Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
670 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-30
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient-Physician Partnership to Improve High Blood Pressure Adherence
NCT00123045
Individually Tailored Web-Based Program to Improve Blood Pressure Control
NCT00377208
Motivational Interviewing
NCT00208104
Behavioral Study to Control Blood Pressure
NCT01035554
Interventions to Improve Hypertension Control and Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk
NCT00201136
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A large amount of literature suggests that the majority of "uncontrolled" hypertensives are under medical care, and that lack of control is largely explained by physicians not intensifying treatment to achieve the BP targets recommended in the national guidelines. Traditional physician education, feedback, and reminders have a limited effect in promoting a rapid rate of guideline implementation. The theoretical framework of diffusion of innovations suggests that providing physicians with tools to reduce uncertainty about the attributes of a guideline may accelerate the adoption process. The presumed barriers to treatment intensification for uncontrolled hypertension are: 1) uncertainty over the patient's "true" BP; 2) uncertainty over whether the patient is adherent to medications already prescribed; and 3) uncertainty over the benefits of adding medications when patients express preference for lifestyle modification.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
This cluster randomized trial in 10 primary care clinics (5 intervention and 5 control) will test the hypothesis that an intervention based on diffusion of innovations theory, and targeting provider treatment actions, will increase the prevalence of BP control to Joint National Committee-7(JNC-7) recommended levels in African American patients (greater than 140/90 mm Hg or greater 130/80 mm Hg if the patient has diabetes). The uncertainty reduction tools in the "Uncertainty Reduction to Accelerate Diffusion (URAD)" practices will include: 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, electronic bottle-cap monitoring of medication adherence, and medication and lifestyle counseling. The "Usual Practice (UP)" physicians will receive education about the guidelines and a "placebo" chart form indicating the patient is being followed in a BP control study. The 10 participating clinics represent a large, multi-site private group practice and a public health care system. Sixty-seven patients per clinic (670 total) will be enrolled when the intervention is initiated, and their BP and self-reported medication and lifestyle adherence will be monitored for two years. Sixty percent of the sample will be African American, and the study will have 90% power to detect a difference of 20% in the prevalence of hypertension control in the African Americans as a result of the intervention (50% control in URAD clinics vs. 30% control UP clinics). Secondary endpoints will include BP measurements by study staff under standardized conditions, physician treatment intensification actions, patient adherence, characteristics of doctor-patient communication associated with treatment action, use of the URAD components, and physician knowledge and beliefs about the JNC 7 guidelines and their relationship to BP control. Analysis of secondary endpoints will include race. The research team has collaborated with both health systems in previous studies, and is experienced in conducting hypertension control and behavioral intervention studies in the target population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Uncertainty reduction tools, at physician discretion, 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring and/or electronic bottle cap monitoring and/or lifestyle counseling
Uncertainty reduction
At physician discretion, 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring and/or electronic bottle cap monitoring and/or lifestyle counseling
2
Usual primary care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Uncertainty reduction
At physician discretion, 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring and/or electronic bottle cap monitoring and/or lifestyle counseling
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Had one previous visit to the setting within the past year and identified the setting as his/her usual source of care
* Average clinic BP on index visit and one most recent previous visit was equal to or greater than 140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic (130/80 mm Hg if diabetic)
* Acknowledges understanding of the study goals and methods and gives informed consent to participate in study measurements and other procedures
Exclusion Criteria
* Renal insufficiencies or renal failure based on a recent serum creatinine greater than 2.0 or chart diagnosis
* Planning to leave the Houston area within the next two years
* Severe, life-threatening illness that makes hypertension treatment a secondary priority
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
OTHER
Kelsey Research Foundation
OTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Hyman
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David J. Hyman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor College of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pavlik VN, Greisinger AJ, Pool J, Haidet P, Hyman DJ. Does reducing physician uncertainty improve hypertension control?: rationale and methods. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 May;2(3):257-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.849984.
Grigoryan L, Pavlik VN, Hyman DJ. Characteristics, drug combinations and dosages of primary care patients with uncontrolled ambulatory blood pressure and high medication adherence. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2013 Nov-Dec;7(6):471-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
Grigoryan L, Pavlik VN, Hyman DJ. Predictors of antihypertensive medication adherence in two urban health-care systems. Am J Hypertens. 2012 Jul;25(7):735-8. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2012.30. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
Hyman DJ, Pavlik VN, Greisinger AJ, Chan W, Bayona J, Mansyur C, Simms V, Pool J. Effect of a physician uncertainty reduction intervention on blood pressure in uncontrolled hypertensives--a cluster randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Apr;27(4):413-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1888-1. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
276
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.