Cystic Fibrosis Withdrawal of Inhaled Steroids Evaluation Study (CF WISE Study)
NCT ID: NCT00220259
Last Updated: 2005-11-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
240 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2001-05-31
2005-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Some patients are put on inhaled steroids because they are wheezy despite taking regular bronchodilators (inhaled medicines that help open up the airways eg Ventolin, Bricanyl). Occasionally young children are put on them when they wheeze with colds, and have simply remained on them ever since. However many CF patients have been put onto inhaled steroids because their doctors thought it might reduce the inflammation in the lungs and help improve lung function. This inflammation (which is swelling of the lining of the airways) is known to be important in CF and results from recurrent chest infections.
Although it is believed, in theory, that inhaled steroids should be useful for most CF patients, we are not sure how well they work in CF and it has not yet been possible to prove this with standard studies. This would normally involve starting inhaled steroids in patients who have not been taking them. We have therefore taken a different approach, namely to withdraw them from some patients who have been on them for a long time, to see if there is any effect of stopping them.
It is important that we answer this question, as we do not want CF patients taking medicines that may be unnecessary. CF patients already have to take many oral and inhaled medicines and if we can cut down this burden, it would be helpful for everyone. Of course, we may find that patients do need these medicines but at least we will then be certain that it is for a good reason.
The main hypothesis is that withdrawing inhaled steroids is not associated with an earlier onset of acute chest exacerbations.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aims: to test the feasibility and safety of withdrawal of ICS in CF by performing a study of randomised placebo-controlled withdrawal of ICS in children and adults already taking them. The results will be used to determine the feasibility of a future prospective study to prove whether starting ICS in CF patients not already on them, and those successfully withdrawn, leads to benefit (in lung function and chest exacerbations) and/or harm, compared to placebo.
Methods: We will study 240 children and adults in 12 centres. We have matching placebo and Flixotide metered dose inhalers to be used through a Volumatic, so any subjects currently on Pulmicort or Becotide will switch to Flixotide 2 months during the run-in phase, and all subjects will use their ICS through a spacer device. Patients will be randomised to continue on ICS or take placebo for 6 months, in a double-blind fashion. Primary outcome is time to 1st exacerbation; secondary ones are decline in lung function, new courses of antibiotics and rescue bronchodilator usage.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fluticasone or placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
.Patients whose parents or legal guardians are willing to give written informed consent for their child to participate in the study. The investigators will also obtain consent from the child whenever possible.
.Patients who are likely to cooperate with taking the study medication and attend the clinic at appointed times.
Exclusion Criteria
* Cases in which the clinician feels unhappy about stopping ICS due to severe lung disease or concomitant "asthma" (see below).
* Course of intravenous antibiotics (IVABs) within last month.
* Taking part in another drug trial within last 2 months. .Use of high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (greater than or equal to 2000mcg/d fluticasone for 17 years or over and greater than or equal to 1000mcg/d fluticasone if less than 17 years.
* Patients with any medical or psychological condition, which in the opinion of the investigators precludes their entry into the study.
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cystic Fibrosis Trust
OTHER
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ian M Balfour Lynn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Brompton Hospital
London, London, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Cystic Fibrosis Trust
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PJ498
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
01PRT/31
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id