Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-08-31
2008-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Effects of Incobotulinum Toxin vs Corticosteroid in Plantar Fascitis
NCT06788158
Effectiveness of Infiltrations in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciopathy
NCT06671223
Embolization for the Treatment of Heel Pain Secondary to Plantar Fasciitis
NCT06805942
Clinical Evaluation of Placement of Radiofrequency-based Plasma Microdebridement in the Treatment Algorithm for Foot and Ankle Tendinosis and Plantar Fasciosis
NCT00420875
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability, of EN3835 vs Placebo in the Treatment of Plantar Fibromatosis
NCT05152173
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
More than two million Americans receive treatment each year for plantar fasciitis and fasciosis. Conservative treatment options for plantar fasciosis include rest, stretching, strengthening, and massage, progressing to non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, steroid injections or iontophoresis with continued recalcitrance. Orthotics, heel cups, night splints and plantar strapping are other conservative options frequently recommended by treating physicians. Patient outcomes and response to conservative measures are usually positive, with non-responsive cases, approximately 10% of all presenting cases, receiving surgical care. Extracorporeal shockwave treatment has recently been advocated for the recalcitrant cases and has shown to be effective in 60-80 percent of the cases. Plantar fascia release, either partial or complete, is commonly the surgical procedure of choice for treating plantar fasciosis. However, this surgery has a risk of complications and is thought to alter the biomechanics of the foot, which may be linked to post-operative lateral column pain and long-term disability. Because of the potential postoperative sequelae with plantar fascia release, it is valuable to examine less invasive surgical techniques for treating recalcitrant plantar fasciosis.
The concept of using a plasma RF-based microsurgical approach as a viable modality for treating tendinosis, and now, recalcitrant plantar fasciosis, was originally drawn from the research work conducted in patients treated for congestive heart failure using laser or RF-based transmyocardial revascularization (TMR). The mechanism of action behind the clinical success observed with laser and RF-based TMR was theorized to be associated with the localized angiogenic healing response noted to occur following the procedure. Localized angiogenesis had not been observed previously using mechanical devices for TMR, which were also less successful clinically. To substantiate adopting a TMR-like approach for treating tendinosis, the capability of plasma RF-based microsurgery for initiating an angiogenic healing response was examined in vivo using histology and biochemical analysis. The sum of several studies provides good evidence to suggest that plasma RF-based microsurgery can promote an angiogenic healing response using an appropriate application.
Preliminary clinical experience following plasma RF-based micro-tenotomy has demonstrated excellent success in treating chronic, refractive tendinosis. The investigators reported that this technique was technically simple to perform and was much less invasive than conventional surgery. Patients had a rapid and uncomplicated recovery and reported minimal to no pain 7-10 days following the procedure; their pain relief persisted or improved through 24 months. Magnetic resonance imaging correlated well with clinical results. These promising clinical findings, as well as the evidence from the basic research studies, led us to consider evaluating this plasma RF-based approach for treating symptomatic, chronic, recalcitrant heel pain resembling plantar fasciosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Coblation-based fasciotomy for relieving pain associated with recalcitrant plantar fasciosis and, secondarily, to determine whether there may be additional potential benefits stemming from its use, such as reduced incidence of postoperative complications and improved function, compared to conventional surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Percutaneous Fasciotomy
ArthroCare TOPAZ™ MicroDebrider™ using Coblation
Percutaneous treatment of plantar fascia using the Topaz device. No incision performed.
2
Standard Fasciotomy
Surgical Fasciotomy
Standard surgical fasciotomy using an incision to treat the plantar fascia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ArthroCare TOPAZ™ MicroDebrider™ using Coblation
Percutaneous treatment of plantar fascia using the Topaz device. No incision performed.
Surgical Fasciotomy
Standard surgical fasciotomy using an incision to treat the plantar fascia.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Tenderness with palpation and local pressure over the medial calcaneal tuberosity on passive dorsiflexion of the foot
* VAS (Visual Analog Scale) pain score of \> 5 points on a scale of 0 to 10, during the first few minutes of walking in the morning
* Ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirming plantar fasciitis/fasciosis
* Symptoms consistent with plantar fasciitis/fasciosis for at least 6 months as assessed by patient history
* Pain unresponsive to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and any four of the following conservative treatments: rest, taping, orthotics, shoe modifications, night splinting, casting, physical therapy, or local corticosteroid injections for up to 3 months
* Must be at least 18 years old and no more than 72 years old
* Must sign the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent form
* Subject is willing and able to complete required follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
* History or documentation showing type I and type II diabetes mellitus
* Physical findings and documentation of coagulopathy, infection, tumor or other systemic disease(s)
* History or documentation showing peripheral vascular disease or autoimmune disease
* Subject has received NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen, naproxen) for treatment of plantar fasciitis/fasciosis 2 weeks prior to treatment by this study
* Subject has received NSAIDs (e.g. ibuprofen, naproxen) or oral corticosteroids 2 weeks prior to treatment by this study
* Subject is receiving worker's compensation
* Subject is currently involved in litigation related to the injury being studied
* Prior surgical treatment of the plantar fascia(s) to be treated by this study
* Subject is currently participating in another drug/device study related to the injured plantar fascia
* Pregnant or pregnant suspected subjects
* Clinically significant bilateral plantar fasciitis/fasciosis with a VAS pain scale of \> 5 bilaterally
* Subject is not capable of understanding or responding to study questionnaires.
* Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) within 6 months of study treatment
18 Years
72 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ArthroCare Corporation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lowell S. Weil, Sr., DPM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weil Foot & Ankle Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Weil Foot & Ankle Institute
Des Plaines, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A0105WW
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.