Trial Outcomes & Findings for Treatment of Patients With Advanced Renal Cancer With a Radiolabeled Antibody, Yttrium-90 Conjugated Chimeric G250 (NCT NCT00199875)
NCT ID: NCT00199875
Last Updated: 2022-10-10
Results Overview
Toxicity was graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 3.0. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through the study period. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as follows for the purposes of dose escalation: Grade 4 hematopoietic toxicity in excess of 5 days or Grade 3 or greater nonhematopoietic toxicity.
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
PHASE1
Target enrollment
18 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
Continuously for up to 5 months
Results posted on
2022-10-10
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1 (0.2 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.2 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 2 (0.3 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.3 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 3 (0.4 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.4 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 4 (0.45 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.45 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 5 (0.55 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.55 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort 1 (0.2 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.2 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 2 (0.3 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.3 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 3 (0.4 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.4 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 4 (0.45 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.45 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 5 (0.55 mCi/kg)
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.55 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Treatment of Patients With Advanced Renal Cancer With a Radiolabeled Antibody, Yttrium-90 Conjugated Chimeric G250
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1 (0.2 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.2 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 2 (0.3 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.3 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 3 (0.4 mCi/kg)
n=6 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.4 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 4 (0.45 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.45 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 5 (0.55 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.55 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Total
n=18 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=5 Participants
|
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=7 Participants
|
62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=5 Participants
|
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=4 Participants
|
63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=21 Participants
|
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Karnofsky Performance Status
70
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Karnofsky Performance Status
80
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Karnofsky Performance Status
90
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Karnofsky Performance Status
100
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Karnofsky Performance Status
Missing
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Continuously for up to 5 monthsPopulation: The Safety Analysis Set includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Toxicity was graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 3.0. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through the study period. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as follows for the purposes of dose escalation: Grade 4 hematopoietic toxicity in excess of 5 days or Grade 3 or greater nonhematopoietic toxicity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1 (0.2 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.2 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 2 (0.3 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.3 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 3 (0.4 mCi/kg)
n=6 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.4 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 4 (0.45 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.45 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 5 (0.55 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.55 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
TEAE Meeting DLT Criteria
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Any TEAE
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Maximum grade 1 TEAE
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Maximum grade 2 TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Maximum grade 3 TEAE
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Maximum grade 4 TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Treatment-related TEAE
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Serious TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
TEAE Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 5 monthsPopulation: The Safety Analysis Set includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
In order to receive the therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 injection on Day 8, 9, or 10, patients must have demonstrated tumor targeting to lesions \> 2 cm detected by CT scan and must not have exhibited the following characteristics following the nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250: excessive liver and/or spleen uptake; excessive uptake in the normal kidney; non-visualization of the cardiac blood pool in the first imaging set; whole body clearance half-life (t1/2) \< 1.5 days; serum t1/2 \< 2 days; rapid clearance of the radiopharmaceutical from the blood pool with prominent marrow uptake on the first image.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1 (0.2 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.2 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 2 (0.3 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.3 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 3 (0.4 mCi/kg)
n=6 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.4 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 4 (0.45 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.45 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 5 (0.55 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.55 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Who Met Protocol-Specified Criteria to Receive ^90-Y-DOTA-cG250 Following ^111In-DOTA-cG250 Administration
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 6 monthsPopulation: The Safety Analysis Set includes all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were drawn for evaluation of the human antichimeric antibody (HACA) at screening, between Days 22 and 28, between Days 36 and 42, between Days 43 and 57 or at the end of study, and during long-term follow-up (approximately 12 weeks later). Serial dilutions were tested by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the "double antibody sandwich" technique and pretreatment serum as negative control.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1 (0.2 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.2 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 2 (0.3 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.3 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 3 (0.4 mCi/kg)
n=6 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.4 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 4 (0.45 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.45 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 5 (0.55 mCi/kg)
n=3 Participants
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.55 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With Samples Collected for Evaluation of Human Antichimeric Antibody
Baseline
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Samples Collected for Evaluation of Human Antichimeric Antibody
Day 28
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Samples Collected for Evaluation of Human Antichimeric Antibody
Day 42
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Samples Collected for Evaluation of Human Antichimeric Antibody
Day 63
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients With Samples Collected for Evaluation of Human Antichimeric Antibody
Long-term Follow-up
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Cohort 1 (0.2 mCi/kg)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Cohort 2 (0.3 mCi/kg)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Cohort 3 (0.4 mCi/kg)
Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Cohort 4 (0.45 mCi/kg)
Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Cohort 5 (0.55 mCi/kg)
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1 (0.2 mCi/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.2 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 2 (0.3 mCi/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.3 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 3 (0.4 mCi/kg)
n=6 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.4 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 4 (0.45 mCi/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.45 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 5 (0.55 mCi/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.55 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory tract haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1 (0.2 mCi/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.2 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 2 (0.3 mCi/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.3 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 3 (0.4 mCi/kg)
n=6 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.4 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 4 (0.45 mCi/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.45 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
Cohort 5 (0.55 mCi/kg)
n=3 participants at risk
Patients initially received a nontherapeutic injection of \^111In-DOTA-cG250 (5 mCi \^111In + 10 mg cG250) on Day 1. Pending satisfaction of protocol-specified lesion targeting criteria, a single dose of therapeutic \^90Y-DOTA-cG250 (0.55 mCi/kg \^90Y + 10 mg cG250) was administered on Day 8, 9, or 10 as a continuous IV infusion over approximately 5 to 15 minutes.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
50.0%
3/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
83.3%
5/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
International normalised ratio
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
83.3%
5/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
83.3%
5/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Prothrombin time
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
50.0%
3/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
50.0%
3/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
6/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
2/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
2/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
2/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysarthria
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Increased upper airway secretion
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All adverse events (AEs) occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 5 months.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using the NCI CTC (version 3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per patient at the maximum reported grade.
|
Additional Information
Jonathan Skipper PhD
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Phone: (212) 450-1539
Email: [email protected]
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60