as scheduled unless there is evidence of disease progression (whether local or distant recurrence), severe toxicity, or the subject requests that therapy be discontinued. All patients will be followed for disease-free-survival and overall survival until the end of the trial.

Sample size and analysis

The calculated sample size is 1190 patients to be enrolled over a 5 years period; this sample size is inclusive of an expected lost to follow up not more than 10% during the course of the trial. The randomization procedure will be stratified according to centers and to sentinel node biopsy. The primary analysis will be performed under the intent to treat principle.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melanoma Neoplasm Metastasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Peg Intron 100 mcg SC/week for 36 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PegIntron

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mcg SC/week for 36 months

B

Intron A 3 X 3 MIU, weekly, sc, for 18 months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

intron A

Intervention Type DRUG

3mui TIWW SC for 18 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PegIntron

100 mcg SC/week for 36 months

Intervention Type DRUG

intron A

3mui TIWW SC for 18 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically proven cutaneous melanoma
* Tumour thickness \>= 1.5 mm (Breslow staging)
* Absence of clinically detectable regional node metastasis, no evidence of distant metastasis
* Informed consent form signed

Exclusion Criteria

* Any prior chemo-, immuno-, hormonal or radiation therapy
* Macroscopic disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Schering-Plough

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University Hospital Bordeaux

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean - Jacques GROB, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Marseille

Geneviève Chêne, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

APHM, dermatology

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grob JJ, Jouary T, Dreno B, Asselineau J, Gutzmer R, Hauschild A, Leccia MT, Landthaler M, Garbe C, Sassolas B, Herbst RA, Guillot B, Chene G, Pehamberger H. Adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon alfa-2b (36 months) versus low-dose interferon alfa-2b (18 months) in melanoma patients without macrometastatic nodes: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 European Association for Dermato-Oncology (EADO) study. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jan;49(1):166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22975216 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2001-034

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

9267-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id