Use of Risperidone in ECT for Treatment Resistant Depression
NCT ID: NCT00203723
Last Updated: 2006-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-03-31
2006-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Compared to patients who are not medication resistant, who generally retain the highest likelihood of response to ECT alone, patients with TRD have a lower response rate to ECT with average estimates of response to ECT alone between 50-60% (APA 2001 ECT Task Force). Additionally, while ECT for most patients may provide acute remission, those patients with TRD remain at high risk for rapid relapse (Sackeim 2001, Petrides 2001, Sackeim 1990, Aronson 1987). Consequently, ECT alone may be insufficient to achieve remission or to prevent relapse. Interestingly, resistance to some types of medication was found also to predict resistance to ECT alone, i.e., resistance to tricyclic antidepressants correlated with a less likely response to ECT, though the same prediction did not hold for serotonin reuptake inhibitors (Prudic 1996, Prudic 1990).
In general, for some patients with TRD, studies support the use of combined medication approaches, and specifically, have demonstrated the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of an antidepressant with an antipsychotic medication, though usually for patients with comorbid psychosis (Wheeler 2000, Shelton 1999, Barak 1999). Case reports exist in the ECT literature about the safety and tolerability of ECT and antipsychotics, and improved efficacy, albeit generally for patients with psychotic depression or other treatment resistant psychoses (Kupchik 2000, Bhatia 1998, Ranjan 1996, Farah, Beale, and Kellner 1995, Minter 1979). However, no studies systematically, or prospectively, investigate whether the specific combination of ECT plus an atypical antipsychotic offers a true treatment alternative to improved efficacy of ECT for patients with TRD.
This study reviews the experience and outcome of combining ECT and an atypical antipsychotic medication, risperidone, for TRD in various populations in an academic, university-based setting, and furthermore, explores in a pilot randomized open-label study whether ECT plus risperidone bears closer scrutiny in more rigorous study designs as a novel treatment approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Risperidone
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female
* Inpatient or outpatient ECT with a current diagnosis of unipolar or bipolar depression, with or without psychosis, according to DSM-IV criteria. HAM-D (17-item) score \> 17 and MADRS score \> 18 at screening and at first treatment session.
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to consent to ECT
* Current diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
* Current diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease or any Dementia, including Lewy Body Disease
* History of allergic reaction to risperidone
* History of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
* Current pregnancy or positive urine pregnancy test
* Women who are breast-feeding
* Active alcohol or illicit substance abuse
18 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Janssen, LP
INDUSTRY
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Randall Espinoza, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Los Angeles
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCLA Npi&H
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RIS-DEP-405
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UCLA IRB #03-10-049-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id