Trial Outcomes & Findings for Use of the Paradigm 722 System to Improve Glycemic Control in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes (NCT NCT00211510)
NCT ID: NCT00211510
Last Updated: 2017-06-12
Results Overview
Change is defined as A1c at Week 26 minus A1c at Baseline in each study arm. The difference between the change in each group will then be analyzed. A1c measure is defined as the percent of glycated hemoglobin using one standardized assay for all subjects.
COMPLETED
NA
146 participants
Baseline and 26 weeks
2017-06-12
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
subjects with use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
72
|
74
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
66
|
72
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
subjects with use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Use of the Paradigm 722 System to Improve Glycemic Control in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
n=72 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
n=74 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
Total
n=146 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6 • n=5 Participants
|
32.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 • n=7 Participants
|
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
72 participants
n=5 Participants
|
74 participants
n=7 Participants
|
146 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeksChange is defined as A1c at Week 26 minus A1c at Baseline in each study arm. The difference between the change in each group will then be analyzed. A1c measure is defined as the percent of glycated hemoglobin using one standardized assay for all subjects.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
n=72 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
n=74 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in A1c From Baseline to 26 Weeks
|
-0.72 Percent glycated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
-0.58 Percent glycated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeksSevere Hypoglycemia as defined by hypoglycemic events requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrates, glucagon or other resuscitative actions, as reported by subject. The frequency evaluates the total number of events. This will be analyzed and compared between the two study arms from baseline to week 26.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
n=72 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
n=74 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Frequency of Severe Hypoglycemia From Baseline to Week 26
|
11 hypoglycemic events
|
3 hypoglycemic events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeksHypoglycemia is defined as a recorded blood glucose event \<70mg/dL. The amount of time spent below this parameter will be analyzed and compared between groups from Baseline to Week 26
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
n=72 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
n=74 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 26
|
-0.07 mmol/dl*min
Standard Deviation 0.581
|
0.281 mmol/dl*min
Standard Deviation 1.023
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeksHyperglycemia is defined as a recorded blood glucose event \> 180 mg/dL. The amount of time spent above this parameter will be analyzed and compared between groups from Baseline to Week 26
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
n=72 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
n=74 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 26
|
-10.2 mmol/dl*min
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
-9.2 mmol/dl*min
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeksPercent comparative sensor glucose reading to blood glucose meter in agreement within +/- 20% (Clark Error Grid zone A + zone B).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
n=72 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
n=74 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Glucose Sensor Accuracy as Measured in the 722 Group
|
95.9 percent of agreement
|
NA percent of agreement
Subjects in the Paradigm 715 arm did not wear the sensor and so no sensor accuracy could be tested.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeksQuestionnaire evaluating subjects'potential fear of hypoglycemia events. Change assessed at Baseline and Week 26 and compared between groups. Likert scale scored with 4 being the worst and 0 being no problem.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
n=72 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
n=74 Participants
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Questionnaire Assessed and Compared Between Groups
|
-0.07 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
-0.22 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
Adverse Events
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
n=72 participants at risk
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
n=74 participants at risk
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Endocrine disorders
Severe Hypoglycemia
|
13.9%
10/72 • Number of events 15 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
4.1%
3/74 • Number of events 6 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Diabetic Ketoacidosis
|
4.2%
3/72 • Number of events 3 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin abscess
|
1.4%
1/72 • Number of events 2 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment
|
0.00%
0/72 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
|
Immune system disorders
anaphylactic reaction
|
0.00%
0/72 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
scoliosis
|
0.00%
0/72 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Puncture wound
|
0.00%
0/72 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
n=72 participants at risk
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
|
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
n=74 participants at risk
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
|
6.9%
5/72 • Number of events 8 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
4.1%
3/74 • Number of events 7 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Irritation
|
18.1%
13/72 • Number of events 15 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
5.4%
4/74 • Number of events 5 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
5.6%
4/72 • Number of events 4 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
4.2%
3/72 • Number of events 4 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
0.00%
0/74 • Severe adverse event data and adverse device effects were collected for the six month study phase and six month continuation phase that followed.
Some hypoglycemia events were self reported and unable to be independently evaluated or verified by the PI, while others had supporting clinical data. Those with supporting data are reported as Systematic, while the self reported events are reported as Non-systematic.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60