Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-27
2007-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
NY-ESO-1 Protein With Montanide and CpG 7909 as Cancer Vaccine in Several Tumors
NCT00299728
NY-ESO-1-Specific T-cells in Treating Patients With Advanced NY-ESO-1-Expressing Sarcomas Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy
NCT02319824
Gene and Vaccine Therapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Malignancies
NCT01697527
Gene-Modified T Cells, Vaccine Therapy, and Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Stage IV or Locally Advanced Solid Tumors Expressing NY-ESO-1
NCT02775292
A Vaccine Study for High Risk Cancers
NCT00944580
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Blood samples were to be obtained at baseline, 2 weeks after each vaccination, prior to the second and third vaccination, and 4 weeks after the third vaccination for the assessment of clinical hematology, biochemistry measurements and immunology responses. Patients were to be evaluated for toxicity throughout the study.
Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) testing was to be performed at baseline and at the 2-week visit following the first and third vaccinations.
NY-ESO-1 and/or LAGE-1 specific antibodies were to be assessed in all patients by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). NY-ESO-1 specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were to be assessed in all patients by tetramer and/or ELISPOT assays.
Disease status was to be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks after the third vaccination in patients with measurable disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort 1
4 µg NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine was administered by particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED) at a pressure of 500 psi using the XR-1 Powderject® delivery device. The 4 µg dosage of NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine was administered as 4 X 1 µg PMEDs in close proximity.
The vaccine was administered in weeks 1, 5, and 9 of Cycle 1. In the absence of \> Grade 3 toxicity and in the absence of progressive disease requiring other treatment or the presence of NY-ESO-1 immunity, patients could receive an additional cycle of vaccinations of NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine.
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA Cancer Vaccine
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA Cancer Vaccine administered by particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED) at a pressure of 500 psi using the XR-1 Powderject® delivery device.
Cohort 2
8 µg NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine was administered by particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED) at a pressure of 500 psi using the XR-1 Powderject® delivery device.
The 8 µg dosage of NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine was administered as 8 X 1 µg PMEDs.
The vaccine was administered in weeks 1, 5, and 9 of Cycle 1. In the absence of \> Grade 3 toxicity and in the absence of progressive disease requiring other treatment or the presence of NY-ESO-1 immunity, patients could receive an additional cycle of vaccinations of NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine.
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA Cancer Vaccine
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA Cancer Vaccine administered by particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED) at a pressure of 500 psi using the XR-1 Powderject® delivery device.
Cohort 3
8 µg NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine was administered by particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED) at a pressure of 500 psi using the XR-1 Powderject® delivery device.
The 8 µg dosage of NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine was administered as a cluster dosage of 4 doses (day 1, 3, 5, 8) as 2 X 1 µg PMEDs per day.
The vaccine was administered in weeks 1, 5, and 9 of Cycle 1. In the absence of \> grade 3 toxicity and in the absence of progressive disease requiring other treatment or the presence of NY-ESO-1 immunity, patients could receive an additional cycle of vaccinations of NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA (pPJV7611) Cancer Vaccine.
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA Cancer Vaccine
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA Cancer Vaccine administered by particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED) at a pressure of 500 psi using the XR-1 Powderject® delivery device.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA Cancer Vaccine
NY-ESO-1 Plasmid DNA Cancer Vaccine administered by particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED) at a pressure of 500 psi using the XR-1 Powderject® delivery device.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Histologically proven tumor type known to express NY-ESO-1 or LAGE-1 (prostate cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, hepatocellular cancer, synovial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, head and neck, lung cancer, esophageal, ovarian, neuroblastoma); or NY-ESO-1 or LAGE-1 positive tumors determined by reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, preferably, or immunohistochemistry or expression of LAGE-1 by RT-PCR.
2. Advanced disease and have declined, delayed, failed or completed standard therapy.
3. Full recovery from surgery.
4. Expected survival of at least 6 months.
5. Karnofsky performance scale ≥ 60.
6. Adequate bone marrow, kidney, liver and immune functions.
7. Able and willing to give valid written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Other serious illnesses, e.g., serious infections requiring antibiotics or bleeding disorders, clinically significant liver or renal insufficiency requiring treatment.
3. Patients with serious intercurrent illness, requiring hospitalization.
4. Known HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C positivity.
5. History of autoimmune diseases (e.g. SLE, scleroderma). Vitiligo is not an exclusion criterion.
6. Concomitant systemic treatment with corticosteroids, anti-histaminic drugs or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Specific COX-2 inhibitors are permitted. Low dose aspirin is permitted. Topical or inhalational steroids are permitted.
7. Evidence of skin disease (e.g. psoriasis, eczema or keloid formation) at the proposed administration site.
8. Allergy to gold (including gold jewelry).
9. History or evidence of chrysotherapy (gold salts).
10. Chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy within 4 weeks prior to first dosing (6 weeks for nitrosoureas).
11. Other malignancy within 3 years prior to entry into the study, except for treated non-melanoma skin cancer, cervical carcinoma in situ.
12. Mental impairment, in the opinion of the investigator, that may compromise the ability to give informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study.
13. Lack of availability for immunological and clinical follow-up assessments.
14. Participation in any other clinical trial involving another investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to first dosing.
15. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
16. Women of childbearing potential: Refusal or inability to use effective means of contraception.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
New York Presbyterian Hospital
OTHER
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
OTHER
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Padmanee Sharma, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Genitourinary Med Onc
Nasser K Altorki, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, United States
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LUD2002-006
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2005-0013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.