BENEFIT Study (Betaferon® / Betaseron® in Newly Emerging Multiple Sclerosis for Initial Treatment) and BENEFIT Follow-up Study

NCT ID: NCT00185211

Last Updated: 2013-12-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

468 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-08-31

Study Completion Date

2008-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will primarily compare the long-term effects of an early and continued treatment with Betaferon/Betaseron (patients who were treated with active medication during the double-blind BENEFIT study) to treatment initiated either after Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) has been diagnosed or after two years (those patients who were treated with placebo during the double-blind BENEFIT study).

Analyses are based on the integrated data of the initial BENEFIT study and this follow-up study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study has previously been posted by Schering AG, Germany. Schering AG, Germany has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc..

Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the sponsor of the trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Initial IFNB-1b (Interferon beta-1b)

Initial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)

Intervention Type DRUG

Initial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase

Initial Placebo

Initial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)

Intervention Type DRUG

Initial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)

Initial Betaferon/Betaseron treatment (Interferon beta-1b, IFNB-1b), 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day, continued in Follow-up phase

Intervention Type DRUG

Interferon beta-1b (Betaseron, BAY86-5046)

Initial placebo treatment; Betaferon/Betaseron, 250 ug administered s.c. (subcutaneous) every other day offered in Follow-up phase (= this trial)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who have reached scheduled end of study in BENEFIT, either by developing CDMS or by completing 24 months

Exclusion Criteria

* No participation in the initial BENEFIT study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

48 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Glostrup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Seinäjoki, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Rennes, Brittany Region, France

Site Status

Bordeaux, Gironde, France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

München, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Hennigsdorf, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Giessen, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Marburg, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Offenbach, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Homburg, Saarland, Germany

Site Status

Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Szeged, Csongrád megye, Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Haifa, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Tel Litwinsky, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Gallarate, Varese, Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Sittard, , Netherlands

Site Status

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Basel, Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland

Site Status

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium Canada Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Hungary Israel Italy Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Edan G, Kappos L, Montalban X, Polman CH, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Barkhof F, Herrmann J, Lanius V, Stemper B, Pohl C, Sandbrink R, Pleimes D; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term impact of interferon beta-1b in patients with CIS: 8-year follow-up of BENEFIT. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;85(11):1183-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306222. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24218527 (View on PubMed)

Nagtegaal GJ, Pohl C, Wattjes MP, Hulst HE, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Miller D, Montalban X, Kappos L, Edan G, Pleimes D, Beckman K, Stemper B, Polman CH, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Interferon beta-1b reduces black holes in a randomised trial of clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2014 Feb;20(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/1352458513494491. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23842212 (View on PubMed)

Penner IK, Stemper B, Calabrese P, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Pleimes D, Lanius V, Pohl C, Kappos L, Sandbrink R. Effects of interferon beta-1b on cognitive performance in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012 Oct;18(10):1466-71. doi: 10.1177/1352458512442438. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22492127 (View on PubMed)

Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu EW, Metzig C, Bauer L, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term effect of early treatment with interferon beta-1b after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: 5-year active treatment extension of the phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Nov;8(11):987-97. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70237-6. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19748319 (View on PubMed)

Hartung HP, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Petkau J, White R, Sahajpal V, Knappertz V, Beckmann K, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C; BENEFIT Study Group. Interferon beta-1b-neutralizing antibodies 5 years after clinically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):835-43. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c90d7. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21849647 (View on PubMed)

Freedman MS, Metzig C, Kappos L, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Yarden J, Spector L, Fire E, Dotan N, Schwenke S, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Pohl C. Predictive nature of IgM anti-alpha-glucose serum biomarker for relapse activity and EDSS progression in CIS patients: a BENEFIT study analysis. Mult Scler. 2012 Jul;18(7):966-73. doi: 10.1177/1352458511432327. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22183938 (View on PubMed)

Waschbisch A, Sandbrink R, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Schwab S, Pohl C, Wiendl H. Evaluation of soluble HLA-G as a biomarker for multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2011 Aug 9;77(6):596-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c14d. Epub 2011 Jul 27. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21795647 (View on PubMed)

Moraal B, Pohl C, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH, Edan G, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Miller DH, Montalban X, Lanius V, Sandbrink R, Barkhof F. Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of conversion to multiple sclerosis in the BENEFIT study. Arch Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(11):1345-52. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.243.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19901165 (View on PubMed)

Polman C, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Selmaj K, Uitdehaag BM, Dahms S, Bauer L, Pohl C, Sandbrink R; BENEFIT investigators. Subgroups of the BENEFIT study: risk of developing MS and treatment effect of interferon beta-1b. J Neurol. 2008 Apr;255(4):480-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-007-0733-2. Epub 2007 Nov 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18004635 (View on PubMed)

Caloyeras JP, Zhang B, Wang C, Eriksson M, Fredrikson S, Beckmann K, Knappertz V, Pohl C, Hartung HP, Shah D, Miller JD, Sandbrink R, Lanius V, Gondek K, Russell MW. Cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon beta-1b for the treatment of patients with a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2012 May;34(5):1132-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22541587 (View on PubMed)

Nielsen JM, Pohl C, Polman CH, Barkhof F, Freedman MS, Edan G, Miller DH, Bauer L, Sandbrink R, Kappos L, Uitdehaag BM. MRI characteristics are predictive for CDMS in monofocal, but not in multifocal patients with a clinically isolated syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2009 May 20;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19457248 (View on PubMed)

Barkhof F, Polman CH, Radue EW, Kappos L, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Poppe P, de Vos M, Lasri F, Bauer L, Dahms S, Wagner K, Pohl C, Sandbrink R. Magnetic resonance imaging effects of interferon beta-1b in the BENEFIT study: integrated 2-year results. Arch Neurol. 2007 Sep;64(9):1292-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.9.1292.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17846268 (View on PubMed)

Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Radu EW, Bauer L, Dahms S, Lanius V, Pohl C, Sandbrink R; BENEFIT Study Group. Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study. Lancet. 2007 Aug 4;370(9585):389-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61194-5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17679016 (View on PubMed)

De Jager PL, Chibnik LB, Cui J, Reischl J, Lehr S, Simon KC, Aubin C, Bauer D, Heubach JF, Sandbrink R, Tyblova M, Lelkova P; Steering committee of the BENEFIT study; Steering committee of the BEYOND study; Steering committee of the LTF study; Steering committee of the CCR1 study; Havrdova E, Pohl C, Horakova D, Ascherio A, Hafler DA, Karlson EW. Integration of genetic risk factors into a clinical algorithm for multiple sclerosis susceptibility: a weighted genetic risk score. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Dec;8(12):1111-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70275-3. Epub 2009 Oct 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19879194 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

305207

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

91031

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id