Haemochromatosis:Phlebotomy Versus Erythrocytapheresis Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00202436

Last Updated: 2009-10-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this project we plan to evaluate the effectiveness of erythrocytapheresis against phlebotomy, both regarding the impact on the reduction in iron overload as well as reduction in patient "burden". Aspects of cost effectiveness will be included in the final analysis. Results of the study would allow decision-making based on Evidence Based Medicine on the "best" therapeutic options available for newly-diagnosed as well as existing primary hemochromatosis patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this project we plan to evaluate the effectiveness of erythrocytapheresis against phlebotomy, both regarding the impact on the reduction in iron overload as well as reduction in patient "burden". Aspects of cost effectiveness will be included in the final analysis. The results of the study would allow decision-making based on Evidence Based Medicine on the "best" therapeutic options available for newly-diagnosed as well as existing primary hemochromatosis patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemochromatosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Phlebotomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Phlebotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Removal of 500 ml whole blood

Erythrocytapheresis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

machinal removal of erythrocytes

2

Erythrocytapheresis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Phlebotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Removal of 500 ml whole blood

Erythrocytapheresis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

machinal removal of erythrocytes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Phlebotomy

Removal of 500 ml whole blood

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Erythrocytapheresis

machinal removal of erythrocytes

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bloodletting Therapeutic erythrocytapheresis

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hereditary haemochromatosis patients

Exclusion Criteria

* Malignancies, severe arrhythmias, congestive heart failure and/or recent angina, severe liver disease, epileptic seizures preceding in last 3 months before planned treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Atrium Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sanquin Research & Blood Bank Divisions

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sanquin Blood Bank South-east

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eva Rombout, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sanquin Research and Blood Bank Divisions

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sanquin Blood Bank Southeast Region

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rombout-Sestrienkova E, Winkens B, van Kraaij M, van Deursen CTBM, Janssen MCH, Rennings AMJ, Evers D, Kerkhoffs JL, Masclee A, Koek GH. A predictive model for estimating the number of erythrocytapheresis or phlebotomy treatments for patients with naive hereditary hemochromatosis. J Clin Apher. 2021 Jun;36(3):340-347. doi: 10.1002/jca.21867. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33368569 (View on PubMed)

Rombout-Sestrienkova E, Nieman FH, Essers BA, van Noord PA, Janssen MC, van Deursen CT, Bos LP, Rombout F, van den Braak R, de Leeuw PW, Koek GH. Erythrocytapheresis versus phlebotomy in the initial treatment of HFE hemochromatosis patients: results from a randomized trial. Transfusion. 2012 Mar;52(3):470-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03292.x. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21848963 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PPO-C- 03-006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.