Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Simdax® Versus Dobutrex® in Decompensated Heart Failure Patients.
NCT ID: NCT00219388
Last Updated: 2017-03-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-11-30
2005-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Levosimendan Versus Dobutamine for Renal Function in Heart Failure
NCT02133105
Peroral Levosimendan in Chronic Heart Failure
NCT00130884
Survival of Patients With Acute Heart Failure in Need of Intravenous Inotropic Support: a Multicentre, Parallel-Group, Randomised, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study of Levosimendan Versus Dobutamine in Patients With Acute Heart Failure.
NCT00348504
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Short-term Administration of SIMDAX
NCT03555123
Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Infusions of Levosimendan in Outpatients With Advanced Heart Failure
NCT01065194
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients will receive infusions in parallell, one of the groups will receive active product (levosimendan or dobutamine) and the other will receive placebo (double-dummy technique).
Catheterisation for measurement of hemodynamic parameters will be performed according to routine methods at the clinic. The measurements of the hemodynamic variables will start 30 minutes before start of study drug infusion and will be finished 48 hours after start of infusion. The most important variables during the measurements is Cardiac Index (CI)and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP).
Parallel registration will be done on ECG, blood pressure, blood frequency, central venous pressure, and lung artery pressure. Heart failure and other clinical symptoms will be registered continuously during 48 hours. Blood samples will be taken intermittent to record the blood values. Cogent rules for decreasing/increasing of the dose can be found in the study protocol, likewise rules for interruption or stoop for infusion.
Registration of side-effects will be done continuously. The recommendation for treatment for known side effects could be found in the protocol (section 5.3.4) and the protocol should be available during the study procedure.
One month after the study the patients will be followed up with a very careful examination and also of the amount of visits and reason for visits to hospital during the past 30-35 days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Levosimendan
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ongoing treatment with a beta-receptor blocking agent in a stable regimen for at least 3 months and at an optimal dose as per the investigator's judgment.
* Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) less than or similar to 35%.
* CI \< 2.5 l/min/m2.
* Mean PCWP \>15 mmHg.
Exclusion Criteria
* Systolic blood pressure 85 mmHg or less at screening and/or baseline.
* Heart rate 130 bpm or greater, persistent for at least 5 minutes at screening and/or baseline.
* Severe angina pectoris during the 6 hours before screening and/or baseline.
* Deterioration of chronic heart failure due to an acute myocardial infarction within 5 days before screening measurements.
* Administration of Simdax within 1 month before baseline.
* A history of Torsades de Pointes.
* Evidence of severe renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 450 μmol/l or on dialysis) at screening.
* Significant hepatic impairment or elevation of liver enzymes to 5 times the upper limit of normal range of the analysing laboratory at screening.
* Acute bleeding or severe anaemia.
* Heart surgery within 3 months before baseline.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claes-Håkan Bergh, Assoc Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institution of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cardiology Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Follath F, Cleland JG, Just H, Papp JG, Scholz H, Peuhkurinen K, Harjola VP, Mitrovic V, Abdalla M, Sandell EP, Lehtonen L; Steering Committee and Investigators of the Levosimendan Infusion versus Dobutamine (LIDO) Study. Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2002 Jul 20;360(9328):196-202. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09455-2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Sponsor: Orion Pharma
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
3001075
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.