A Study to Evaluate the Tolerability, Safety and Effectiveness of Edratide in the Treatment of Lupus
NCT ID: NCT00203151
Last Updated: 2011-04-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
340 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-07-31
2007-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Epratuzumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
NCT00383214
Study of Epratuzumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
NCT00383513
Study of Epratuzumab in Serologically-positive Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Patients With Active Disease
NCT00624351
Pharmacokinetics Study of Epratuzumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
NCT00113971
A Phase 2a, Efficacy and Safety Study of Ustekinumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
NCT02349061
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
edratide
0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.5 mg injection once weekly
2
edratide
0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.5 mg injection once weekly
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
edratide
0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.5 mg injection once weekly
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Between the ages of 18 and 65 years (inclusive)
3. Fulfilled at least 4 ACR classification criteria
4. SLE patients with moderate, active disease
5. Subjects on stable dose of SLE medications for at least 4 weeks before randomization.
6. Women of child-bearing potential must practice a medically acceptable method of contraception..
7. Must understand the requirements of the study and agree to comply with the study protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects having a history of chronic infection
3. Subjects with a history of immunodeficiency syndrome or malignancy,
4. Subjects who received any investigational medication (including DHEA) within 3 months prior to randomization,
5. Subjects treated with any cytotoxic agents in the 3 months prior to randomization.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Teva Neuroscience
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dan Goldsatub, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Urowitz MB, Isenberg DA, Wallace DJ. Safety and efficacy of hCDR1 (Edratide) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of phase II study. Lupus Sci Med. 2015 Aug 11;2(1):e000104. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2015-000104. eCollection 2015.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TV-4710/201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.