Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
PHASE4
Total Enrollment
700 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2002-08-31
Study Completion Date
2007-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is known that patients who fracture their legs sometimes develop blood clots (known as deep vein thrombosis) in their legs. These clots may cause pain and swelling in the leg or they may detach and travel to the lungs producing shortness of breath, chest pain, and sometimes death. Unfortunately, it is not known how frequently these complications occur after leg fractures, or if the use of a blood thinner medication can effectively and safely prevent these clots. Doctors at hospitals across Canada are conducting a study in which patients who have surgery for leg fractures receive either a once-daily injection of a blood thinner, known as low molecular weight heparin, or a placebo injection for up to 14 days after their fractures. Neither the patients nor the doctors know which patient is on the medication and which patient is on placebo. All patients receive an ultrasound examination of their legs at 2 weeks after surgery to monitor for deep vein thrombosis. In addition, all patients are checked for symptoms of leg or lung clots and any side effects of the medication for 3 months. If the blood thinner is shown to be effective at reducing this complication and documented to be safe and cost-effective in this setting it will be recommended for use in such patients. If, on the other hand, the frequency of deep vein thrombosis is too low to justify the cost or inconvenience of taking this medication, this will also be an important finding.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. What is the incidence of clinically-important venous thromboembolism (VTE) following surgically-repaired, isolated fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle?
2. In patients with surgically-repaired, isolated fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle, is simple anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis effective, safe, and cost-effective?
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
Isolated below-knee fractures are very common injuries seen in all emergency departments and general hospitals. Venographic studies suggest that the incidence of overall deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following such fractures is in the range of 20-50%. However, the prospective studies that have screened patients with these fractures for DVT are few in number and have methodologic limitations. In addition, most of the thrombi detected are distal and small and, therefore, of uncertain clinical significance. Although patients with leg fractures are at risk for symptomatic DVT, PE, and occasionally fatal PE, there is a paucity of reliable data about the incidence of, and risk factors for, the development of clinically-important VTE following contemporary treatment of these fractures.
Furthermore, data related to thromboprophylaxis in these patients are insufficient to recommend prophylaxis, even in patients whose fractures are managed surgically. There is considerable variation in the use of prophylaxis for such patients across North America; the majority of orthopedic surgeons use no prophylaxis, a small proportion use in-hospital prophylaxis only, and an even smaller proportion use therapeutic levels of anticoagulation until the patient is fully mobile without a cast. The routine use of prophylaxis for patients with below-knee fractures may not be necessary, may be associated with adverse effects related to the prophylaxis, and may not be cost-effective. A methodologically rigorous study is required to address all of the above issues.
The D-KAF trial will determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, clinically-important VTE in patients with isolated fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle, who are managed surgically. At the same time, D-KAF will assess the role, if any, of routine thromboprophylaxis in such patients. The study has the potential to significantly impact on the care of these patients irrespective of whether the result is "positive" or "negative." The use of clinically relevant endpoints will be of great importance in the design of future prophylaxis trials in this and other patient groups.
OBJECTIVES
Among patients with isolated, lower extremity fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle, treated surgically, to determine:
1. The incidence of clinically-important VTE over the first 3 months after injury in patients receiving usual care (no thromboprophylaxis);
2. The predictors of clinically-important VTE in usual care patients;
3. The effectiveness, compared to placebo, of a LMWH, dalteparin, given as 5,000 U once daily for up to 14 days, in the prevention of clinically-important VTE;
4. The safety of this prophylaxis regimen with respect to clinically-important bleeding;
5. The cost-effectiveness of the active intervention;
6. The predictors of prophylaxis failure (clinically-important VTE and adverse events);
7. The incidence of clinically-important VTE from the time that LMWH is discontinued to week 12; this objective seeks to determine if prophylaxis beyond the first 2 weeks is indicated.
STUDY DESIGN
This is a randomized, double-blind, multi-center comparison of the LMWH, dalteparin, versus placebo in patients with isolated fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle, who undergo surgical repair. It will assess the epidemiology of VTE following these injuries and determine the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of dalteparin in preventing clinically important VTE.
INTERVENTIONS
All eligible patients who have provided informed consent, are randomized to receive:
dalteparin, 5000 anti-Xa units OR saline placebo given once daily by subcutaneous injection using identical pre-loaded syringes
* The first dose of study drug commences as soon as possible after the fracture and always within 72 hours of injury.
* Non-study anticoagulant prophylaxis and mechanical prophylaxis (graduated compression stockings, pneumatic compression pumps or venous foot pumps) is not allowed. Use of aspirin, antiplatelet agents and NSAIDS is discouraged unless the indication is for cardiac or stroke prophylaxis, the management of arthritis, or short-term postoperative analgesia.
PATIENT ASSESSMENT
Baseline Assessment:
At baseline, each patient has:
* History and physical examination
* Completion of baseline case report form which summarizes past medical and surgical history and details of the current injury and its management
* CBC, INR, PTT, creatinine
Follow-up Assessments:
* All inpatients are seen daily to monitor adherence to the protocol as well as symptoms and signs of DVT, PE, clinically significant bleeding and other adverse events.
* If discharged prior to 14 days, patients are taught to self-administer the study injections at home by a research nurse. Patients are called at home every 3 days to ensure compliance with the study medication and to address any questions or concerns related to the study.
* All patients are seen in follow-up 14 ± 2 days after injury. At this visit, a focussed history and physical examination is performed and a CBC obtained. All patients are screened for proximal DVT using bilateral duplex ultrasound examination.
* Patients with normal DUS have the study medication discontinued and no further DVT prophylaxis is given for the remainder of the study period.
* All patients receive a telephone follow up at 6 ± 1 week and 3 months ± 1 week after randomization to assess their clinical status. They are asked specifically about symptoms and signs of DVT and PE, hospitalizations, and co-intervention (administration of anticoagulants).
* Clinical suspicion of possible DVT or PE during the 3-month study period is investigated in a standardized manner using objective diagnostic tests and pre-specified diagnostic algorithms.
* All patients who develop objectively confirmed DVT or PE, either symptomatic or asymptomatic (detected on the day 14 screening ultrasound), are treated with full-dose anticoagulation (generally LMWH followed by warfarin) for at least 3 months.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary Outcome = Clinically important venous thromboembolism in the two study groups. This is a composite outcome measure that includes symptomatic DVT, symptomatic PE, and fatal PE during the 3 months following fracture plus asymptomatic proximal DVT at the end of the prophylaxis phase.
Symptomatic DVT: is defined as clinically suspected DVT, confirmed by positive duplex ultrasound or venography.
Symptomatic PE: is defined as clinically suspected PE, confirmed by high probability V/Q scan or positive leg imaging for DVT, spiral CT or pulmonary angiogram.
Fatal PE: as confirmed by autopsy.
Asymptomatic proximal DVT: by screening ultrasound examination at 14 +2 days.
Secondary Outcomes:
Clinically important VTE during the prophylaxis phase (day 1 to discontinuation of study medication - this usually corresponds to the end-of-prophylaxis phase DUS or day 14 + 2).
Clinically important VTE during the post-prophylaxis phase (usually day 14 to 3 months).
Bleeding (modified International Bleeding Classification):
Major - defined as overt bleeding that is life threatening or requires surgical intervention, the transfusion of 1 or more units of red blood cells or is associated with a drop in hemoglobin of ³ 20 g/L or development of hemarthrosis or compartment syndrome.
Minor - overt bleeding other than that defined as major. Bleeding index: This validated measure of bleeding takes into account both change in hematocrit and the amount of blood transfused.
Costs associated with the prophylaxis and with the relevant outcomes.
ANALYSES
Baseline characteristics of the two study groups will be compared for patients randomized and for those who successfully complete the study using appropriate parametric or nonparametric statistics.
Primary analysis will be based on an intention-to-treat principle and will compare the proportion of patients in each group that develop the primary outcome, objectively-confirmed, clinically-important VTE, over the 3 month follow-up period, using the Yates-corrected chi-square test of two independent proportions.
Secondary analyses will compare the rates of clinically important VTE for the two study phases, the prophylaxis phase (randomization to day 14 + 2) and the post-prophylaxis phase (day 14 to 3 months).
A safety analysis will compare bleeding and other adverse events in the two groups over the prophylaxis phase and the entire study period.
Compliance with the assigned intervention will be compared.
Cost-effectiveness will be determined prospectively.
Predictors of thrombosis in patients with lower extremity fractures (from the placebo group) and predictors of prophylaxis failures (from the active treatment group) will be explored using logistic regression analysis (although we recognize that the number of events will likely be low). The factors to be considered include: age, gender, obesity (BMI), smoking, varicose veins, oral contraceptive or hormone replacement use, number of risk factors, type of fracture, method of fracture treatment, delay to surgery, OR time, time after injury to initiation of prophylaxis, compliance, mobility at the end of the prophylaxis phase, and fracture complications (including infection, reoperation, non-union).
SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION
1. Assumptions used: a = 0.05 (1-tail), power = 80%, rate of clinically important VTE in the control group = 4%; risk reduction with prophylaxis = 75%, yielding a Number Needed to Prophylax = 33.
2. Assuming a 5% post-randomization attrition rate, the estimated sample size will be 350 patients per group; a total of 700 patients.
3. A formal, blinded interim analysis will be performed after 500 patients have completed follow-up.
1. What is the incidence of clinically-important venous thromboembolism (VTE) following surgically-repaired, isolated fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle?
2. In patients with surgically-repaired, isolated fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle, is simple anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis effective, safe, and cost-effective?
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
Isolated below-knee fractures are very common injuries seen in all emergency departments and general hospitals. Venographic studies suggest that the incidence of overall deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following such fractures is in the range of 20-50%. However, the prospective studies that have screened patients with these fractures for DVT are few in number and have methodologic limitations. In addition, most of the thrombi detected are distal and small and, therefore, of uncertain clinical significance. Although patients with leg fractures are at risk for symptomatic DVT, PE, and occasionally fatal PE, there is a paucity of reliable data about the incidence of, and risk factors for, the development of clinically-important VTE following contemporary treatment of these fractures.
Furthermore, data related to thromboprophylaxis in these patients are insufficient to recommend prophylaxis, even in patients whose fractures are managed surgically. There is considerable variation in the use of prophylaxis for such patients across North America; the majority of orthopedic surgeons use no prophylaxis, a small proportion use in-hospital prophylaxis only, and an even smaller proportion use therapeutic levels of anticoagulation until the patient is fully mobile without a cast. The routine use of prophylaxis for patients with below-knee fractures may not be necessary, may be associated with adverse effects related to the prophylaxis, and may not be cost-effective. A methodologically rigorous study is required to address all of the above issues.
The D-KAF trial will determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, clinically-important VTE in patients with isolated fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle, who are managed surgically. At the same time, D-KAF will assess the role, if any, of routine thromboprophylaxis in such patients. The study has the potential to significantly impact on the care of these patients irrespective of whether the result is "positive" or "negative." The use of clinically relevant endpoints will be of great importance in the design of future prophylaxis trials in this and other patient groups.
OBJECTIVES
Among patients with isolated, lower extremity fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle, treated surgically, to determine:
1. The incidence of clinically-important VTE over the first 3 months after injury in patients receiving usual care (no thromboprophylaxis);
2. The predictors of clinically-important VTE in usual care patients;
3. The effectiveness, compared to placebo, of a LMWH, dalteparin, given as 5,000 U once daily for up to 14 days, in the prevention of clinically-important VTE;
4. The safety of this prophylaxis regimen with respect to clinically-important bleeding;
5. The cost-effectiveness of the active intervention;
6. The predictors of prophylaxis failure (clinically-important VTE and adverse events);
7. The incidence of clinically-important VTE from the time that LMWH is discontinued to week 12; this objective seeks to determine if prophylaxis beyond the first 2 weeks is indicated.
STUDY DESIGN
This is a randomized, double-blind, multi-center comparison of the LMWH, dalteparin, versus placebo in patients with isolated fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle, who undergo surgical repair. It will assess the epidemiology of VTE following these injuries and determine the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of dalteparin in preventing clinically important VTE.
INTERVENTIONS
All eligible patients who have provided informed consent, are randomized to receive:
dalteparin, 5000 anti-Xa units OR saline placebo given once daily by subcutaneous injection using identical pre-loaded syringes
* The first dose of study drug commences as soon as possible after the fracture and always within 72 hours of injury.
* Non-study anticoagulant prophylaxis and mechanical prophylaxis (graduated compression stockings, pneumatic compression pumps or venous foot pumps) is not allowed. Use of aspirin, antiplatelet agents and NSAIDS is discouraged unless the indication is for cardiac or stroke prophylaxis, the management of arthritis, or short-term postoperative analgesia.
PATIENT ASSESSMENT
Baseline Assessment:
At baseline, each patient has:
* History and physical examination
* Completion of baseline case report form which summarizes past medical and surgical history and details of the current injury and its management
* CBC, INR, PTT, creatinine
Follow-up Assessments:
* All inpatients are seen daily to monitor adherence to the protocol as well as symptoms and signs of DVT, PE, clinically significant bleeding and other adverse events.
* If discharged prior to 14 days, patients are taught to self-administer the study injections at home by a research nurse. Patients are called at home every 3 days to ensure compliance with the study medication and to address any questions or concerns related to the study.
* All patients are seen in follow-up 14 ± 2 days after injury. At this visit, a focussed history and physical examination is performed and a CBC obtained. All patients are screened for proximal DVT using bilateral duplex ultrasound examination.
* Patients with normal DUS have the study medication discontinued and no further DVT prophylaxis is given for the remainder of the study period.
* All patients receive a telephone follow up at 6 ± 1 week and 3 months ± 1 week after randomization to assess their clinical status. They are asked specifically about symptoms and signs of DVT and PE, hospitalizations, and co-intervention (administration of anticoagulants).
* Clinical suspicion of possible DVT or PE during the 3-month study period is investigated in a standardized manner using objective diagnostic tests and pre-specified diagnostic algorithms.
* All patients who develop objectively confirmed DVT or PE, either symptomatic or asymptomatic (detected on the day 14 screening ultrasound), are treated with full-dose anticoagulation (generally LMWH followed by warfarin) for at least 3 months.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary Outcome = Clinically important venous thromboembolism in the two study groups. This is a composite outcome measure that includes symptomatic DVT, symptomatic PE, and fatal PE during the 3 months following fracture plus asymptomatic proximal DVT at the end of the prophylaxis phase.
Symptomatic DVT: is defined as clinically suspected DVT, confirmed by positive duplex ultrasound or venography.
Symptomatic PE: is defined as clinically suspected PE, confirmed by high probability V/Q scan or positive leg imaging for DVT, spiral CT or pulmonary angiogram.
Fatal PE: as confirmed by autopsy.
Asymptomatic proximal DVT: by screening ultrasound examination at 14 +2 days.
Secondary Outcomes:
Clinically important VTE during the prophylaxis phase (day 1 to discontinuation of study medication - this usually corresponds to the end-of-prophylaxis phase DUS or day 14 + 2).
Clinically important VTE during the post-prophylaxis phase (usually day 14 to 3 months).
Bleeding (modified International Bleeding Classification):
Major - defined as overt bleeding that is life threatening or requires surgical intervention, the transfusion of 1 or more units of red blood cells or is associated with a drop in hemoglobin of ³ 20 g/L or development of hemarthrosis or compartment syndrome.
Minor - overt bleeding other than that defined as major. Bleeding index: This validated measure of bleeding takes into account both change in hematocrit and the amount of blood transfused.
Costs associated with the prophylaxis and with the relevant outcomes.
ANALYSES
Baseline characteristics of the two study groups will be compared for patients randomized and for those who successfully complete the study using appropriate parametric or nonparametric statistics.
Primary analysis will be based on an intention-to-treat principle and will compare the proportion of patients in each group that develop the primary outcome, objectively-confirmed, clinically-important VTE, over the 3 month follow-up period, using the Yates-corrected chi-square test of two independent proportions.
Secondary analyses will compare the rates of clinically important VTE for the two study phases, the prophylaxis phase (randomization to day 14 + 2) and the post-prophylaxis phase (day 14 to 3 months).
A safety analysis will compare bleeding and other adverse events in the two groups over the prophylaxis phase and the entire study period.
Compliance with the assigned intervention will be compared.
Cost-effectiveness will be determined prospectively.
Predictors of thrombosis in patients with lower extremity fractures (from the placebo group) and predictors of prophylaxis failures (from the active treatment group) will be explored using logistic regression analysis (although we recognize that the number of events will likely be low). The factors to be considered include: age, gender, obesity (BMI), smoking, varicose veins, oral contraceptive or hormone replacement use, number of risk factors, type of fracture, method of fracture treatment, delay to surgery, OR time, time after injury to initiation of prophylaxis, compliance, mobility at the end of the prophylaxis phase, and fracture complications (including infection, reoperation, non-union).
SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION
1. Assumptions used: a = 0.05 (1-tail), power = 80%, rate of clinically important VTE in the control group = 4%; risk reduction with prophylaxis = 75%, yielding a Number Needed to Prophylax = 33.
2. Assuming a 5% post-randomization attrition rate, the estimated sample size will be 350 patients per group; a total of 700 patients.
3. A formal, blinded interim analysis will be performed after 500 patients have completed follow-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Pulmonary Embolism
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Thrombosis
Pulmonary Embolism
Low Molecular Weight Heparin
Tibial Fractures
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
PREVENTION
Blinding Strategy
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low Molecular Weight Heparin (dalteparin)
Intervention Type
DRUG
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 16 years
* Unilateral or bilateral, closed or open, fractures of the lower extremity distal to the knee including:
1. Isolated fractures of the tibia including tibial plateau, shaft and plafond and medial malleolus
2. Isolated fractures of the fibula including fibular head, fibular diaphysis,distal fibula and lateral malleolus
3. Combined fractures of the tibia and fibula
* Tibia and/or fibula fractures may be accompanied by fractures of the patella and/or foot as well as ligamentous injuries as long as either the tibia or the fibula is involved
* Patients must be scheduled to undergo surgery (internal or external fixation) for repair of their fracture during the current admission
* Unilateral or bilateral, closed or open, fractures of the lower extremity distal to the knee including:
1. Isolated fractures of the tibia including tibial plateau, shaft and plafond and medial malleolus
2. Isolated fractures of the fibula including fibular head, fibular diaphysis,distal fibula and lateral malleolus
3. Combined fractures of the tibia and fibula
* Tibia and/or fibula fractures may be accompanied by fractures of the patella and/or foot as well as ligamentous injuries as long as either the tibia or the fibula is involved
* Patients must be scheduled to undergo surgery (internal or external fixation) for repair of their fracture during the current admission
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients presenting greater than 72 hours after injury
* Major injury involving other site(s)
* Lower extremity vascular injury requiring surgical repair
* Known systemic bleeding disorder or INR \> 1.5, aPTT \> 40 sec, or platelets \< 50 x 109/L at baseline
* Active, uncontrolled bleeding (as determined by the attending surgeon or delegate)
* Intracranial or other major bleed in the previous 4 weeks
* Ongoing need for anticoagulation for other reasons
* Previous DVT or PE (objectively proven or treated with anticoagulants)
* Known molecular hypercoagulable state
* Active cancer
* Inability to receive contrast dye because of pregnancy, contrast allergy, or renal failure (serum creatinine \> 300 mmol/L)
* Hypersensitivity to heparin or LMWH (including history of HIT)
* Inability to arrange out-of-hospital study medication administration
* Anticipated inability to undergo endpoint duplex ultrasound or follow-up (day 14 ± 2, 6 weeks, 3 months)
* Inability or refusal to provide informed consent· Previous participation in this study
* Estimated weight less than 40 kg
* Major injury involving other site(s)
* Lower extremity vascular injury requiring surgical repair
* Known systemic bleeding disorder or INR \> 1.5, aPTT \> 40 sec, or platelets \< 50 x 109/L at baseline
* Active, uncontrolled bleeding (as determined by the attending surgeon or delegate)
* Intracranial or other major bleed in the previous 4 weeks
* Ongoing need for anticoagulation for other reasons
* Previous DVT or PE (objectively proven or treated with anticoagulants)
* Known molecular hypercoagulable state
* Active cancer
* Inability to receive contrast dye because of pregnancy, contrast allergy, or renal failure (serum creatinine \> 300 mmol/L)
* Hypersensitivity to heparin or LMWH (including history of HIT)
* Inability to arrange out-of-hospital study medication administration
* Anticipated inability to undergo endpoint duplex ultrasound or follow-up (day 14 ± 2, 6 weeks, 3 months)
* Inability or refusal to provide informed consent· Previous participation in this study
* Estimated weight less than 40 kg
Minimum Eligible Age
16 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Pfizer
INDUSTRY
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rita Selby, MBBS, FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre
William Geerts, MD, FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
2E3.32 Walter MacKenzie HSC
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Site Status
St. Paul's Hospital-Providence Health Care
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Site Status
Hamilton Health Sciences- General Site
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
McMaster University Medical Centre, HSC
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Hamilton Health Sciences-Henderson Site
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Ottawa Hospital - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
North York General Hospital-General Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Toronto East General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
McGill University Health Centre-Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Canada
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Bergqvist D, Lassen MR, Colwell CW, Ray JG. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):338S-400S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.338S.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Selby R, Geerts WH, Kreder HJ, Crowther MA, Kaus L, Sealey F; D-KAF (Dalteparin in Knee-to-Ankle Fracture) Investigators. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of the prevention of clinically important venous thromboembolism after isolated lower leg fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015 May;29(5):224-30. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000250.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
524E-CVD-0042-042
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id