Xenon Inhalation During Orthopaedic Surgery in Elderly Subjects.

NCT ID: NCT00192959

Last Updated: 2005-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-03-31

Study Completion Date

2004-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective was to explore the feasibility of inhaled xenon for sedation in terms of its effect on postoperative cognitive function in elderly, in comparison with the postoperative cognitive function found after IV propofol sedation in the same population.The secondary objectives were designed to assess the feasibility of xenon sedation in terms of its effects on different neuropsycho-logical test variables, vital signs, sedation levels and safety in elderly orthopaedic subjects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary endpoint: - The primary efficacy parameter was a combined score based on the seven variables derived from four validated neuropsychological tests of cognitive function; Visual Verbal Learning test, Concept Shifting test, Stroop Color Word Interference test and Letter Digit Coding test. The parameter was used for comparing changes in test results between the screening and first postoperative follow-up testing for the treatment groups.Secondary endpoints:- Cognitive performance changes from baseline to the first post-operative follow-up judged separately for each of the seven variables from the changes in the test results.- Cognitive performance changes from baseline to the second postoperative follow-up judged separately and globally for each of the seven variables from the changes in test results.- Adequacy of ventilation (respiratory rate and pulse oximetry)- Adequacy of xenon sedation by monitoring depth of unconsciousness, signs of airway irritation, need for additional sedatives, time to recovery from anaesthesia. - Technical performance of xenon delivery device

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anaesthesia Postoperative Cognitive Function

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Anaesthesia Surgery Postoperative Neuropsychological test

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Xenon vs propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female subjects ≥ 60 years of age.
* American Soc. of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) I-III status \[27\]
* Referred for elective orthopaedic knee surgery with an anticipated duration of \> 45 min
* Expected to remain in hospital for at least 3 days
* Expected to be able to comply with the study protocol throughout the study period
* Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \> 23
* Informed consent given

Exclusion Criteria

* Disease of the CNS (infectious, metabolic, tumours, dementia, epilepsy, major psychiatric disease, confusion/ delirium according to Diagnostic \& Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) IV criteria)
* Contradiction for spinal anaesthesia
* Contradiction for laryngeal mask
* Regular use of tranquillisers, or antidepressants, if prescribed by psychiatrist for psychosis or depression
* Undergone neuropsychological testing within the last year
* Unable to follow study procedures, illiteracy, or poor comprehension of the language used in the psychometric tests
* Severe visual or auditory disorder
* Alcoholism or drug abuse

CNS disease BMI \> 35 Inab
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Linde AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lars S Rasmussen, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KF 02-065/03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id