Community Interventions in Non-medical Settings to Increase Informed Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening
NCT ID: NCT00207636
Last Updated: 2025-01-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
812 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-12-31
2009-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial of Community Health Worker-led Decision Coaching
NCT03726320
Improving Health Literacy in African-American Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT03322891
A Youth-led Intervention to Reduce Healthcare Disparities in Cancer Screening
NCT07008781
A Sustainable Approach to Increasing Cancer Screening
NCT01395459
Implementing Personal Health Records to Promote Evidence-Based Cancer Screening
NCT02138448
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, we propose to: (1) develop an interactive computer-based decision aid (DA) to promote IDM for CaP screening; and (2) conduct a randomized controlled worksite trial to evaluate the impact the DA intervention on employed men's ability to make informed decisions regarding CaP. This work is designed to be responsive to recent calls for IDM interventions in community settings among diverse populations. If successful, our findings could validate the effectiveness of DAs to promote IDM for CaP and serve as a model for widespread dissemination, thus improving quality of care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Distribution of printed materials
No interventions assigned to this group
Computer Assisted Decision making tool
The intervention consisted of access to a computer tailored decision aid designed to promote informed decision making.
Computer Assisted Decision making tool
The intervention consisted of access to a computer tailored decision aid designed to promote informed decision making.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Computer Assisted Decision making tool
The intervention consisted of access to a computer tailored decision aid designed to promote informed decision making.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-English speaking workers
* Temporary or contract workers
45 Years
65 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
OTHER
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer D Allen, PN MPH ScD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard School of Public Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Allen JD, Othus MK, Hart A Jr, Tom L, Li Y, Berry D, Bowen D. A randomized trial of a computer-tailored decision aid to improve prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the Take the Wheel trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Sep;19(9):2172-86. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0410. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDC-NCCDPHP-2504
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
NCT00137618
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: nct_alias
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.